World GDP: $105.4 trillion USD

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26 months ago

    It’s also Methane and CO, gasses that also contain carbon. I know diamond is pretty stable, but it does burn, and then it creates the gasses we try to avoid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      CO is not a significant greenhouse gas. (And N20 is…)

      Are diamond particulates likely to burn if they’re dispersed in the atmosphere?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Are diamond particulates likely to burn if they’re dispersed in the atmosphere?

        Actually yes, if they enter the engine of a plane they will burn.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            I just wonder why not use sapphire dust instead. Doesn’t it reflect sunlight almost identically?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Not quite minuscule, for every ton of jet fuel burned, 2 tons of oxygen is needed, to take that in, about 3-4 ton of atmospheric air goes through the combustion, the volume of that air is quite a lot, and is only sustained because oxygen is constantly renewed. The diamonds will not have self sustained renewal and will be burned up pretty quickly.
            Also being an aerosol increases surface and potential chemical reactions by a magnitude of maybe a billion per unit, so although we consider diamonds to be very stable in their normal form, a diamond aerosol is obviously much less so, and UV light refracted could accelerate break down of the diamond aerosol, into free carbon, which will create carbon gasses. I bet researchers have considered this, but I see no numbers for it?