• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    522 years ago

    Because you are designed to seek out salt and sugar as a survival trait; then decided to mass produce it and put it into everything. Now your tastebuds have been ruined, even the standard apple/banana has been genetically modified to have more sugar

    • qyron
      link
      fedilink
      272 years ago

      Genetically modified? That’s a stretch.

      Like many other cultures, bananas and apples were selectively reproduced to obtain fruits with more to eat. Corn, carrots, every single kale and cabbage, potatoes, oranges and even strawberries can go into this basket.

      The wild banana has almost nothing to eat, being filled with large seeds and we can still find wild apples, by nature very tart but still edible. Every single cereal we plant and harvest today was originally nothing more than a wild grass.

      But to call the work of millenia and who knows how many generations of farmers genetic modifications is a bit over the top.

      GMOs are very recent introductions and normally for obtaining pest, drought or disease (more) resistant plants.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        GMOs are very recent introductions and normally for obtaining pest, drought or disease (more)

        Those bastards!!!

        resistant plants.

        Oh…ok…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        The wild banana has almost nothing to eat, being filled with large seeds and we can still find wild apples, by nature very tart but still edible. Every single cereal we plant and harvest today was originally nothing more than a wild grass.

        I cannot help thinking about the first proto-human that started munching on the tips of wild grass.

        • “Hey Unk, check out Krug over there, chewin on the grass. That shit’s messed up.”
        • “I dunno Greg. Looks pretty tasty to me.”
        • qyron
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Our ancestors were primarily leaf eaters, so moving to grass wouldn’t be that unusual. But let’s picture the first proto-human that decided to go for the carcass of another animal, either killed by a predator or by fire or lightning. That would have been an event.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            I’m pretty sure most primates are omnivores so they’d have been hunting as well just more in an opportunistic way

            • qyron
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              If we are to go back far enough, we are bound to find an ancestor mostly herbivore. On that level, going for the scenario I mentioned would have been some event.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        Selective breeding and grafting modified the genetics

        Bananas all being clones

        There’s no reason to separate the terms

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          A skyscraper and a toolshed are both buildings technically speaking. So in that sense you are correct, only technically correct.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            I would have said a skyscraper made of metal and a skyscraper made of cement are both skyscrapers for your analogy but sure

        • qyron
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Let’s analyse that.

          Selective breeding increases the frequency of a given set of genes, already present in a species, in order to better manifest specific, more advantageous - either nature or human chosen - traits.

          Random mutations can occur when biological reproduction happens but unless extreme and radical - which often prove fatal for the offspring - are not relevant for the species in the immediate.

          These principles are applicable to both plants and animals.

          Now grafting takes a part of one plant - usually a small branch - uses another plant to provide the root system - usually something that grows much faster than the graft - and this process multiplies asexually the plant from which the branch was oroginally cut. No genes are carried over between the two plants.

          This is valid to get a bunch of trees out of a single one in a very short time but it will not introduce new genes into the crop.

          Quince trees are often used as root stock to graft other trees, like pear and apple. If the seeds from those grafted trees were to be sprouted, planted and nurtured to maturity, apples or pears would grow but of completely new varieties. The quince trees used to provide the root for grafting would provide zero genes to the new varieties.

          Can you expand on why you consider grafting as a tool for genetic manipulation?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            it will not introduce new genes into the crop.

            Under normal circumstances new genes would be, but the new plant isn’t considered a new species (like tigons not being a species)

            • qyron
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              normal circumstances

              As in a quince tree cross polinate a pear tree or an apple tree?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        352 years ago

        We absolutely genetically modified pretty much all of our food. We just did it by selective breeding.

        The only difference with modern GMO is we’ve learned to do it directly much faster. We don’t need a random mutation to add a trait anymore.

        • qyron
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Can we get a geneticist here?

          Last time I was taught about biology, selective breeding was a process through which, over a long period of time, individuals with favorable traits were multiplied in order to increase the prevalence of such traits.

          The genes were already introduced, hence, no modification. Already existing characteristics were allowed to further express and refine.

          Genetic modification, to my understanding, implies introducing genetic information into the genome of an organism to produce another with traits previously completely absent in the species.

          Selection vs manipulation.

          I’ll concede there are a few cases where the lines blurr, like the golden rice, where a gene that codified the production of vitamin A in the grain was/is already inactive or so receassive, in order to have it express again would require gene manipulation but I think a selective production program was put forward in an attempt to bring out that gene again.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              42 years ago

              I think you two have different images in your minds. You say “genetically modify” as in “modify the food through choosing which genes are to prevail”, while the other means “modify genes directly to affect the food”, and in that sense selective breeding isn’t GMO because no genes have been modified, but rather encouraged. You modify the genetic structure of future generations through natural means, not the organism directly.

              Don’t know what scientists say, I just see the other comment downvoted when they have a fair point.

            • qyron
              link
              fedilink
              92 years ago

              I can’t agree with that.

