• Lovable Sidekick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 months ago

    Is there an ISO standard for how to say, “I don’t agree with a very specific aspect of your politics, or a specific statement one of your political heroes made, for a very specific reason, but I’m not declaring myself at the extreme horrible kitten-eating end of whatever political spectrum you live in.”

    • baltakatei
      link
      fedilink
      73 months ago

      “Policies that destroy the biosphere are discouraged.” — ISO-0000

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    63 months ago

    I’m working in an international company with colleagues around the world. To avoid confusion, I switched to using this format:

    27-FEB-2013

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      I deal with a lot of old records and boy I really prefer iso when you have to look at a lot of dates and things are in all different years, it’s helpful. Have you tried ISO? I also do a lot of international work and haven’t heard complaints about it being confusing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        I honestly prefer ISO, but as soon as a US colleague is involved, things get messy. That’s my experience from the last 10 years or so.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    483 months ago

    There are several people in the comments saying they have to use 27 Feb 2013 because they work with people all over the world. I’m really confused - what does that solve that 2013-02-13 does not? I know that not every language spells months the English way so “Dec” or “May” aren’t universal. Is there some country that regularly puts year day month that would break using ISO 8601 or RFC 3339?

    • dragon-donkey3374
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      When someone asks you what date it is, no one says it’s 2025 May 5th. We all know what year it is, and we all know what month we are in. It’s the day component that is usually the unknown.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        73 months ago

        That’s locality of reference, though, similar to how you can say “here” or “there” for spatial coordinates. Everybody is aware of the year and month, so you omit it as given. The order of significance is still year, month, day.

        Imagine if a harried time traveler jumped out of their time machine and asked you the date. Would it make sense to say, “Why, it’s the 1st.” (Or more possible, if a friend awoke from a coma.) If you ask somebody when they were born, most people will give the year at minimum. Of course, there are some weirdos out there, and you recognize them when you ask when they were born, and they say, “on a Tuesday.” Same for the date of the Norman invasion of Great Britain. If you don’t already have some sense of history, then knowing it happened about the 20th isn’t very edifying.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        173 months ago

        we all know what month we are in

        Literally had two coworkers today that did not realize it was May

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          43 months ago

          Guilty of that myself this very day. I did it a very spectacular way too. Some coworkers came up to me and said “man, April was a busy month for you!” I boldly replied “and it ain’t even over yet!” I was promptly corrected.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        93 months ago

        Writing dates is usually in order to keep track for the future, when the year and month may be different.

    • Lovable Sidekick
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It solves the familiarity problem, when getting somebody to do something by a date they readily understand at a glance takes precedence over making everybody in the world change a lifelong habit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      383 months ago

      I think learning all abbreviations for different months in different languages is more complicated than just learning that the time is sorted from largest to smallest unit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        No! It’s the other way around, from largest to smallest is a mess and it makes no sense

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          93 months ago

          I know, right! I’ve been campaigning for this for everyday numbers. For example, twenty seven should be written smallest first: 72. Likewise this year is 5202, and next year 6202. That way no-one’s going to be confused at all.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          133 months ago

          If you name files or other data with ISO 8601 then they’re always sorted chronologically when you go largest to smallest.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      153 months ago

      27 Feb 2013 is unambiguous- regardless of where you’re from or how you write your dates, you can’t confuse 2013 for the month or day, you can’t confuse Feb for a day or week, and if you can’t figure 27 out, then we have bigger problems!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        27 Feb is no more or less ambiguous than 02-27. The problems are when you choose a proper example, like 03/02

      • I used to work for a company that agreed with you, well at least some clown in management did. Even though it was an Australian company, at least part of the problem was we had an office in Manila, and they speak “American English” which seemed to include the awful date system too. We dealt with a lot of files being issued to clients / received from vendors etc. Because the “official” system used those fucked up dates, everyone ran their own secondary sets of data folders in / out with everything done in ISO dates so you could actually sort it properly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        Which I was the justification used when my work decided to use 2025-May-01.

        It’s close enough to the iso date that nobody will be confused but with that 1 extra layer of security blanket to separate months and days.

        Of course, that does ruin sorting, so I think it was a bit silly, nobody has ever used yyyymmdd so it’s all a bit theoretical to me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        283 months ago

        2013-02-27 is also unambiguous unless you’re aware of a country that uses year day month, is not?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          2013-02-27 is also unambiguous.

          Hey what’s today’s date?

