• BodyBySisyphus [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 year ago

    Never thought I’d say the sentence “Well there’s a Sankey chart I’ll never be able to unsee,” but here I am saying it because this is hell and and of course we have libertarian sexworker data scientists and really sad Johns doing really sad exit interviews.

  • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 year ago

    17 came in Aella

    20 either came in a fluffer or didn’t cum at all

    another 19 signed up, interviewed, got tickets, and did not show or did not do the whole purpose of the event

    This girl got ratio’d by a fluffer

    • CloutAtlas [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 year ago

      I glanced through the article she posted. She had 5 fluffers and additional people holding her down (she has a non consensual kink). I think overall the ratio of participants in the orgy and “staff” at the orgy were 1:1.

        • CloutAtlas [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          It would be such an offbeat thing to do, since staff were actually paid.

          “Oh yeah I was paid $50/hr to observe an orgy and note orgasms without participating or interfering in any way” would be a great conversation starter

          • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            “I keep track of all sorts of things on data sheets. Restaurant menu items, agricultural production, housing markets, calls from stolen phones. Once I even kept track of outcomes at an orgy!”

  • gaycomputeruser [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    I started reading about her and she’s does porn but only has sex ~60 times a year? (In 2022). Idk if I’m weird but that seems really low? Like, if you’re that hot and it’s your job wouldn’t you fuck more?

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Begging my fellow men to have some standards Jesus Christ.

      1600 people wanted to have sex with someone who hasn’t showed in a month and averages one shower every 11 days? Fucking hell.

      • KhanCipher [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        “A shower once every 11 days is rookie numbers. Besides, no need to shower when you only go to a workplace that has a smell you’ve been desensitized to.” - Me, who works in a factory anywhere from 5-7 days a week from week to week.

        No, don’t ask me what my longest stretch without a shower is, you don’t want to know.

        • CindyTheSkull [she/her, comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          I know this is not at all a popular opinion, and I’m reluctant to say it even here on hexbear. But daily showering really is overrated. It can also be bad for your skin microbiome, especially if you use soap with antibacterial properties.

          Also hair that goes unwashed for good lengths of time will always be healthier hair than frequently-washed hair, even if it’s with the most expensive bourgsie ass shit shampoo at the salon. Just as an example, you know all those shampoo ads for dealing with split ends? Yeah, just don’t use the shampoo/conditioner at all, letting your natural hair oils build up, conditioning your hair and your “split ends” will be gone or at least markedly better than they would be with any overpriced garbage hair product that promises to cure them.

          • EelBolshevikism [none/use name]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            There is an in between showering daily and showering once a week, and even an in between showering daily with soap or shampoo and showering daily with soap or shampoo on and off.

          • disco [any]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Yeah she posts them. Obviously her “hotness” is a matter of personal taste, but it’s not surprise that a lot of men were eager to bust in a conventionally attractive woman.

      • CloutAtlas [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        It’s misleading, she swims regularly.

        I tend to wash off the chlorine after swimming, I guess she just let’s it absorb through her skin?

    • WafflesTasteGood [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      391 year ago

      Holy shit. I can’t figure out which would be worse; her not showering days before the gangbang or days after it.

  • Rom [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    481 year ago

    Shinigami eyes flags the account red. Who even is this person

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      One of those rich, fake job having pseudo intellectual who sit around pondering about life inside their mansion/luxury condo

    • WashedAnus [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      601 year ago

      reddit-logo-famous sex worker, took some goofy gnome pics like a decade ago, posted about doing acid, is part of the Effective Altruist cult

      • Rom [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Effective Altruism

        It’s like they correctly realized capitalism is a death cult and propagating global suffering, but instead of seeing if anyone else has ever worked out alternatives before them (marx) they came up with the brilliant idea to…pick the right careers and make donations? Without any actual material analysis of why things around the world are the way they are. Also apparently they have an algorithm that they say can predict world events or something.

        What an amazing prediction, no one else could have possibly seen that one coming, I’m sure.

        Apparently a bunch of techbros like Sam Bankman-Fried were heavily involved so that’s how you know it’s a joke ideology.

        • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, there’s the seed of a sensible idea in there, which is just “if you’re going to try to improve the world, you should think carefully about where and how to spend your limited resources to have the most impact.” That’s fine–good, even–but these ghouls have used that idea and their own ideological preconceptions to bootstrap themselves into some absolutely insane positions.

          A big part of the problem is that they extend their utility calculations indefinitely into the future with no temporal discounting whatsoever. That leads to a hyperfixation on “existential risks” and trying to optimize for lives 100,000 years in the future at the expense of lives today. Their “leading philosophers” say unhinged things about this: one of them claims that delaying the technological singularity is “costing” us something like 250 billion lives per second, since in the future when we’re an intergalactic civilization with 500 trillion people, that’s how many people will die every second before we have post-Star Trek levels of technology. Somehow this is taken by actual thinking human beings to be a compelling argument instead of a reductio ad absurdum of the position.

          The lack of any temporal discounting means that they see things that actually matter–like climate change, a lack of healthcare, or the ravages of global capitalism–as fundamentally unimportant. After all, if you can save 30 trillion lives in the year 45,000, who cares if a few billion die in the year 2060? The eventual impact of this is that most of them have talked themselves into thinking that AI “alignment” is the place they should all be focusing all their resources, since Robot God will either save us all from death forever or usher in human extinction, and thus its future utility numbers are either infinitely positive or infinitely negative. Therefore, they all insist that anyone not giving all their money and time to science fiction AI grifts like MIRI is fundamentally irrational and that trying to help actual people who are actually suffering right now is dumb, short sighted, and based in emotion (pejorative) instead of reason.

          They’re fucking infuriating grifters.

        • disco [any]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          201 year ago

          There is a certain logic to the original ideas of effective altruism. If you want to make positive change in the world, you will be more able to do so if you are a powerful person.

          The problem is you can essentially use it as a justification for endlessly pursuing your own personal power. After all the more powerful you become, the more good you can do! In fact it makes it easy to justify committing immoral acts in the pursuit of power-- think of it from a utilitarian point of view! I am going to do so much good once I’m rich, that it will far out weight the harm I’m doing now. In other words, an okay idea that is used and abused by the greedy and power hungry to convince themselves they aren’t bad people.

          • yeah like some charities are more effective than others, and if you’re already an engles maybe it’s some kind of better to find some billable hours and pay people to “volunteer” at the soup kitchen rather than do it directly yourself but those guys all went fucking nuts about pascal’s wager instead.

        • SSJ2Marx [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          pick the right careers and make donations

          On first blush, there’s a certain amount of logic to this, but then the EA people all “realized that AI is the most dangerous thing ever” and started giving all of their money to each other’s AI startups, so whatever it started as it ended up being a techbro grift.

          • fox [comrade/them]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            161 year ago

            It’s just utilitarianism with the serial number filed off and happiness demons being real life demons