World GDP: $105.4 trillion USD

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      I don’t know, but I hear De Beers is already planning to corner the lung transplant market.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    174 months ago

    Isn’t this kind of thing the premise for all those “snowball Earth” sci Fi stories where global cooling went too far

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    214 months ago

    Sweet! Four more years of Trump presidency, and Elon Musk can just pay for it out of pocket.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Elon musk’s kids should be made an example of when reclamation comes around.

      They’re being brought up thinking they can live like gods. How unfortunate would it be if they actually had to live like the rest of us…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    584 months ago

    Yes, let’s just have everyone on Earth breathe in diamond dust all day every day. There’s no way that could be bad for our health.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      284 months ago

      There’s never been a case of something having different behavior or health effects just because of a tiny chemical difference (trans fat) or size difference (micro plastics), what’s the worst that could happen?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      104 months ago

      just wear masks for a few decades, potentially respirators, and probably add whole house air filtration if you want to take it off at night.

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    That amount sounds like total bullshit. Diamonds can be manufactured and once that is done at scale, it won’t be all that expensive. Even at $10000 a ton, five million tonnes would cost just 50 billion.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      $10000/ton is $5/lb from a quick google search they are about $250/lb for industrial diamonds. So 50* 50 or 2500 billion or 2.5 trillion with no idea if they can use run of the mill industrial diamonds or if there will be additional processing to get them into the aerosolized form also how are you going to launch them, and for how many years would we need to do it

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      124 months ago

      That number is for doing it anually for 65 years. It lists roughly 18 billion per year for the cost.

      But besides that, I think you are greatly underestimating the cost of the diamonds. Synthetic ones are way cheaper than natural ones, yes, but there’s a lot of room between “natural diamond expensive” and “actually cheap”. Going by these prices https://www.diamondtech.com/products/categories/diamond_powder_price_list.html

      It’s $2.5 million per tonne. I assume you could get a cheaper price per weight if you’re buying five million tonnes of anything, but it’s still two orders of magnitude more expensive than you are guessing

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      Firstly, it’s 5 million tonnes per year. For 65 years. Secondly, the cost is for a 65 year SAI program, including developing the tech and running the missions. Thirdly, this is all explained in TFA or the links therein.

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      184 months ago

      These are not good ideas. Remember that global warming is just an overarching effect of pollution which we will still have. What diamond dust pollution effects will be, no one knows, but I doubt we want to find out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        134 months ago

        The fossil fuel oligarchy would prefer to give all mammals on Earth emphysema than stop burning fossils, and do it for 10x the price.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    604 months ago

    Of all the aerosols they could think about!

    No chance at all of a basically indestructible material not being destructed if absorbed by lungs (or gills) and leading to some disease. You don’t need to check. There’s no way this could go wrong.

    Or, rather… I believe lead is cheaper… Given how much people like to use it, maybe it’s a better option.

  • GHiLA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 months ago

    I’m still set on “we’re fucked” until I see some more hopeful news.

    When we are fucked and who is first fucked, and making sure I’m not that guy is what I’m trying to determine.

  • AlphaOmega
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    Isn’t this very similar to the annuki and the Sumerian history. Where these aliens came to earth to mine gold to take it back to their planet and use it to save their atmosphere.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    104 months ago

    Let’s throw more carbon to the air, what could go wrong. Is not like it will get to our lungs and destroy everything from the inside.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    384 months ago

    Amazing. Instead of just… fighting climate change by not polluting the planet let’s just fill our entire atmosphere with diamond dust, because that’s the logical decision of course.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s not really any different than usual dust, other than it is even more likely to scratch your phone (oh no!). The surprising thing is the bullshit price number, I’m sure it’s some brain-dead economist looking at the point-price for diamond and with great effort making a single multiplication.

      Edit: The study does note industrial diamond manufacturing, but doesn’t go into detail on why it’s so expensive for diamond powder, other than saying “it would require much more industrial diamond than is currently produced”… Which is just… Empty? Considering industry would change to account for such a drastic rise in demand.

  • marcolo
    link
    fedilink
    24 months ago

    @FlyingSquid
    “Scientists say…”
    All of them, are you sure?
    Geoengineering schemes are not agreed upon by many scientists. There are several types of geoengineering “solutions” and no agreement on any, just suggestions.