I’ve heard it explained that “hey” used to be more of an urgent way to get someone’s attention, rather than a casual “hello” like it is now, so it sounded rude to some older folks.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    581 year ago

    I’m glad that the attitude that if you don’t speak “correctly,” then you are not worth engaging with is dying out.

    Well, on the grammar front, anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I think they are finding that they will be lonely if they want to continue to follow that path.

    • The Picard ManeuverOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      571 year ago

      I’m glad the “not worth engaging with” attitude is dying out, but I do still think it’s important to push for people to communicate accurately and effectively, which includes understanding and following grammatical rules when needed.

      Language and vocabulary are essential to how we think and collectively problem-solve.

      • Transporter Room 3
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        The point of language is to communicate information.

        If the information was successfully relayed, the language exchange was successful.

        If the person knows you MEAN “hello, I would like two of these items here, thank you good sir. hands cash and cashier says thank you You’re welcome. Have a pleasant day, sir” when you SAY “Sup, two please. Thanks man. No problem have a good one.” then you have successfully languaged.

        So when my wife with a plethora of issues involving word recall says some insane thing because she can’t remember the right words, as long as I understand what she means, her language did it’s job.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        341 year ago

        Yep, I get the “Language is constantly evolving” argument, but if I have to read your sentence three times just to parse it because you were too lazy to press a few keys, I’d consider that disrespectful to whomever is reading your comments

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        There’s got to be movement on both sides to a common understanding. If one side won’t budge, then fuck 'em.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      It should of died out long ago and on the side of academic linguistics did, but on the internet sadly not so much

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        There’s descriptive and there’s prescriptive linguistics. The first is the scientific endeavor of finding out and explaining how a language works. The second is the realm of anal politicians from the colonialist era who used language as an oppression tool to suppress local cultures and force the hegemonic culture upon indigenous people to make it easier to dominate, eradicate and subjugate them. Currently regarded as one of the defining elements of Genocides. For examples see, Spanish, French, English, Russian, German, Dutch, Portuguese, Mandarin … well you get the idea.