• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2707 days ago

    I don’t know why this keeps getting posted everywhere. Workers have a lift limit the extra cost is for the extra person to handle the bag.

        • Shadowedcross
          link
          fedilink
          English
          287 days ago

          Get a load of this guy, he’s so impressive, always thinking of the right thing, first thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 days ago

          Depends on how shitty the company is. I’ve seen it a few times in a couple of decades of travel tbh

          • AnyOldName3
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 days ago

            The scanner’s part of security, which is potentially shared between multiple airlines with multiple cabin bag weight limits, so it wouldn’t make sense as the place to weigh things. It only works if it’s done somewhere airline-specific, like check-in or boarding.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 days ago

            In all airports that I’ve been through (all in Europe), the scanners for people + their carry-on luggage are from the customs agency, so from the government. They won’t check or enforce any airline weight limits there. The airline may still ask to check the weight of carry-on luggage at the gate, but I’ve never seen it as an automated process, only as spot checks.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 days ago

            Hmm, perhaps. Good point, but I’ve flown enough that I should have seen someone flagged for overweight bags.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 days ago

          Apparently a standard carry on is about 45 cm³, or 1.60 ft³. If you fill it with water, that would weigh about 45kg/100 lb.

          That would be a lot of 100ml containers…

        • Fleppensteyn
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 days ago

          Yes, often around 10 kg. Depends on the airline I guess. Though I never saw them check.

      • swab148
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 days ago

        They don’t want anyone trying to smuggle all those neutron star packages

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      257 days ago

      I’d also suspect humans on a plane will follow a normal distribution in terms of weight. The aircraft weight/loading is done on an average sized person (which used to be 75kg if I remember correctly). Conversely every motherfucker will load their luggage with as much shit as possible if it’s not limited.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      97 days ago

      If I pay an extra €50 to go from 19kg to 23kg, does the worker get paid more?

      Thought not.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          47 days ago

          So all suitcases between 19 and 23kg are loaded by 2 people at a time?

          Bullshit. It’s a fake cost and everyone knows it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            67 days ago

            It’s always just one guy yeeting the bags even when there’s 2 of them they never share a bag lol. The extra money pays for the pink heavy tag they put on there that no one listens to.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 days ago

            Ok, I didn’t realize I was talking to an operations manager for an airline. I was just clarifying the point made above.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 days ago

              No problem. I think you’ve illustrated perfectly how easy it is for airlines to dupe their customers with additional fake charges.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 days ago

                No, I demonstrated reading other comments and synthesizing their text into an easier form for those without reading skills. I am not arguing remotely the same point as you are.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  16 days ago

                  The result of your summary was the erroneous conclusion that the extra cost was for more manpower, demonstrating why the airlines are able to get away with making spurious extra costs.