@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agoTrump’s DOJ Brazenly Defies Judge’s Orders on Wrongly Deported Dadwww.thedailybeast.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1468cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1468external-linkTrump’s DOJ Brazenly Defies Judge’s Orders on Wrongly Deported Dadwww.thedailybeast.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square62fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareDominusOfMegadeuslinkfedilink9•1 month agoIt’s not guaranteed. The Marshalls ARE the enforcement mechanism for the courts. So the court needs to issue the order, and then the Marshalls have a decision to make.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 month agoIf the court deputizes someone since a DOJ Marshall won’t follow orders, is that new deputy under the DOJ or under the court?
minus-squareRymrgand's Daughter linkfedilink3•1 month agoCourt they’d only deputize someone they trusted anyway
minus-squareDominusOfMegadeuslinkfedilink1•1 month agoIt would be HIGHLY unusual for the courts to deputized anyone for this sort of thing. What authority would that individual even have?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agoThe same authority as a marshall as far as I know. They can do it if needed.
minus-squareDominusOfMegadeuslinkfedilink1•1 month ago The same authority as a marshall as far as I know. Sounds like incontestable legal justification to me. Let’s do this.
It’s not guaranteed. The Marshalls ARE the enforcement mechanism for the courts. So the court needs to issue the order, and then the Marshalls have a decision to make.
If the court deputizes someone since a DOJ Marshall won’t follow orders, is that new deputy under the DOJ or under the court?
Court they’d only deputize someone they trusted anyway
It would be HIGHLY unusual for the courts to deputized anyone for this sort of thing. What authority would that individual even have?
The same authority as a marshall as far as I know.
They can do it if needed.
Sounds like incontestable legal justification to me. Let’s do this.