🙄

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    132 years ago

    And that one I REALLY don’t understand. They kept saying they wanted to be profitable, but then intentionally cut off a primary source of profit?? Oh to be a fly on the wall for THAT meeting…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      but then intentionally cut off a primary source of profit??

      It might just show that advertisement was the much bigger source for money.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Well, that would explain premium at least, but weren’t many of the awards purely vanity? Or were they worried that people wouldn’t buy them because it no longer gives the recipient premium? Either way I’ surprised that their first response was removing them entirely instead of raising prices, eliminating only premium to see if people still bought awards, or like, literally anything else