@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 5 months agoThis post is the ”_____”lemm.eeimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1254
arrow-up1254imageThis post is the ”_____”lemm.ee@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•5 months agoBoth sexes can have or lack tits. So the first one is okay, the second one is sexist.
minus-squareI'll be on [email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-25 months agoIn the same way people of all genders can have tits, so can people of all genders have nuts, so if that’s your reasoning, either both are sexist, or neither are.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•5 months agoIf you read my comment carefully you will notice that I was talking about Sex, not Gender.
minus-squareI'll be on [email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•edit-25 months agoAnd if you knew anything about either, you’d know that both are a spectrum, so your argument is still invalid https://scatter.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/sex-as-a-social-construct/ https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•5 months agoWho said anything about sex? I’d rather read an essay comparing these:
Both sexes can have or lack tits. So the first one is okay, the second one is sexist.
In the same way people of all genders can have tits, so can people of all genders have nuts, so if that’s your reasoning, either both are sexist, or neither are.
If you read my comment carefully you will notice that I was talking about Sex, not Gender.
ovaries are just nuts in the inside
And if you knew anything about either, you’d know that both are a spectrum, so your argument is still invalid
https://scatter.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/sex-as-a-social-construct/
https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a
Who said anything about sex? I’d rather read an essay comparing these: