- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/43737535
cross-posted from: https://quokk.au/post/5652540
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/43737535
cross-posted from: https://quokk.au/post/5652540
Def sounds like the trail of evidence is weak.
Unless the racoon was caged or on a lead. Surly the defence will claim it found the stuff and dragged it into the car.
Even if the driver has a history etc. seems the racoon is all sorts of reasonable doubt.
She’s cooked bro. She has paperwork claiming the raccoon as a pet and it holding a meth pipe on bodycam allowed probable cause to justify the search. Fuck the police but they’re unfortunately probably going to get the conviction.
Furthermore:
The possibility of the pipe-wielding raccoon having acquired the pipe independently and without the driver’s knowledge doesn’t invalidate the search that found all the drugs. The active warrant is enough.