@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 9 months agoEat leadmander.xyzimagemessage-square282fedilinkarrow-up11.37Kcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.37KimageEat leadmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 9 months agomessage-square282fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•9 months agoThis would mean that there was more uranium around millions and billions of years in the past so why isn’t there any evidence of prehistoric nukes in the fossil record
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•9 months agoThere’s at least one prehistorical nuclear reactor
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•9 months agoWow, today I learned. Thanks for sharing.
This would mean that there was more uranium around millions and billions of years in the past so why isn’t there any evidence of prehistoric nukes in the fossil record
There’s at least one prehistorical nuclear reactor
Wow, today I learned. Thanks for sharing.