• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 months ago

    I don’t see them, because I don’t go to wikipedia links and look for a needle in a haystack to support your argument.

    You provide the links to the laws that you think support your argument.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      my argument? Lol no. Also it’s not a needle in a hay stack, everything is neatly listed at the bottom haha.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        What Tool_Shed said. Wikipedia isn’t a source, it’s a reference. Links to the sources are included in the Wikipedia page. If you are refusing to look at the links then you are simply a troll. You don’t care to read the truth. You are more interested in spreading MAGA bullshit. There are 58 sources at the bottom of the page, many of which include links to state legislature websites and specific laws you can read yourself. You aren’t a freedom advocate you are a troll and not a very bright one.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        You’re arguing that I should go and find my own examples of something that I am arguing isn’t happening, rather than the person making the argument that it is providing actual examples. That’s not how conversations and arguments work.

        The original person, or yourself, can provide evidence to back up the original claim. It’s not my job to go and guess what exact part of what link you’re talking about.

        my argument?

        You as in the person who is making the argument.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          You’re arguing that I should go and find my own examples of something that I am arguing isn’t happening, rather than the person making the argument that it is providing actual examples. That’s not how conversations and arguments work.

          No, I’m not, I’m saying look at the sources provided to you

          The original person, or yourself, can provide evidence to back up the original claim. It’s not my job to go and guess what exact part of what link you’re talking about.

          It’s there, the entire wiki is about the subject

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            And I’m saying that Wikipedia is not a source, and that I’m not going to go to a wikipedia page and then look for the specific source(s) that the person thinks proves their point when there could be 50 different articles linked on that page.

            Show me a source for a LAW that the current US government has passed making it illegal to say that gay people exist. Go.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                Show me a source. Wikipedia is not a source. Show me 1 specific example of a law that is “gay erasure” please. That’s not too much to ask, surely?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  Tell you what, go to that wiki, scroll down and take a gander at the part that says “reference” and let me know what you see? That’s not too much to ask, surely?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    12 months ago

                    Show me a source. Wikipedia is not a source. Show me 1 specific example of a law that is “gay erasure” please. That’s not too much to ask, surely?