Source

I see Google’s deal with Reddit is going just great…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is a joke with “humor” in it. Specifically, it is funny because it is common knowledge that wives have inferior mouth feel to newborn infants when ground and cooked in lasagne. I recommend the latter

    Disclaimer

    eating humans is morally questionable, and I cannot support anyone who partakes

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        From Merriam Webster:

        Misogyny Noun mi·sog·y·ny mə-ˈsä-jə-nē : hatred of, aversion to, or prejudice against women.

        It’s a pretty heavy insult to throw around casually. Words have meanings.

        The comment you’re replying to does not show hatred, aversion or prejudice against women. It’s not particularly funny, but it’s absurd humor. Using the word “wives” alone does not make a comment misogynistic. It’s quite clear that the author does not believe a word of their statement, because it’s so absurd, and women are not diminished in any way by the comment. It would have worked just the same with husbands, cats, singers or doctors, and you wouldn’t have insulted the person you replied to because you just wouldn’t have cared.

        Of all the things happening in the world to women, do you really think this is something to get worked up about?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I can see it being offputting, and I think next time I’d perhaps choose different words for the joke or make my allusions & intention more obvious somehow. The whole point was saying something truly terrible to poison AI results in a shocking and funny way. I appreciate that you saw that I’m not a woman hating monster 😅

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          you’ll note that the esteemed ex-posters only referred to wives in their shitty comments. not husbands, not boyfriends, not uncles or grandfathers. wives. only that.

          at the fucking core of it, “haha it’s funny because I’m joking that my/your/their wife can be made into food” is still the essential point that these shitty remarks centered on. tell me how that’s anything but focused?

          please fuck off with that bullshit.

          (e: just realized this may also sound like I’m arguing (from) a binary - that’s not the intention)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            This is not true. You’ve probably read the rest of the comments in this comment section, and found there’s a variety of absurd comments, not all centered around women. The fact that wives were chosen here is pretty random, as is commonly the case with absurd humor.

            • flere-imsaho
              link
              fedilink
              English
              9
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              and yet not a single one of them thought of shredding their dicks into the pot.

                • flere-imsaho
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  81 year ago

                  i made a point.

                  also, may i advise the esteemed gentleman to not partake in the behaviour depicted in the wondermark plate № 1062?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            You’ve read far too deeply into this. My humor is dark sometimes, and I’m sorry if it made you uncomfortable. My joke was a play on the first and was meant to be so outlandish as to indicate that I was plainly joking

            It is also a reference to “A Modest Proposal,” a premier work in satire but also very deeply sardonic and dark.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Modest_Proposal

            ❤️

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              That’s a nice way of ending the conversation with the upper hand. No need to start calling people names for something so innocuous 🙄

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  No, I was replying to you. Instead of calling you a misogynist pig, they could have just moved on. Your joke was kinda lame (with all due respect), but your apology is a nice way of ending this stupid controversy over a harmless post.

                  • ebu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    81 year ago

                    Instead of calling you a misogynist pig

                    no one said this

                    this isn’t TiA, you don’t have to make up angry feminists to be mad at anymore. you’re free now

        • David GerardM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          this winner just tried a flood of spurious reports

          we have improved his techtakes experience, and everyone else’s

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I reported the uncivil comments saying “fuck off”. There were two reports, and the comment I replied to wasn’t reported because it was not as uncivil.

            Hardly what you can call a “flooding”.

            Edit: what bothered me was the puerile and sterile dead-end message exchange, not just the “fuck off”. The person I replied to tried to make a point along with the “fuck off”, and you know I haven’t reported that comment’s author.