@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 2 months agoLet's play this game againsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square885fedilinkarrow-up1438
arrow-up1438imageLet's play this game againsh.itjust.works@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 2 months agomessage-square885fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months agoI agree. Superheros are best when defined by what they CAN’T do.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months agoFor the really powerful ones, but for instance I think spider man is better defined by what he CAN do, which is actually a pretty small list.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 months agoI think Spider-man has the heart of a more powerful hero, and his limited power set is his restriction. He constantly punches above his weight, giving him an underdog status that’s VERY appealing, as evidenced by his popularity.
minus-squareColonel PaniclinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoSuperman can’t be around Kryptonite and Batman can’t be around his parents.
I agree. Superheros are best when defined by what they CAN’T do.
For the really powerful ones, but for instance I think spider man is better defined by what he CAN do, which is actually a pretty small list.
I think Spider-man has the heart of a more powerful hero, and his limited power set is his restriction.
He constantly punches above his weight, giving him an underdog status that’s VERY appealing, as evidenced by his popularity.
Superman can’t be around Kryptonite and Batman can’t be around his parents.