“We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.”

That’s gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I’ve heard in a while.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    382 years ago

    Punishing the lesser of two evils by rewarding the greater evil isn’t going to lead in the direction you want it to.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Yeah, I get what you’re saying. What I’m saying is that if the farther right candidate wins, the next nominee is going to move right because that’s where the voters are.

        And that’s ignoring the rest of the comments about if there will even be another election.

      • BraveSirZaphod
        link
        fedilink
        142 years ago

        It’s a non-trivial assumption that there would even be a genuine election after that.

      • mosiacmango
        link
        fedilink
        16
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The last 4 years of a GOP president saw 3 supreme court seats that will cause brutal ripples though our country for 20-30yrs at least.

        Thinking that “whatever happens will only last 4 yrs” is either wildly stupid or intentionally misleading.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        So they will help put someone in power that will remove fair elections? That makes no sense as a long term plan, imo it’s more likely they are trying to push democrats a certain way but are not truly entertaining the notion of voting for a fascist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Just it will, it it makes the lesser of two evils to turn to be actually good, instead of lesser evil.

      Ones power in democracy isn’t in given ones vote It is in withholding it. Your vote is your hostage and the political party is the hostage negotiator trying to get it from you.

      If you give away the hostage before the bargaining even begins, you have no leverage. You are nobody, non-entity. Your opinion and your interests don’t matter. Since you always release the hostage, before the negotiating starts.

      At some point in comparative lesser of two evils must come the moment of “in absolute measures the evil is too much, even the lesser evil”. Withold vote and the egotistical lesser evil, who doesn’t want to lose to the greater evil has to listen to your concerns and turn course.

      Until the first moment you withhold vote, they can happily slide in behind the greater evil just two microns behind them in the evil slide.