• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    302 days ago

    I’ve seen this article by so many different sites at least twice a day for the past 3 weeks. I get that people want to be optimistic and I totally wanna know what happened. However, I’d much rather wait for more information instead of recycling the same information every day. There is definitely something fishy going on here, but so far it’s barely above a conspiracy theory at this point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        72 days ago

        Thank you, I really appreciate it. This is more of what I’m talking about. Post something like this instead of a random “feel good” article that has less than two paragraphs and a catchy headline.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      202 days ago

      Yeah, only bcz the trump administration yelled and squaked incessantly for 4 years that the election was rigged. So, saying something fishy happened is now seen as ridiculous bcz they filed so many damn frivolous lawsuits last time as to turn it into a god damn joke.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 days ago

        And while I don’t disagree with you, I just want new information to come out and for something to actually happen instead of just the general vibe of hope by seeing the same story every day. I want this just as bad as anyone else, but I also want something to hold onto. I can’t hold onto the same spreadsheet of a few counties in New York from a month ago.

        • Mearuu
          link
          fedilink
          22 days ago

          You say you want something to happen… The title of the article mentions the case moving forward. The first sentence of the article says

          A lawsuit disputing the results of the 2024 election has moved forward

          There is something happening. Did you not comprehend the title or read the article?

          • taco
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 days ago

            This article’s a week old already. The lawsuit was “moving forward” and “advancing” per articles going back into May, so that’s not a great example of something happening.

            This particular article wasn’t contributing anything new when written, and posting it now is just re-regurgitating the same stuff that’s already been out there for weeks. Their point is valid.