• xep
    link
    fedilink
    88
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Premium phones make little sense, based on what I’ve seen everyone puts them in cases anyway. “Premium materials” are slippery and “premium thinness” results in insufficient battery capacity so accessories like phone rings get put on them, and people carry around external battery packs.

    Why not just make a grippy, practical phone that I can use as a tool, with removable batteries, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and expandable memory?

    • EarMaster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I don’t need the audio jack, but I guess it doesn’t hurt. There are phones that have all that, but unfortunately they are at most mid-range phones which isn’t what I’m looking for.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because that phone would last and you would only need a new one every 4-5 or however many years instead of 1-2 so capitalist companies won’t see that as having any value.

      I think companies know what people want and how to make a great phone like that, just none of them will or want to be the first.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      The only thing premium phones have going for them are really good cameras. I love midrange phones but the photos they produce are not as good as flagships.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Unfortunately, they have minimal support for US frequencies. The US market is dominated by disgustingly expensive flagships, and severely compromised midrange and budget offerings.