              The basic notion of genetically modifying an organism implies changes enacted at the genetic level, through artificial means, not biological.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      iirc the modern banana is actually a less flavorful variety than centuries past, but not for selective breeding reasons. The more popular variety, the Gros Michel, was susceptible to a certain fungus that wiped it out by the 60s. Those apparently tasted closer to the artificial banana flavoring that is still used today and in fact are what that flavoring was based on (albeit probably quite a bit more sugary and concentrated since it’s still a candy flavoring).

      And then you have other produce like apples and tomatoes being bred for size and yield, since that will both net more profit and feed more people. This often necessarily means that the produce will lose flavor in the process, as well as nutritional value by weight since the size/yield increase is mostly just the crop taking up more water. (I think the genetic modification you mentioned is in some part meant to correct that inverse relationship between yield and nutritional density, but I’d have to read up more on the subject.)

      So I think you can just as much argue that it’s not our tastebuds being ruined so much as produce itself being considerably less appealing to them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        You can buy Gros Michel bananas still you just have to put in some effort. If you are in the USA and have the cash the Miami Fruit Co ships them when they grow them. I haven’t checked but I believe they are in banana season.

        • Dark Arc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Whoa, looks like a really cool company in general! Thanks for the tip!

      • SeaJ
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        The gros Michel is also not a natural banana. Those were also all clones of each other. Natural bananas have big ass seeds throughout them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    I’ve had properly sauteed and spiced asparagus and it still tastes awful to me. I’m just very sensitive to the bitter compounds in it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Cut off the heads off the asparagus. That’s where it’s most bitter and it messes with the rest of the dish. My wife does this as well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I have used that trick when served asparagus, it definitely helps. But I would still prefer green beans, or broccoli instead.

        • kux
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          don’t cook it, just slice the stalks very finely. delicious. i like the heads mashed in with mashed potato but that’s more effort than it’s worth really. any way you eat it, your piss will stink to high heaven

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    252 years ago

    I just spent Thanksgiving with my family, and was reminded how much my parents love boiling things. Fucking disgusting, no spices either? Fuck bland potatoes. It takes almost no effort to just toss a bunch of fucking spices on them and then put them in the oven.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Isnt thanksgiving a month from now? Are you like from the future? Why did you suddenly come back? Is the whole world doomed and you came back to warn us of something terrible?!?!?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      My dad does this, just boils vegetables and potatoes so long that they’re reduced to their component quarks and then serves them in a bowl with nothing on them. For bonus points, he makes sure they’ve cooled off to room temperature before we eat. I want to blame the Great Depression for this style of “cuisine”, but he was born after that shit.

    • Ignisnex
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      No excuse for bland potatoes. Even boiled, they can taste good. Low effort, throw some dill on those bastards. It’s that easy. My mom is diabetic, and down a kidney, so salt and sugar are not really things in the food she makes, but it always tastes good.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Cook nearly any veggie in shallots, cream, whisked in egg, top with Parmesan, broil until brown.

    Veggie gratin that isn’t the most healthy but is better than nothing, and brilliant served as a side to steak. I recommend mushrooms, spinach or zucchini.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Was gonna say, that sounds pretty high in fat. Definitely better than a lot of the alternatives, but I’d only call it just this side of not healthy.

      The real problem is that healthy food really is only good if it’s fresh, and so it’s a lot more inaccessible than shitty, processed either frozen or fast food.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Okay, I’ll eat both…just as soon as apple and/or amazon sews your lips to my anus. Maybe I’ll stack some fiberone bars on top of it so that I fart for a few hours before the shit comes out.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Nope. You can’t fix bitter vegetables. Hell, you can barely smother them enough to hide the taste. I’d rather die “young” from eating delicious trash.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      As someone who just started liking brussel sprouts because I learned how to cook them right, you’re wrong.

  • JoYo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    put some salt on the veggies an hour before eating.

    salad literally means brined vegetables.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    752 years ago

    The real reason is that unhealthy food contains ingredients that were rarer for our ancestors to obtain. Dense caloric food meant surviving a winter, but our winter never comes.

    • MuchPineapples
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The bible actually says there are other gods beside the main one; he’s the king of kings, god of gods. But maybe there’s an emperor of emperors, God of gods of gods? It’s gods all the way up.

  • JoYo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    nutritionist hate this one trick.

  • Troy
    link
    fedilink
    152 years ago

    All these air fryer, broiler, sautéing, and other methods…

    Y’all forgot about microwaves. Microwaves and veggies are amazing. Broccoli, carrots, etc. Microwave until a fork still has a little resistance. Add a spot of sour cream or honey and dill… Or something. Tada. So fast. So yummy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      332 years ago

      Okay I microwave veggies a lot because it’s convenient but we cannot pretend that the fart cloud created by microwaved broccoli is in anyway close to the delicious crispyness of stir fried or baked broccoli

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Sounds good. My parents make microwave potatoes often, and I have to admit they’re good. My microwave broke a couple years ago and I haven’t missed it, though.