Nope, not me… I’m still trying.

  • @nef@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25 months ago

    it includes absolutely nothing that’s already familiar to you

    I truly do not believe that any thought exists without context, if you can find any examples I would be happy to be proven wrong.

      • @nef@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        Sure, but by your definition any thought containing any kind of language would not be “original” because it requires familiarity with the language.

        • @ehpolitical@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Now you’re breaking off into something else that fascinates me… symbolism as a highly efficient method of communication. If you test yourself, you’ll find it takes less time for your brain to process symbols than spoken words… and there’s a very short amount of time in there where your brain understands what it’s looking at without the need of any other language other than symbolism.