Wow this post got popular. I got called into work and didnt see the replies, sorry ladies and gentlemen! Trying to catch up tonight.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 years ago

    I mean it sounds like just the one, American XL bully. Seems perfectly reasonable to me given how ridiculously powerful these dogs are makes them extremely dangerous when they’re being aggressive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      People are more dangerous than any dog. Can we ban them on looks too, please?

      Oh wait. The US already does this. It’s called “racism.”

      • Ataraxia
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        In the sense that humans are responsible for these natural abuses existing, sure. Humans can stop being dangerous in this sense by not breeding these unnatural predators.

      • PM_me_your_vagina_thanks
        link
        fedilink
        222 years ago

        Dogs have highly adaptive genetics, and have been selectively bred for millennia. Comparing dogs to humans shows how fucking ignorant you are.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 years ago

        I tell you what, if we specifically genetically engineer people to be aggressive and powerful and they start eating toddlers faces then I’m cool with banning them too.

        “Dog racism”, fuck off.

        • Ataraxia
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          It’s a bad faith argument people make to use people’s morality against them. Pitt owners tend to be conservative nazi types and they think they’re clever trying to use "woke"language