• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2517 days ago

    I don’t know why this keeps getting posted everywhere. Workers have a lift limit the extra cost is for the extra person to handle the bag.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      227 days ago

      I’d also suspect humans on a plane will follow a normal distribution in terms of weight. The aircraft weight/loading is done on an average sized person (which used to be 75kg if I remember correctly). Conversely every motherfucker will load their luggage with as much shit as possible if it’s not limited.

        • Shadowedcross
          link
          fedilink
          English
          237 days ago

          Get a load of this guy, he’s so impressive, always thinking of the right thing, first thing.

        • Fleppensteyn
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 days ago

          Yes, often around 10 kg. Depends on the airline I guess. Though I never saw them check.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 days ago

          Apparently a standard carry on is about 45 cm³, or 1.60 ft³. If you fill it with water, that would weigh about 45kg/100 lb.

          That would be a lot of 100ml containers…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 days ago

          Depends on how shitty the company is. I’ve seen it a few times in a couple of decades of travel tbh

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 days ago

            Hmm, perhaps. Good point, but I’ve flown enough that I should have seen someone flagged for overweight bags.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 days ago

            In all airports that I’ve been through (all in Europe), the scanners for people + their carry-on luggage are from the customs agency, so from the government. They won’t check or enforce any airline weight limits there. The airline may still ask to check the weight of carry-on luggage at the gate, but I’ve never seen it as an automated process, only as spot checks.

          • AnyOldName3
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 days ago

            The scanner’s part of security, which is potentially shared between multiple airlines with multiple cabin bag weight limits, so it wouldn’t make sense as the place to weigh things. It only works if it’s done somewhere airline-specific, like check-in or boarding.

      • swab148
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 days ago

        They don’t want anyone trying to smuggle all those neutron star packages

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      87 days ago

      If I pay an extra €50 to go from 19kg to 23kg, does the worker get paid more?

      Thought not.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 days ago

          So all suitcases between 19 and 23kg are loaded by 2 people at a time?

          Bullshit. It’s a fake cost and everyone knows it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 days ago

            Ok, I didn’t realize I was talking to an operations manager for an airline. I was just clarifying the point made above.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 days ago

              No problem. I think you’ve illustrated perfectly how easy it is for airlines to dupe their customers with additional fake charges.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            57 days ago

            It’s always just one guy yeeting the bags even when there’s 2 of them they never share a bag lol. The extra money pays for the pink heavy tag they put on there that no one listens to.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              36 days ago

              Exactly. I can understand a maximum upper limit, but the cost bands below that are there only to maximise profits.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 days ago

          Who gets the money for that extra work?

          If baggage handlers were paid the extra bag fee people would be queuing round the airport to work there…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 days ago

            If the airport needs more baggage handlers on staff because there’s heavy 2 person luggage or just more luggage, they indirectly do get the money, because that’s how wages work.

            Although I’m sure that the airline will pocket some of the fee, which is obviously not cool, but that’s capitalism for you.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    496 days ago

    Time for me to say this again:

    THE WEIGHT LIMIT ON LUGGAGE IS TO PROTECT BAGGAGE HANDLERS FROM INJURY. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TAKE OFF OR LANDING WEIGHT.

      • Billegh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        66 days ago

        Yes. Can’t have them hurting themselves and causing delays because the airport won’t staff appropriately. Remember, safety is for controlling costs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 days ago

      If that’s all it is, then just slap a bright red tag on the over weight bags to warn the handlers. Right?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 days ago

        Now every single bag is overweight and they have to lift all of them all day. I suspect a few is ok but they really want to discourage too many of them so they are not lifting too many heavy weights all day.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 days ago

          I believe that after 50lbs it becomes a team lift and requires 2 people to lift the bag. Which 1 person can do but when hunched over in the belly of the plane it becomes harder and more likely to injure one’s back.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    155
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    OSHA.

    The throwers have a union to stop them from killing themselves, which means we don’t give them 40kg things to break their backs regularly and anything over 22kgs they buddy lift or get a hoist or something.

