You determine if the subject is a victim or the aggressor depending on what narrative you shilling at that time.
TIL that understanding context is “shilling for a narrative.” 🙄
You know what’s really “disingenuous post modern subjectivist bullshit?” Pretending that victims become aggressors just because they act in their own self-defense. And that’s what the “not all men” whiners in this thread are doing.
Bad faith is applying the same bad rhetoric/logic to two groups and acting like it’s perfectly fine and reasonable in one instance but really awful in the other. Especially if one group is literally a subset of the other.
It’s not a “gotcha”, it’s an attempt to make you realize what you’re doing. “Men” as a group aren’t “the agressor”, neither are “black men”. Prejudice is bad, universally. No exceptions.
Is black man an aggressor or a victim?
Fuck off with your bad-faith ‘gotcha’ question.
You arguement has no logical foundation
You determine if the subject is a victim or the aggressor depending on what narrative you shilling at that time.
This is disingenuous post modern subjectivist bullshit
Cheers ;)
TIL that understanding context is “shilling for a narrative.” 🙄
You know what’s really “disingenuous post modern subjectivist bullshit?” Pretending that victims become aggressors just because they act in their own self-defense. And that’s what the “not all men” whiners in this thread are doing.
Bad faith is applying the same bad rhetoric/logic to two groups and acting like it’s perfectly fine and reasonable in one instance but really awful in the other. Especially if one group is literally a subset of the other.
It’s not a “gotcha”, it’s an attempt to make you realize what you’re doing. “Men” as a group aren’t “the agressor”, neither are “black men”. Prejudice is bad, universally. No exceptions.