@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 months agoA VPN Company Canceled All Lifetime Subscriptions, Claiming It Didn’t Know About Themwww.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square155fedilinkarrow-up1697
arrow-up1697external-linkA VPN Company Canceled All Lifetime Subscriptions, Claiming It Didn’t Know About Themwww.wired.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square155fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoSo you’d rather they just close the company down, so then no one can use their VPN. Big brain move.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoThe people operating the company do not deserve to run it. Maybe they should declare bankruptcy and let somebody who will honor the contracts buy it. Allowing this kind of anti-consumer behaviour just allows them to juggle the company around to get out of contracts.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoOK so you’re against the sale of the company in the first place? That’s a different story.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoYes I think they should just honor the contracts and make a tiny bit less profit. They could even just add some sane limits if those were not present yet.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-22 months agoYou have no idea about why they sold or how the financials of the business were. Of the contracts stated that the offer could be changed at the company’s choosing, are you ok with it then?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoSorry bud but I’m not going to continue replying to you because of your condescending tone. Are you ok with that?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-22 months agoI don’t care if you reply or not, it just makes you look like you can’t defend/support your position to even the most basic of questioning.
So you’d rather they just close the company down, so then no one can use their VPN. Big brain move.
The people operating the company do not deserve to run it. Maybe they should declare bankruptcy and let somebody who will honor the contracts buy it.
Allowing this kind of anti-consumer behaviour just allows them to juggle the company around to get out of contracts.
OK so you’re against the sale of the company in the first place? That’s a different story.
Yes I think they should just honor the contracts and make a tiny bit less profit.
They could even just add some sane limits if those were not present yet.
You have no idea about why they sold or how the financials of the business were.
Of the contracts stated that the offer could be changed at the company’s choosing, are you ok with it then?
Sorry bud but I’m not going to continue replying to you because of your condescending tone. Are you ok with that?
I don’t care if you reply or not, it just makes you look like you can’t defend/support your position to even the most basic of questioning.