• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    152 years ago

    Also, fun fact: drag queen isnt an ideology. Children simply are more engaged with wild and colorful aesthetics than they would be with you buncha fucking droll-ass, bible-thumping prudes

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Ooh bro, that’s a miss. You have to start asking yourself “if it doesn’t matter, then why does it matter so much?” 😉

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        No I dont. If it doesnt matter, what does it matter so much TO YOU?

        And who the fuck are you to be telling everyone else how to live their fucking lives?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          All that has to happen is someone has to say “yes, I understand that it is weird that gay dudes in dresses demand access to and influence over children, but I still choose to give them that access and influence.” Please, fuck up your stupid children however you would like. Send them to Boy Scouts to get molested or put them in organized sports to get hazed and abused. Just don’t lie about what happens.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            Wow, that is an EXTREMELY psychotic and paranoid delusional fantasy you’ve been cucked into believing. Not surprising since you do not have the capacity to differentiate between a serial killer and a drag queen, or the likelyhood of one being promoted instead of the other. NOBODY HAS DEMANDED ACCESS TO CHILDREN. The only people who make that claim are pedophiles, so you’re going on the list like all the other pedophiles caught projecting nonstop. READERS: NOTE THAT WE HAVE A POTENTIAL PEDOPHILE IN OUR MIDST, NAMED “PENIX”. Tracks, doesnt it?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 years ago

                Ah, ran out of arguments I see. The starting point is “let’s allow people to read to kids.” The next question is whether “people” here should include men In a dress. If you answer no, it’s on you to explain why it should not.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              You are not being objective here and your bias has poisoned every single point you’re trying to make. Know what? Don’t try again. Go yell into a garbage can instead.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                52 years ago

                Its more fun to watch you run around in circles screaming at the screen. Also, you dont know what objective means, because serial killers are objectively not comparable to men in a costume.