A Conservative MP is giving up his seat to allow Pierre Poilievre to run in a byelection after Prime Minister Mark Carney said he’d be ready to call one 'as soon as possible.'
You’re arguing that I should go and find my own examples of something that I am arguing isn’t happening, rather than the person making the argument that it is providing actual examples. That’s not how conversations and arguments work.
The original person, or yourself, can provide evidence to back up the original claim. It’s not my job to go and guess what exact part of what link you’re talking about.
You’re arguing that I should go and find my own examples of something that I am arguing isn’t happening, rather than the person making the argument that it is providing actual examples. That’s not how conversations and arguments work.
No, I’m not, I’m saying look at the sources provided to you
The original person, or yourself, can provide evidence to back up the original claim. It’s not my job to go and guess what exact part of what link you’re talking about.
And I’m saying that Wikipedia is not a source, and that I’m not going to go to a wikipedia page and then look for the specific source(s) that the person thinks proves their point when there could be 50 different articles linked on that page.
Show me a source for a LAW that the current US government has passed making it illegal to say that gay people exist. Go.
Tell you what, go to that wiki, scroll down and take a gander at the part that says “reference” and let me know what you see? That’s not too much to ask, surely?
Tell you what, go to that wiki, scroll down and take a gander at the part that says “reference” and let me know what you see? That’s not too much to ask, surely?
You’re arguing that I should go and find my own examples of something that I am arguing isn’t happening, rather than the person making the argument that it is providing actual examples. That’s not how conversations and arguments work.
The original person, or yourself, can provide evidence to back up the original claim. It’s not my job to go and guess what exact part of what link you’re talking about.
You as in the person who is making the argument.
No, I’m not, I’m saying look at the sources provided to you
It’s there, the entire wiki is about the subject
And I’m saying that Wikipedia is not a source, and that I’m not going to go to a wikipedia page and then look for the specific source(s) that the person thinks proves their point when there could be 50 different articles linked on that page.
Show me a source for a LAW that the current US government has passed making it illegal to say that gay people exist. Go.
The sources are there, gay erasure is happening. I can’t learn it for you.
Show me a source. Wikipedia is not a source. Show me 1 specific example of a law that is “gay erasure” please. That’s not too much to ask, surely?
Tell you what, go to that wiki, scroll down and take a gander at the part that says “reference” and let me know what you see? That’s not too much to ask, surely?
Last chance then I’ll correctly assume that there are no sources on there that support the “gay erasure” argument.