• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    499 days ago

    Even if you consider each Chinese dynasty to be a distinct nation (I wouldn’t, but even if you did) there are several dynasties that lasted well over 250 years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 days ago

      I’m curious why you wouldn’t consider many of the Chinese dynasties their own countries, in a way?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        88 days ago

        The culture and history are largely consistent, including after Confucius the bureaucratic structure, which survived through many dynasties until Mao, and even the communist revolution didn’t completely wipe the influence of Confucius.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 days ago

          I feel like similar things could be said of many places in the world, but surely you wouldn’t consider, say, the country of India to stretch as far back? Or Italy? Turkey?

          Even sticking with China, surely the mongol led Yuan dynasty is worth separating from before and after it, if you’re considering modern borders. Like, does Mongolia get the same claim as China does in that case for oldest country? It kinda becomes a fuzzy question to me. There’s got to be a better academically defined way.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 days ago

            India probably, yeah. Italy as a national identity didn’t exist until 1861, and Germany until 1871, and there are still regions in both countries with strong identities like Bavaria. Culture outlasts constitutions.