• NoneOfUrBusiness
    link
    fedilink
    72 months ago

    Okay this was true until the DNC leadership election, but the current leadership leans just left enough that they could go either way.

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Except the chair has stated he is fine with bribes donations from “good billionaires”, so we all know it’s going to be the status quo again with them.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        42 months ago

        I mean if you believe in your own moral integrity and the work you’re doing it makes perfect sense to be willing in principle to accept billionaire money. Now I’m not saying he will or won’t be more of the same, but unless you’re a hardline leftist (which I don’t think anyone is expecting Ken Martin to be) the only correct answer to “will you accept billionaire money” is “yes”.

        • Deceptichum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The DNC’s issue isn’t a lack of money, they didn’t lose because they didn’t buy enough interviews with podcasters.

          They lost because outside of Bernie and the Squad, they had no ethics, basically stood for nothing, and at times outright accepted bribes to support genocide.

          The only correct answer is to grow a spine and say “no”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Right, which is why Ken Martins first act was to put the most centrist, business friendly, working with the far right focussed, uber zionist rebuttal person he could find to Trumps state of the union, Slotkin. he had to prostrate himself at the AIPAC altar first thing. Turning over a new leaf at the DNC, clearly. Things are all so different now. And look at how the new DLC is embracing progressives so warmly right now.