• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      But there are a few specific hardware configurations and specialized jobs that Linux doesn’t work for, therefore nobody should use it!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Why not be happy both OS options exist? Both have a place and a use and in various ways an ease of use

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          That’s the point. We want options for OSs to exist, instead of one company monopolizing the entire market.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Linux with 100% market share can’t monopolize the entire market because it doesn’t have a centralized distro

            You see similar to Google with Redhat/Canonical. If everyone was with them then it would be a problem

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Linux with 100% marketshare means nothing.

              GPL is designed to protect developer rights, not user rights.

              If google packaged your linux distro and sold it through the play store bundled with their own apps and sandboxed everything and called it chromeOS, your rights would not be any better protected.

              Security and privacy involves users making informed choices to protect themselves, full stop.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Any of thousands of people can say this but i don’t see it in the comments below so: I’ve been using a Linux Mint / Windows dual boot system for over 10 years and love it. I think a lot of people see Linux as highly technical, but versions like Mint and Ubuntu are more carefree than Windows nowadays.