          It’s 2025 -

          No like the DAY?

          Yeah, it’s 2025, 02 -

          Not the month, the day - What’s today’s actual date?

          Like I was saying, if you’d let me finish, “2025 - 02 - 27”

          I’m mostly joking, but when it comes to info about dates, I think the most evctive format it one that organizes the information within a heirachy that provides follow up answers.

          Formatting dates as day / month / year does just that. Provides the day it is, followed by the month and year as that is the order that information is usually needed in.

          I find providing the year first (or month) is much more ambiguous as neither are the day the actual date falls on.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            If you need to ask for the current date so often, I suggest getting a watch. (not sure if joking vs predisposed for this part)

            If you’re asking so often about recent things then, yes, hearing the redundant parts out loud is only irksome because they’ve already been delivered to you (by yourself).

            On the other hand, if you’re asking someone when an arbitrary event happened (e.g. when reminiscing), having the year first quickens context.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            113 months ago

            We need to get rid of the month/day and just refer to days by number. Today is day 121 in the year 2025, it’s super clear.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              I was said that western mindset goes from small scale to larger scale, like 02-05-2025. Hmm, maybe that’s West vs East propaganda material?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            43 months ago

            Counterpoint: What you say applies in daily life, not when querying an archive of any kind. Year-month-day is the natural sorting order if the question is “which file/folder/column in the spreadsheet is the one I need?” In which case you narrow it down to first the year, then the month, then the day.

            I started using YYYY-MM-DD to name files and directories once I noticed that they then became automatically sorted chronologically when I sort the containing directory alphabetically by file name.

      • m-p{3}
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        Acquiring the document (legally) to ensure compliance for ISO 8601 is relatively expensive for a single person (~$200 USD), while RFC 3339 is accessible for free.

    • m_‮f
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      Do you mean the post titles? I’ve been using the same format as was used since before I took over posting, but if people want ISO format that works for me

        • m_‮f
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          Posting in ISO format now, we’ll see if there’s any objections

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53 months ago

    In the last company I work for, the department was created from zero, and my boss just let me take all the technical decisions so from the begging everything was wrote in ISO-8601. When I left it was just the way it was, if you try to use any other date format anywhere something is going to give you an error.

  • Cid Vicious
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1763 months ago

    Rich is right, since this is the date format that sorts correctly in filenames.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        43 months ago

        If humanity survives until then, we can implement 9-digit dates and delay the problem until Y100K.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        153 months ago

        If I, my software, or my data last this long, I will have nearly 8000 years to resolve it. Which is to say, the year 9998 is going to get busy.

        • BigFig
          link
          fedilink
          English
          363 months ago

          Can’t wait for the Y40k bug, when Tyranids begin to infect our brains.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        I’d be curious to see a sorting algorithm that doesn’t handle YYYYY-MM-DD with YYYY-MM-DD properly. If you drop the dashes you still get a proper numeric order. If you sort by component, you still get the proper order. Maybe a string sort wouldn’t? Off the top of my head the languages I’m thinking either put longer strings later, giving us the proper order, or could put 1YYYY- ahead of 1YYY-M so maybe string sorting is the only one that’s out.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Lexical sorting (string sorting/alphabetical order sorting) is what I believe they were referring to when talking about file names.

          The fact that you don’t have to do any parsing of the string at all, just do a straight character-by-character alphabetical sort, and they will be sorted by date, is a great benifit of this date scheme. That means in situations where no special parsing is set up (eg, in a File Explorer windows showing a folders contents sorted alphabetically) or where your string isn’t strictly date only (eg, a file name format such as ‘2025-05-02 - Project 3.pdf’) you can still have everything sorted by date just by sorting alphabetically.

          Its this benifit that is lost when rolling over to 5-digit years.

          • The_Decryptor
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            It’s an easy fix at least, just check if you’re comparing numbers on both sides and switch to a simple numerical sort.

            I think Windows used to get this wrong, but it was fixed so long ago that I’m not even sure now.

          • JackbyDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            I bet you could make a one liner to rename files with YYYY-MM-DD to 0YYYY-MM-DD fairly easily. Not a problem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        173 months ago

        Can be solved with a small shellscript adding a leading zero to all filenames with the format.

        • bean
          link
          fedilink
          63 months ago

          I feel called out and I’m hiding in the bushes reading comments.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            It’s called feeling seen and finding you’re not alone. Do you type "# " while screen sharing in work apps to no avail and the chagrin of colleagues? It’s okay. Me too.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            33 months ago

            I’ve never met a fellow Templatr in the wild lol

            My daily note broke and my life fell apart for a minute.

