• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    In an instant from the point of view of the people on Earth, but from your point of view time still moves forward.

    Edit: guess I was mistaken!

    • moonlight
      link
      fedilink
      23 days ago

      Think about it this way - everything moves through spacetime at the same “speed”, so the faster you go through space, the slower you move through time, which is why photons experience no time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Time is frozen at light speed. You arrive at your destination instantaneously, not even experiencing a tick of Planck time. To an outside observer it takes you time. From the perspective of a photon from the sun, there is no time or distance passing between its genesis in the sun and it landing on your face. From an observer on earth it took 8 minutes and millions of miles.

      • Jerkface (any/all)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 days ago

        Well, you arrive at A destination instantaneously. Important distinction. Though you might not all arrive at the same destination. And since no time passes for you and your computer… how exactly do you decelerate again? If you are going the speed of light, then you ARE light. You have ceased to exist as a Lemmitor. There is no coming back.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 days ago

        You’ll need to accelerate to the light speed though, which will take time.

        So for the astronaut it’d take approximately a year to reach light speed if accelerating at 1G, and another year to slow down

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 days ago

          I mean if we’re already violating physics by having objects with mass going the speed of light, I don’t see what’s wrong with also assuming the thing we have for going light speed can’t also instantaneously accelerate.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 days ago

            I would think you’d have to instantaneously accelerate because incremental acceleration doesn’t work the way we typically think it does at high speeds.

            If you’re moving at 99.999% the speed of light relative to Earth, anything close to your speed is going to be moving quite slowly relative to you. When you accelerate some more, the change in speed relative to those close things is much larger than the change in speed you experience relative to Earth (it gets smaller and smaller as you approach light speed). But as far as I understand, there’s no such thing as moving at light speed relative to Earth but not relative to other sub-light speed things. You’d have to instantaneously move at light speed relative to everything (every sub-light speed thing).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 days ago

      Not the other way? You’d feel like you got there in an instant, while people on Earth needed to wait years?