I recently saw ‘Don’t Look Now’ (1973). Good picture, a little slow perhaps by today’s standards but worthy of any movie enjoyer’s time! So this movie was shot in Venice. Venice itself being an already beautiful spot to film even today. The way we get to look in a time capsule of Venice in the 70s makes the movie that much better!

People in the 70s could not in fact appreciate it the same way we do now. Concurrently we also can’t do it for today’s movies. Some movies can only be truly appreciated over time is what I believe. This matter can be expressed in both the movie’s message or, as I did, its cinematography. Hence my question now to you.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    611 year ago

    I saw Alien 1 just a couple of weeks ago for the first time and I was amazed how good it still looked. The design of the spaceship and the alien itself still looked amazing in 4k on an OLED TV. And also the story still seemed like a fresh idea. Of course there are moments with stupid acting people, but all in all the decisions made felt plausible and logical, not the normal stupid horror movie group. And also the story twist came (for me) as a real surprise and not like a thing you knew after the first 5min. (And I’m also surprised that after all these years it’s still a surprise, cause everybody knows the alien but not the story of the first movie?)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Film is actually capable of holding way more detail than 4k. This is the crux of complaints when cinema projectors started to change from film to digital. I love it when old films get remastered in ultra high definition. It makes you realize that what the original audiences actually saw was much more high quality than what we associate with old films, like grain, burn spots, blur and stretching distortion, etc.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Yes, I think it was the 40th Anniversary release. Aliens is also supposed to be getting a 4K release soon.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I don’t want to give anything away for people, so I’ll just say that I never really appreciated the climax/ending part. It was pretty good up until that. I actually couldn’t help but start laughing the first time I saw it, which I doubt was the intended reaction. Basically the movie turns into schlock.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        This movie needed an hour or so of extra plot to make a better ending. It’s like they ran out of film and had to wrap up faster than anticipated. It’s still an amazing and captivating film.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    The Sixth Sense is a fantastic movie. None of the stuff Shamalan came up with after are really worth it, but this first movie is wonderful.

    • Rhynoplaz
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      I still don’t know how to use the three seashells. 😞

      • Call me Lenny/Leni
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Although it was most likely for humor, if I had to guess how it would work in their world, it’s probably akin to silverware, where each shell is used for a different poop texture.

        • Rhynoplaz
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Excuse me, could you pass a #2 seashell under the stall?

          (Nightmarish bowel sounds)

          Uhh, better make it a #3.

  • chbarts
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    @FatTony

    Citizen Kane is still a wonderful film with well-drawn characters, great cinematography, and a relevant message: If you have a hole in your psyche, wealth alone won’t fill it.

  • defunct_punk
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m going to tweak the OP a little bit to drop my movie unpopular opinion that I haven’t gotten to share here and say:

    Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is a damn fine, and more importantly, fun, addition the the franchise that deserves maybe a tenth of the hate it gets online. It’s pulpy, it’s cheesy, the writing swings between passable and unbelievable, and the plot is all of the place, both in tone and in narrative, but you know what: SO ARE ALL THE INDIANA JONES MOVIES!

    I honestly think that if that vine swinging scene never left the editing bay that movie would be looked back on a lot better.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      I envy your opinion and sadly cannot share it. It’s ok, I’ll just love the first three and take it as it comes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Yeah, no.

      I’ll defend the fifth one, even if the opening feels like you’re watching somebody play a Naughty Dog Indiana Jones game, but not the fourth.

      The fucking CGI gopher alone is enough, let alone the swinging with the monkeys bit or the fridge nuke. And even if you take all that out, it’s just not very good.

      1 > 3 > 2 > 5 >>> 4

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Contrary to popular opinion, the infamous fridge scene is good. The second half of the movie is forgettable.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    Willow. It’s beautiful, fun, scary. It’s full of flawed people being good to each other.

    It’s really quotable and has a handful of interesting twists.

    Willow has a few great performances. Val Kilmer knocks it out of the park, and Billy Barty is wonderful as the “High Aldwin”.

  • TheHarpyEagle
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    Whatever Happened to Baby Jane (1962). Timeless in is commentary on both child actors and being a damn good movie. Everything about the makeup makes the absolute most of the restricted grayscale palette. Definitely recommend it if you’re looking for a good thriller somewhat akin to Misery.

    • A Phlaming Phoenix
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think of both Baby Jane and Misery as horror movies (although I admit I hadn’t realized how similar they are until your comment). It’s almost a 60s version of torture porn. The ending is utter delusional madness. I agree, though, that it’s a great movie in every way.

      I’m sending a letter to Daddy!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    241 year ago

    The original Blade Runner(1982)

    That sparse and bleak mood will never age. Poses excellent dilemas and moral questions about cyborgs too.

    Also Citizen Kane. I watched it a couple of years ago because of it’s position in film history. Yes, it is that good of a masterpiece.

    • Rhynoplaz
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I feel like Citizen Kane is only good with a little bit of prep. Most people are watching movies for an entertaining story, and it doesn’t have that by today’s standards.

      I took a film history class in college and we spent a week learning about the framing, lighting and symbolism used throughout the movie BEFORE we watched it, and I had never appreciated the movie until then.

      • Discoslugs
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Dang. I had to watch this scene again. Definitely not consentual. Shes like running out the door before he steps in front of her.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    I recently watched Scarface for the first time, and if I didn’t know it was a movie made in the 80s, I wouldn’t have guessed… IMO it still looks quite good even in today’s standards.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Star Wars. The original one. It came out when there were no computer generated effects, and the effects still look incredible, even today.