    Thought it was just airlines being airlines too, but this makes complete sense, don’t be dicks about other people’s health.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      487 days ago

      i was in favor of total weight based pricing, but this changed my mind.

      may the backs of the people kicking around my luggage be in perfect health

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        247 days ago

        Same, went from ‘you greedy mother-fuckers’ to ‘I am right with you fam’.

        Amazed they don’t explain it more, it makes them actually seem human for once.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          147 days ago

          because airlines do not actually care about their workers and just comply with the regulations half assedly. they cannot fathom compassion for human resources or assume milking it would backfire.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 days ago

            I mean, airlines are people too, and among the most unionized industries.

            They’re both soulless and actually human at the same time.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    477 days ago

    I’ve always assumed you pay extra because multiple people have to carry the bag around after you check it, and that’s harder/more dangerous at higher weights.

    In warehouses, you gotta go get your lift belt and often a partner if something is over a certain weight, and you aren’t covered by workman’s comp if you just try to do it quickly without those, so it’s a serious hassle.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      127 days ago

      I always assumed it was more about the conveyors and such your bag goes through before even getting to those folks. Heavier bags mean more wear and tear and maintenance on those machines.

      Honestly, it’s probably a little bit of both along with just deterring some cohort of people from bringing too much stuff because they don’t want to pay the fees.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        107 days ago

        The extra fuel cost doesn’t even remotely compare to the cost of an injured baggage handler and their lost wages.

        • BarqsHasBite
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 days ago

          Using that logic, the extra charge doesn’t come close to the cost of an injured baggage handler and their lost wages. If that was the reason, they would reject it outright or split it into multiple bags.

            • BarqsHasBite
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 days ago

              Do we really expect they do that for baggage handlers? When it’s 2 pounds over. Do they mark overweight bags with big hazard signs so the handlers know?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                57 days ago

                Yes, they do. If you’ve ever worked a physical job, there are safety procedures and regulations enforced by OSHA and unions. If it’s 2 pounds over, you go get a second person for the lift because if you decide to break procedure and then injure yourself, you’re not covered by the union and/or workman’s comp insurance. In some places it’s an automatic firing if you break safety procedure, and any manager forcing people to break procedure will be in deep shit.

                Story time: I have a good friend who was a baggage handler and got stuck in a situation where their boss forced them to handle overweight baggage without a second person. She blew out her knee, has had multiple surguries, and has had to testify in court multiple times, including for a law suit that ended up giving her a sizable settlement check.

                • BarqsHasBite
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 days ago

                  No no no not other jobs. This one job specifically: airplane baggage handler. And I’m not talking massively overweight bags which sounds like your friend, I’m talking the 1 and 2 pound overweight. Are they marked with massive hazard signs so everyone knows it’s 1 pound over.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    “Any time you think it’s not about the money, it’s about the money.”

    Mahatma Gandhi
    
    • _cryptagion [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 days ago

      No, it’s about baggage handlers not wanting to have to load your heavy ass luggage when they have a whole planes worth to get to.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 days ago

        They’ll gladly take your overweight bag if you give them extra…money. The airlines don’t care about baggage handlers.

  • Chozo
    link
    fedilink
    127 days ago

    Y’all, the overhead bins and the seats have different weight ratings. If has nothing to do with the overall weight of the plane, they just don’t want the bins to come crashing down on your head mid-flight.

      • Chozo
        link
        fedilink
        37 days ago

        My carry-ons have always gotten weighed, as well as my checked bags. I’ve not flown in about 15 years, so maybe that’s not as common now?

        • BarqsHasBite
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          If was about overhead bins collapsing, they would reject the carry on bag and not just charge extra.

          • Chozo
            link
            fedilink
            17 days ago

            The sign says “max”, so I figured this is referring to weight capacity and not cost.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 days ago

        The checked bag weight limit is to protect the worker who has to lift 100s of bags per day.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    117 days ago

    Y’all, these comments are not it. How are you more upset about fat people than how the airlines have given all our leg room and storage space to first class/business class?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      107 days ago

      The problem also exists on planes that don’t have separate classes. It’s not directly about class warfare in this case.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    177 days ago

    How is that logical that the man should pay extra cause he’s bigger/taller but small people should get extra luggage bonus?

