@[email protected] to Curated [email protected] • 2 years agoWhat’s in a name?i.imgur.comimagemessage-square144fedilinkarrow-up11.22K
arrow-up11.22KimageWhat’s in a name?i.imgur.com@[email protected] to Curated [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square144fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years ago But there is no good phylogenetic definition because all the animals we call “fish” The challenge was to come up with a group “which includes both trout and sharks but not humans”. It seems like “gills” satisfies that pretty well.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoAnimals with gills do not form a monophyletic group.
The challenge was to come up with a group “which includes both trout and sharks but not humans”. It seems like “gills” satisfies that pretty well.
Animals with gills do not form a monophyletic group.