• spyd3r
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    We should be eliminating income tax, not making it easier for the government to take our money.

    • defunct_punk
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      Complete pipe dream. The government is gonna take their share whether you like it or not, the only thing this changes is that big tac corporations won’t take theirs, too

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      Meanwhile the IRS should do what other countries do and just use the data they already have and send you a tax bill. What we currently have for like 99% of the tax paying public is a system where you get to guess if you filled out the forms correctly and then the irs, using the data it already has for you, corrects your mistakes and sometimes penalizes you for getting it wrong. All this while allowing Intuit and others to extract even more rent from people.

      • spyd3r
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        To cut spending back to the point that the federal government can balance it’s budget without income tax revenue.

          • spyd3r
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Every federal level bureaucratic agency there is.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 years ago

              The National Weather Service, the National Park Service, the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the National Transportation Safety Board, etc? Yeah! What have any of those agencies ever done for us?!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        How about wealth taxes instead. You know, like what we’re already doing with property taxes?

        Income taxes disproportionately affect the poorest in society.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          Then the solution is to make the existing income tax more progressive than it already is, not just throw it away.

          • TrenchcoatFullOfBats
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            More progressive, close the loopholes, fund the IRS properly so they are actually able to prosecute tax cheats (usually wealthy), set a cap on tax money that can go to the military and outlaw any tax cuts that primarily benefit the top 3 tiers within 3 years of an election.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Wealth Tax is just income tax with different increments of tax bracketing. You sound like a dummy. Nobody said the current income tax structure needs to be retained. Also rich people will just spend thier money on things not considered wealth, which they can convert back to wealth as needed, if true wealth tax is ever proposed.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Wealth and income are related, but are not the same thing. Wealth is assets while Income is earnings. Wealth could come from saving/investing income, but it can also come from “unearned income” like the appreciation of assets.

            I personally don’t support Wealth Taxes because wherever they’ve been implements, they’ve had limited effects. I’ve yet to hear a good plan for how to execute a Wealth Tax and haven’t heard good answers for questions like, “Do we allow for depreciation of wealth?” and if so, “How do we avoid that turning into a tax loophole.”

            Either way, wealth and income aren’t the same thing.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              if i thought wealth and income were the same thing, I wouldn’t have listed taxation of income vs wealth as different things, which I did.

    • Maeve
      link
      fedilink
      172 years ago

      How do you propose we pay for roads, military, and everything else you use?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        You know there are lots of other taxes than just income tax?

        Roads and car infrastructure, at least in my area, is paid for entirely through through gas and car insurance taxes, occasionally property taxes if it’s in a municipality. But income tax doesn’t pay a penny for the roads.

        • Maeve
          link
          fedilink
          112 years ago

          Tf I want to pay tax on subsidized dino rot? Sales tax punished poor people, properly structured income tax does not.

        • defunct_punk
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Downvoted for telling the truth. The original comment is still wrong but “what about the roads” crowd never seems to know that roads are almost entirely funded with gas tax. That’s what the $3.67^9 is for

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Consumption taxes are regressive and affect the poor more than the rich.

          EDIT income taxes almost certainly pay for a significant portion if not a majority of the road work in your area.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Income tax is just a fine charged on the company for having employees. It’s not taken from you, it’s taken from them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        That’s not true. Income is taxed against the individual. Employers are required to withhold income taxes in many cases, but it’s not “a fine charged on the company.” It is a tax on the individual’s income, withheld from the individual.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          But the end result is the same. You don’t “make 50k, and lose 15k to taxes”, you just make 35k. That’s is. That’s what you make. If you want more, talk to your employer.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            But the end result is the same. You don’t “make 50k, and lose 15k to taxes”, you just make 35k. That’s is. That’s what you make. If you want more, talk to your employer.

            No, that’s exactly what happens. Have you ever filed a tax return? We’re not debating subjective interpretation here. You make a gross income that is then taxed by the government. The income tax that the government takes is taken from your gross income.

            Your employer is taxed on your income by “Payroll tax”, which is a tax against the employer and is not income tax:

            Payroll taxes include amounts paid by both the employee and the employer to cover any federal taxes due, while income taxes specifically refer to the amount owed by the employee to cover their individual federal income taxes owed.

            Source. I’m not trying to be pedantic – in your original post, you said “Income tax is just a fine charged on the company for having employees” which is objectively not true. Income tax != payroll tax.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              Yes, you’re 100% factually correct. However, it’s not useful to complain about an income tax because society benefits from those services. Fundamentally, if you’re unhappy with your take home, you need to complain about your salary. And to accept that, you need to make the mental switch to believing that your pre-tax income is not actually your income.

      • SaltySalamander
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        You can certainly tell you don’t work. Income tax is taken from both you and your employer. Your employer matches what you pay.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          That’s due to the structure of the tax bracketing. It’s not inherent to taxation. If the bracketing were closer to a “wealth tax” distribution, it would be more fair than a wealth tax.