Track_Shovel to Microblog [email protected]English • 2 months agoDouble standardsslrpnk.netimagemessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up11.01K
arrow-up11.01KimageDouble standardsslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Microblog [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square129fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoThat’s not what her account said at all. You’re making up a narrative that doesn’t exist.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoNo, that’s literally what she said. Get some reading comprehension ffs. HR talked to her instead of the boss who made the rude comment. Read it as many times as you need…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoSorry mate all the comments in this thread are asserting different things. The screen cap says HR spoke to her. You’re saying that means that they’ve taken the supervisors side. That would expose the company to a legal claim, which is the antithesis of what every other comment here says HR is supposed to do.
That’s not what her account said at all. You’re making up a narrative that doesn’t exist.
No, that’s literally what she said. Get some reading comprehension ffs. HR talked to her instead of the boss who made the rude comment. Read it as many times as you need…
Sorry mate all the comments in this thread are asserting different things.
The screen cap says HR spoke to her.
You’re saying that means that they’ve taken the supervisors side.
That would expose the company to a legal claim, which is the antithesis of what every other comment here says HR is supposed to do.