    Not even taking into account that this very short lady will be far more comfortable during the flight than the gentleman.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 days ago

      Adding to that, people need to load all those suitcases in. The man doesn’t get carried into the plane.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      246 days ago

      Its not logical - Weight limits aren’t there for the flight, they’re there so the luggage handlers don’t injure themselves

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 days ago

        Weight limits are critical for the flight. An overweight plane can fail to take off. The more weight in passengers a plane carries, the more weight in fuel they need to add. This extra fuel weight also requires more fuel to carry it. And so on and so on.

        There’s a tipping point with weight of passengers and cargo combined with flight duration where the plane becomes uneconomical to fly. Planes have crashed on takeoff because they were overweight but the weight was miscalculated. Temperature and weather also play a role.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 days ago

        Of course… What airline companies are most concerned about is the well being of their luggage handlers.

        Even if they claim that this is one of the reasons, it’s a by product of cost management.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    216 days ago

    Can I get the exact same picture but with an obese fat woman and a sexy male athlete, please? Or would that be inappropriate?

    • Midnight Wolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 days ago

      “One second, I just need to update some details before I can give you your boarding pass…”

      types into the terminal ‘customer wouldn’t let me weigh them, probably a fat fuck, recommend full body search at security checkpoint for contraband meals and soda’

      “Here you go, sorry about the delay, have a lovely day”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    106 days ago

    Tell ya what. Make it as easy for me to pop off a pound as it is for someone else to take a hair dryer out of their luggage and I will happily pay for all the extra boobs I bring on board after I remove the weight everywhere else.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    377 days ago

    No matter what size you are, you can wear a jacket with as many pockets as you want. Travel cheaper by looking like an vaudeville ex-army doomsday prepper with all your underwear stuffed into pockets of oversized cargo pants, three layers of socks and an entire towel as a toga shirt over your other shirts.

    Pro-tip: If you have a greasy paper bag they’ll think it’s food and won’t charge you for a carry-on.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      107 days ago

      Dude, I barely fit in the seats now with my phone in my pocket and you want me to carry a weeks worth of clothing and travel sized toiletries on my person?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I did that once with camera gear. I stuffed lenses in all my pockets because my carry on bag was too heavy. “There, 5 kg off, happy ?”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 days ago

      I’m always cold when flying, so I just layer up. Jeans, sweatpants, short sleeve, long sleeve, sweater, jacket, hat. Then, I put various items in my various pockets. Phone, earbuds, snack bars, bar of soap, small articles of clothing, maybe a tshirt in my jacket pocket, a shoe in each sweatpants pocket. The rest goes in my carry on, no luggage fees.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 days ago

        You must be the person who’s always in front of me at the line for the security scanners!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    347 days ago

    Well, no employee is going to be expected to physically lift me and every other passenger at any point, but they will have to lift all of our checked baggage, so it feels like my weight matters less than my luggage’s weight.

    • Midnight Wolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 days ago

      I don’t want to “well actually” but I’m disabled and need to be pushed in my chair through the airport and to + down the gate corridor. Every time I arrive at the plane door, someone greets me from the plane and asks “do you need help (boarding the plane)”. Luckily I can hobble with my cane for short distances, so I don’t need to be carried like I’m going to the bedroom in a romcom, but they do have staff that can aid with that…

      Now I’m imagining a plane full of disabled people all being carried. Boarding time, 11a, departure, 3p. 😋

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        That’s fair. Now I wonder how liability works with that since they could hurt themselves and you in the process. And surely they are people that just cannot be lifted by one person.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46 days ago

    Energy scarcity and our atmosphere could be helped by charging by the kilo gram. There are people who take it as an incentive to get as close as possible to the limit, increasing the weight of the loaded aircraft!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 days ago

      It isn’t about the weight of the aircraft but the person loading the luggage in the belly of the aircraft.