The March 14 directive, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, uses an obscure 18th-century law — the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — to give law enforcement nationwide the power to bypass basic constitutional protections.

According to the memo, agents can break into a home if getting a warrant is “impracticable,” and they don’t need a judge’s approval. Instead, immigration officers can sign their own administrative warrants. The bar for action is low — a “reasonable belief” that someone might be part of a Venezuelan gang is enough.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    610 days ago

    I’ll be damned as well.

    Worth noting for any Californians that it u-turns if the person stops being a threat. If you threaten and they run away, you’re now in the wrong if you shoot.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 days ago

      That’s true pretty much everywhere. Shooting someone in the back will almost always get you charged, unless you’re a cop.

      Generally speaking–and I’m not a lawyer, I’m not your lawyer, and you should ask a criminal defense attorney in your state for specifics–you can use force, including lethal force, to protect your life if you have reasonable fear for your life or safety. Generally speaking, if someone is running away from you, they’re no longer a direct threat, and therefore you can’t use force. Similarly, if you are in a reasonable fear for your life, and you shoot someone, you can not kick them while they’re bleeding on the ground.

      I believe all states have some form of Castle Doctrine. Some states have a duty to retreat if you aren’t in your home/car, e.g., you have to attempt to escape first. Some states require you to use proportionate force; if they have a baseball bat, you may not be allowed to use a firearm. Know the laws specific to your state.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 days ago

        That’s all fair enough. I’ve seen it listed as a gotcha on some very pro-gun sites for the specific case of a thief who’s taken something, jewelery for example, and is now running away. You can’t take the offensive to get it back. (At least not with your gun. I expect trackling them to the ground would be fine?)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 days ago

          That gets much, much more state specific. I can tell you that a lot of stores with loss-prevention officers aren’t keen on having them tackle shoplifters, since that can result in massive losses from lawsuits.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 days ago

      If you pull out a firearm you better fucking use it not threaten with it. because life and death is when it comes out not before.

      In some states you have a duty to retreat as well. Something to consider.

      • Norah (pup/it/she)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 days ago

        I thought the whole point of Castle Doctrine is that you don’t have to retreat because your home is the place of last retreat?