            Have you also spent months building your Data Capture Workflow mermaid.js? 😅😬

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 months ago

              Not quite months, but definitely weeks 😂 Obsidian can be such a rabbit hole. If I tweak that last template one more time, then I’ll finally be done, I swear!

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                13 months ago

                So I’m like 80% done with my setup. Mostly focused on routine and habit templates, homepage wiki for pkm etc… between the plugins and css, no matter which device I’m on, it’s the slowest app I’ve ever used. This is why I pushed my old setup and started over clean with more knowledge. I don’t know how to get the customization I want without insane unusable lag

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      83 months ago

      Omg thank you!! Everyone sees my notes thinks I’m crazy for obsessing… It’s the correct fucking sort!

  • partial_accumen
    link
    fedilink
    153 months ago

    I regularly work with Americans, Canadians, and Europeans. So many times each group defaults to their own format and mistakes occur I gave up on all the formats listed by OP. If i have to write a date in correspondence its like: Feb 27th 2013. No ambiguity. No one has ever challenged me on it either. It is universally understood.

    • Mr. Satan
      link
      fedilink
      63 months ago

      Jokes on you, I can’t fucking rember which English month is which. April, May, July and Autum is just a grey mass to me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        Autumn is a season lol

        I think you mean August.

        September, October, November and December are easy to remember because they’re Roman numbers. 7-10 But two off because at some point they added July and August to honor Julius Augustus. So “month seven” is the 9th month.

        • Mr. Satan
          link
          fedilink
          33 months ago

          Honestly I do remember some months, like starting and ending of the year. I don’t encounter English month names on a regular enough basis to remember their order and my month names in no way relate to English ones.

          So anything after February and before August I have to google each time I encounter them.

          It doesn’t help that we don’t even have month abbreviations like English does (Jan, Feb, etc.).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      63 months ago

      You meant 27th Feb 2013, right? It is utterly moronic to have day in the middle irrespectively if you start with or finish on the year.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        I assume it depends on geographical region, but I’ve never heard someone say out loud “27th of February, 2013.” It’s always “February 27th, 2013.” Writing it down like that could be easier to parse for people who are used to that format

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            No, I’m American

            I want to get ahead of this debate, and point out that a) “American” as a demonym for literally anyone in the western hemisphere is largely useless, b) the USA is the only country which includes “America” in its name, and c) USian is not more precise because there are two countries with United States in their name.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                No, I’m American. It looks like you started writing this comment before I made the edit to mine, so I’ll go ahead and copy/paste it here

                a) “American” as a demonym for literally anyone in the western hemisphere is largely useless, b) the USA is the only country which includes “America” in its name, and c) USian is not more precise because there are two countries with United States in their name.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 months ago

                  So, you are a USian. I thought so. I never ever heard someone saying “February 27th 2018”, I think only USians do that. Everywhere else it is 27th of February 2018 which is logical.

      • partial_accumen
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        You meant 27th Feb 2013, right?

        Does it matter anymore with this format? You figured out the exact day, month, and year irrespective of the order.

        • shrugs
          link
          fedilink
          53 months ago

          It’s not about understanding. It’s about sorting,

          Everybody understand both notations, but if you use it for filenames sorting is important. Natural sorting order is an important feature that should be considered.

          day month year is just stupid in that regard. Not only does the of the month depend on the language, but also if sorted you get the first of every month grouped together.

          • partial_accumen
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            “Moronic” before and now “stupid”. Folks are very passionate about their date formats.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            If you’re listing dates, then using a sortable format is ideal. But if you’re just referencing one in the middle of a correspondence, it’s best to use whatever format the recipient is most familiar with. No one is sorting emails by a date given in the third paragraph

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        My biggest point of professional pride was the time my boss sent a mass group text to all his employees asking them to format dates the way I do

        He didn’t say it was the format I used, so I didn’t speak up and say “it’s actually ISO-8601,” because I assume my coworkers who were used to writing things like “February 27 8:00-4:45” rather than “2013-02-27 8:00-4:45 (8:45)” may stab me

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    323 months ago

    My goodness, some of the comments in here must come from people who thought that those writing the standard were morons who did no research.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      I don’t think they’re morons…just slaves to convention and compatibility. Not many ways to get away from that and justify it.