• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 days ago

    If someone draws a conclusion from the facts it could be biased, but this is just merely data. You could say that it is framing a certain set of results, (since it doesn’t say anything about how pleasant a trip by car is compared to a trip by bicycle for example), but the collection data seems to done perfectly neutral.

    • comfy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      If someone draws a conclusion from the facts

      The title is framing the statistics with the implication that bike lanes and car restrictions are the cause.

      (Fuck electric cars)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 days ago

        No I totally agree but it would be framing which is not the same as being biased, and the title implies a causation but doesn’t actually say there is one. Also could have kept quiet because i don’t really disagree with op.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 days ago

        I kinda agree . For all we know it might be also fasing out of fossil fuel based heating ( For example the reason for massive improvments of air quality in some cities in Poland is banning of old coal based heating , not banning of cars ). But im not french and i dont know if individual heating using coal or gas furnaces was ever the norm there. Also i think 2007 is a few years after euro 4 emmissions were created , so thats also a signifiact improvment on its own as pepole move slowly from older to newer cars . Basicaly i wouldn’t put all my eggs in one basket. Its probably a combination of multiple factors