@[email protected] to Comic [email protected]English • 2 months agoISO 8601slrpnk.netimagemessage-square246fedilinkarrow-up11.12K
arrow-up11.12KimageISO 8601slrpnk.net@[email protected] to Comic [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square246fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoNo! It’s the other way around, from largest to smallest is a mess and it makes no sense
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•2 months agoIf you name files or other data with ISO 8601 then they’re always sorted chronologically when you go largest to smallest.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•2 months agoI know, right! I’ve been campaigning for this for everyday numbers. For example, twenty seven should be written smallest first: 72. Likewise this year is 5202, and next year 6202. That way no-one’s going to be confused at all.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•2 months agoSo true, bestie! That’s why all the clocks in my house are formatted ss:mm:hh
No! It’s the other way around, from largest to smallest is a mess and it makes no sense
If you name files or other data with ISO 8601 then they’re always sorted chronologically when you go largest to smallest.
I know, right! I’ve been campaigning for this for everyday numbers. For example, twenty seven should be written smallest first: 72. Likewise this year is 5202, and next year 6202. That way no-one’s going to be confused at all.
What you said is stupid
So true, bestie! That’s why all the clocks in my house are formatted ss:mm:hh