Maven (famous) to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • edit-29 months agoMicrosoft Please Fixlemmy.zipimagemessage-square340fedilinkarrow-up1891
arrow-up1891imageMicrosoft Please Fixlemmy.zipMaven (famous) to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • edit-29 months agomessage-square340fedilink
minus-square@cocobean@bookwormstory.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish42•9 months agoAlso, why not send them to the recycle bin? I never really thought about it before, but that does seem a reasonable UX improvement for this case
minus-square@stetech@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•9 months agoBecause “the underlying Git nukes them right away, so why shouldn’t we perma-delete the files, too?” Anything else’d be effort…
minus-squareNatelinkfedilinkEnglish8•9 months agoHonestly it probably just runs the underlying git command
minus-square@stetech@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•9 months agoSorta, but sorta no. It was actually addressed in https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/issues/32459 – the GUI implied a different git command than what actually got executed!
minus-square@murtaza64@programming.devlinkfedilink3•9 months agoI wonder if there’s already a git extension to automatically stash the working tree on every clean/reset/checkout operation…
Also, why not send them to the recycle bin? I never really thought about it before, but that does seem a reasonable UX improvement for this case
Because “the underlying Git nukes them right away, so why shouldn’t we perma-delete the files, too?”
Anything else’d be effort…
Honestly it probably just runs the underlying git command
Sorta, but sorta no.
It was actually addressed in https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/issues/32459 – the GUI implied a different git command than what actually got executed!
I wonder if there’s already a git extension to automatically stash the working tree on every clean/reset/checkout operation…