• @Aermis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago

    Ok can it be translated to meat on the table with costs and impact being less than actual pig slaughtering? I wouldn’t even mind the taste being a little different

  • southsamurai
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    I’m not exactly what you would call concerned about meat as a food source. I’m fine with it. But anything that can break the need for industrial farming is a damn good thing imo.

    I’m eager for a good product to come to market so I can at least try it. So far, there hasn’t been one that’s available that’s priced well enough to be a viable choice, nor that matches expectations of taste. Textures have gotten good though.

    But I think a sausage format is a great place for cultured meats to break into because there’s a wide range of ingredients with different flavors already. We’re used to sausages being fairly varied in taste and texture, so adding a new type is less of a “new food” barrier. Tbh though, it’s gotta be better than veggie sausages, those are pretty meh at best.

    • Kata1yst
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Generally stem cell cultures these days are sourced once then replicated forever.

      • emmanuel_car
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        That’s pretty incredible, with no noticeable degradation between replications? I know very little about stem cell cultures.

        • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          There’d have to be some degradation over time. Unless they’re repairing the DNA using computerized backups or something.

          • Kata1yst
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            The stem cells themselves are self-repairing and self replicating. Quoting Wikipedia:

            Due to the self-renewal capacity of stem cells, a stem cell line can be cultured in vitro indefinitely.

            Currently all embryonic stem cell research and therapies in the US are conducted using only 486 cultures.

    • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Presumably they culture more, but obviously the first cells would have had to. Some of these companies have been very particular about sourcing their starting cells non-lethally from sanctuary animals or whatever, because why not.

  • @blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    ah would you look at that, no mention of quantity.

    It’s 60 times faster, there should be the volume of an entire pig’s worth in like 2 weeks.

    • RBG
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      There is a magical process that is called “upscaling”. More relevant is the cost of things, which likely will be higher here.

      • @blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        “60 times faster” is a scalability claim. A pig can make a pig’s worth of meat in about 6 months. That is a rate, that is a quantity over a time. In fact actually doing the math, increasing that rate by 60 times mean the same quantity over 3 days!

        Scalability has been the hurdle for all lab grown meat projects. This is claiming to have it beaten, Im asking for the proof. Show me the scale, show me the results, if they stopped at a thin film of meat cells covering a petri dish, they havent scaled up anything yet.

  • @Brekky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 year ago

    This sounds like good news but what I don’t want is one big corporation replacing hundreds/thousands of worldwide farmers and having total control over the cost of selling this to consumers.

      • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        Those farms receive immense subsidies as well. No, it’s not efficient, it’s just what the US economic system produces.

    • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Yes we definitely don’t want one corp owning this entire type of tech.

      I think some kind of cultured meat is “obvious” at this point in history.

      I don’t think this company would be able to maintain its monopoly as other companies develop their own processes. Maybe some vegans will open source the basics or something.

      I doubt the legal system would allow one company to control this market, and tech being the barrier won’t do it either, so I don’t predict a monopoly for long on this kind of thing.

      • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        I doubt the legal system would allow one company to control this market

        Yeah, it will be like two-three, owned by the same shareholders on the stock market.

        • @mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          And since all shares are actually owned by the DTCC, they are the actual masters manipulating the stock as needed to enrich themselves. We’ll get cultured meat at their grace when it’s profitable for them.

        • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Or as many choose to enter the market, unless you think there will be some artificial constraint placed on entry?

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      We do have a number of excellent meat alternatives now, which use relatively simple processing steps and legumes, wheat etc. as base material.

      As such, I imagine, they will remain cheaper than lab-grown meat and if we can get past people’s reservations with them, I feel like they would offer a much more direct path for farmers to get paid, as well as the opportunity for various smaller companies to compete in doing that processing.

        • @Zerthax@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 year ago

          Regardless, we really shouldn’t be preventing progress for the sake of protecting jobs. Especially when the status quo is so wantonly destructive. And even as this would replace some jobs, it would create new ones.

          All that said, I’m very skeptical of this tech.

        • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The industrialized meat industry in Europe has very little to do with farming. An industrial stable with tens of thousands of pigs who never see daylight or breath fresh air is a factory, where bought animal feed is input, and manure and pigs are output.

          • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            The industrialized meat industry in Europe has very little to do with farming. An industrial stanle with thens of thousands of pigs who never see daylight or breath fresh air is a factory, where bought animal feed is input, and manure and pigs are output.

            sounds like the US system, without the child labor.

        • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          181 year ago

          The fields used to feed livestock would be used to grow stuff to feed humans

          The buildings… Should we really stop progress to save some buildings used to raise animals in order to kill them?

          There’s a labor crisis in the farming industry already (and in general really) so it’s not as if they had no option in front of them

          • @bluewing@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            You do realize that not all farmland is suitable for growing onions or melons. A pretty good chunk of it is pretty much suitable for grass only. Where I live, half of all the farmland is growing grasses for grazing and hay, (no, its not alfalfa). What are those farmers supposed to switch to make a living? The rest is used for wheat, rye, and barley and some green chop corn silage. And yields can be quite limited depending on the year.

            Unless you are fine with massively more use of fertilizers and pumping ground water to irrigate those food crops on marginal land. And even then the growing season overrides all.

            • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              Then you stop using that land to grow feed and let nature do its thing and the people working that land can just go work somewhere where there’s demand.

              Should we have stopped telecommunication progress to keep the switchboard operators working?

              • @bluewing@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                “the people working that land can just go work somewhere where there’s demand.”

                So easy to say when it’s not your job isn’t it.

                Now, I don’t know what you do to make a living, but with AI, your job as a programmer should just go away and you should find a different job where there is demand - maybe you could be a servant or stock shelves. It’s so easy to do so, just go somewhere else.

  • @revisable677@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    371 year ago

    I’ve been waiting for that for so long. Just hope governments and people give it a fair chance instead of jumping rashly negative conclusions just because it is lab grown. So is beer, and cheese, and most other things we consume.

    • @tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Italy’s politicians in a fantastically backward and utterly brain farted move has made “synthetic meat” outlaw, for study, production, sale and consume, like already some months ago, just to please the local (read: national) farmers lobby. Or at least they adverised as they did… forgive me I kinda lost hope and interst as well.

      Gotta love the totally-not-neofascist Meloni government :(

    • Derpgon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      I mean, with modern sausages, it’s mostly trash or overpriced. They taste like they have 5% meat, 95% sawdust.

  • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    601 year ago

    I’m skeptical. It’s been really picking hard to get those things to grow in a vat. This would be a huge breakthrough, and popsci has a way of leaving out critical, fatal details.

    • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      Such as “a claim proven by the hundred pounds of pseudo pork they shipped us overnight”?

      I didn’t read the article. I assume this journalist made zero primary observations?

      • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean, even shipping it wouldn’t say anything about what it’s production cost is. Only that they paid it.

        It literally quotes the company spokesperson as the main source on all this, and then comments on the brand having done a taste-test in Singapore.

  • @gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    Still won’t stop the “alpha male” types from hating it because they base their entire personality around doing what they think wi make other people mad.

  • @Auzy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Rednecks on Facebook are already getting butthurt about this like this and asking lab grown meat to be banned

    They’re going on about stuff like cancer or whatever