On version 0.19 you can block instances so that you don’t see any posts from that instance, instead of having to block communities one by one, you still see comments from users of that instance in other posts so it isn’t completely blocking the instance.

  • LegionEris [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    None. I wish I could see more content. Not enough is made of the fact that you only see content your instance is already connected to. Part of my frustration with the platform is that I joined a neutral instance to have as much content as possible, but relatively little of it is shuffled to me in the all feed. I like discovering new things online. I hate the catch 22 of federation content access, where being on a large enough instance to be certain you’re well connected means being on an instance that has blocked a lot of content to appease its larger userbase.

    • kratoz29
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Bro, I swear most Lemmy users don’t know they can subscribe to communities… Like WTF why hurt yourself blocking half the Fediverse when browsing Everything instead of doing less of a work just subscribing to shit you actually like…

      When I was on Reddit I just browsed my own communities with the best sort and called it a day… For 10 years-ish lol.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I treat this place as reverse reddit. You can’t browse by subscribed because then you see 4 posts. But it’s hard to find the communities I might like. So I browse by all and block things I don’t want to see like foreign language, tentacle porn and Linux communities. That way I still see new communities I might like and get an endless scroll.

  • Urist
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    None right now.

    I block communities, not groups of users. I usually don’t have a problem with the actual users on an instance, I mostly just want to avoid porn (I don’t use lemmy for that, nothing wrong with it, though)

    The only instance I would block is Threads but my instance admin is doing that already.

  • Stamets
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    Heavily considering blocking sh.itjust.works to be honest. That instance now has admins that care but for a very long time they didn’t. Led to a lot of bad actors making accounts on that instance because they knew they could get away with more. Most trolls I’ve seen lately are from that instance and its getting a little exhausting.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Really? I haven’t seen that and I’m on a lot. Maybe it’s on communities I don’t frequent? Which are you taking about?

      • Stamets
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not a specific community. I’ve been here since August and have nearly 1.5k posts across a wide variety of communities and wide variety of instances. In that time I’ve seen more and more bad faith comments from people with the SJW instance tag. It’s not universal but it is noticable. Due to my frequent posting, I also have gotten to know admins from multiple instances and all of them have expressed the same frustration. To its credit, SJW did get new admins within the past month or so that are working hard to fix shit and don’t take it lightly.

        Just an example of what can happen when mods and admins let things slide for a while.

    • Ethalia
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Past two days I’ve seen pure CP posted without NSFW tags on or anything from that place. I’m also considering blocking it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      The troll thing was going on a few weeks ago but I haven’t seen any activity like that recently. I sometimes use that instance directly as well as a kbin and a couple others. I browse New generally and haven’t seen any illicit content either.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t have plans to block any. I’ve already blocked the active communities in some of the instances I might consider blocking in whole to the point I never see posts from those instances anyway as well as any individual problem user I run across. I don’t really see a reason to block an entire server because even the worst places have some good people, just like all the best places still have some shitty people. Unless the instance itself was dedicated to CP or something.

      • Atemu
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It blocks their replies from reaching your inbox but I really wish it blocked their comments generally too or at least put them behind a content warning/hides it.

  • Fake4000
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    I 90 percent of the time browse my list of communities.

    The other ten percent, I explore the All feed. It’s filled with so many communities that do not interest me.

    I don’t think I will be blocking any instances for now as it helps in exploring new groups.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Same boat as you - most of my time is spent on subscribed, not /all

      No need for me to block anything at the moment tbh…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ani.social

    yiffi or whatever its called

    Non english instances

    The fan-something one that seems to be solely football/sports

    alien.top thats just bots reposting reddit content

    • GONADS125
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m going to be jumping ship should .world federate with Threads. I’ll find a different instance.

      I know we will be able block Threads individually, but I don’t agree with federating with them on ethical principles.

      I feel like it’s a failure to insulate the users from extremism and a company that deserves absolutely no trust or endorsement.

      Edit: Blocking Threads on an individual basis does not prevent Threads users’ comments from being displayed on federated instances. Even if users Block Threads, they will still be exposed to the rampant hate, harassment, and extremism on the platform.

        • GONADS125
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Thanks for sharing. I’ll be voicing my opposition in hopes that it contributes to changing that status.

          • asudoxM
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            According to a post by one of the LW admins in mastodon, they won’t think about defederating unless it causes them “trouble”

            • GONADS125
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Well let’s hope massive outrage by the majority of their userbase falls into the category of “trouble” then.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Except i genuinely don’t see their being massive outrage, as the user can block the instance so why would they need to defederate?

                • GONADS125
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Blocking the instance does not stop Threads comments from being displayed on any federated instance.

                  Even if a user blocks Threads, they will still be exposed to misinformation and hateful, extremist comments/users.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Ruud is generally pro-Threads federation. We have a lot of time to change his mind though. I think he knows his stance is outnumbered something like 5 to 1.

        • GONADS125
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I agree. The .world admins have been very down to Earth and reasonable thus far. I’m hoping they see reason here and do not make a decision in opposition to the majority of their userbase, which also threatens the safety of their users.

      • sab
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Not that you’ll be able to see content posted to Threads from Lemmy anyway - you cannot post threads (in the Fediverse sense) from Threads (the platform), and microblog posts are generally not visible from Lemmy. So it might make sense as a matter of principle, but it’s not going to change anything for you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I know it invites downvotes, but I really don’t get this.

      Isn’t the entire point of federation to remove closed spaces? By blocking Threads, it basically means that the sole interaction many people will have with the fediverse is that it’s a closed ecosystem that deems itself too important to converse with you.

      Even if you, like most, hate Meta, what have their users done wrong other than try to interact with your communities? If your fear is that Meta will control the fediverse, then you’ve built a closed ecosystem that’s essentially no different to Reddit. If your fear is that their community won’t like the same things you like, again, it’s a closed ecosystem.

      The best thing the fediverse could do is to embrace threads. Make this place the best place on the internet, and make them want to actually join in. If they break rules, by all means, ban them, but to dismiss so many people is as closed as it gets.

      • Lucia [she/her]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Isn’t the entire point of federation to remove closed spaces?

        Not necessary. Your instance still can just not federate with anyone.

        By blocking Threads, it basically means that the sole interaction many people will have with the fediverse is that it’s a closed ecosystem

        Yes, and by not blocking Threads we let it to become a de-facto standard way to consume content on the Fediverse. If users want to avoid closed ecosystems, they can just create an acc on one of many mastodon or lemmy instances.

        If your fear is that Meta will control the fediverse, then you’ve built a closed ecosystem that’s essentially no different to Reddit.

        Blocking a single bad actor = being fully centralised. Again, create an account on the instances that don’t feed on your data and mental wellbeing.

      • Mwalimu
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        At the most basic, Facebook (they changed to Meta as a PR thingy, mostly) thrives on being a closed broker extracting from the open world. It is not that I predict they will break things here, it is that they have consistently demonstrated that is their only way of making profits. It all starts nice and smooth. Until it isn’t.