• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    951 year ago

    funny that the Russkis mention Afghanistan 😅

    And as always, as long as the cunts in Russia are complaining and riding their propaganda train at full speed, we are doing something right.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      261 year ago

      These brainiacs had concerts singing Gruppa Krovi from Kino to recruits early in the war. A literal Afghanistan-era Soviet anti-war anthem. They have no sense of irony.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 year ago

    Ukraine wants the help. Afghanistan didn’t. Also, the Soviet Union did a similar thing in Afghanistan.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Afghani’s did want the help. They just didn’t want someone else telling them what they should do … again.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, remember when we told them NOT to make apostasy from Islam illegal?

        Oh, wait, we didn’t even bother doing that much.

        The War in Afghanistan didn’t fail because we were Big Bad Westerners Imposing Our Way Of Life, it failed because neither the Coalition nor the post-Ahmad Shah Massoud anti-Taliban forces had anything resembling a united direction they could agree on leading the country in. Post-2003 the Coalition plan was “Don’t fail” (Don’t fail at what? Now you’re asking questions that should have been fucking asked); the post-Ahmad Shah Massoud anti-Taliban forces’ plan was “Every warlord for himself”.

        Turns out absolute shitheads (the Taliban) with a definite plan can overcome a squabbling mass of decent people (everyday Afghanis), opportunists (contractors et co), and shitheads (hi brutal but pro-national government warlords) who are all at odds with each other.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        331 year ago

        I always know someone doesn’t know anything about Afghanistan and its people when they refer to them as Afghani’s.

        An Afghan is a person. Afghani is a currency. Anyone who calls them Afghani doesn’t even know the right term to call the people. It is a giveaway to how little you know about them when you don’t even know what to call them.

        Meanwhile all the Chineses and Viet Congs are turning in their graves right next to the Afgani.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Russian officials publicly assure the world that their invasion will only last 1 week due to their overwhelming military superiority.

    109 weeks later without a victory, losing twice as many soldiers and equipment, Russian officials swear that the US, not an active combatant, is going to be so embarrassed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      I was watching an analysis on the 2023 progress of the war. The author said that while he acknowledges that Russia seems to have the favour making the war a stalemate and took more strategic, albeit small, locations than Ukraine did; this leads to Catch-22 for Kremlin that the more Ukraine struggles, the more money Ukraine will receive which is not on Russia’s favour.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        261 year ago

        There’s also the fact that Russia never really seemed to account for most of its monetary and material taps getting turned off. When you’re (ALLEGEDLY) throwing conscripts out there without even a single full magazine of ammo, you’re burning through old post-WWII ammo stocks, and constantly having to beg old SSR states “hey can we buy/borrow some of your tanks and APCs please,” it doesn’t look great.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The trouble is, the material taps haven’t turned off they’ve been rerouted. Apparently enforcing sanctions is hard and more importantly also pisses off your donor base consisting of amoral business types. You can find any number of articles of Ukrainian complaining (even years into the war) that they find western electronics in downed Russian missiles.

  • Jeena
    link
    fedilink
    English
    441 year ago

    The question is, which time Afganistan, when Russia had to get out or the US?

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I can’t wait to hear what Habitual Linecrosser has to say about this.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      Was about to say, at least the US withdrawing from Afghanistan isn’t literally a cause of the entire country collapsing into 14 smaller new states and also the entire western bloc

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        Tbf it kinda is, because if the US had gone into Afghanistan with a plan to help Afghani’s fix infrastructure, homes, trade routes, etc things would have turned out far better than they did.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    I mean he’s kinda right if we don’t just commit to fully helping Ukraine instead of waffling with every budget, bill, and election.

    But him saying that is a good way to motivate stubborn Americans, so he can keep on saying it. It’ll get us going.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      How does it make sense? There aren’t any Americans fighting in Ukraine. And Russia are the ones that said they’d win in two weeks.

      • FaizalR
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        In terms of military support, America reduces their support for Ukraine because they need to support Israel more. Now just about time, they need more resources to fight Iran.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          The U.S. house just passed a series of bills where over $60 billion is going to Ukraine aid and $24 billion is going to Israel.

          You sure about that?

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1121 year ago

    Really?

    Last I checked, we haven’t had almost 500k casualties and lost billions in military craft to old mothballed weapons we since moved on from.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 year ago

      It’s actually kinda incredible for Russia to have not realized that the US is literally just letting Ukraine integrate itself into NATO standards by training on and building up NATO standard equipment as it runs out of the shitty Soviet era alternatives

      Meanwhile Moscow is instead developing a dependency on Iranian and Chinese made military hardware, stuff that neither is especially willing to part with given their own war plans.

      The US could 1000% just barely provide enough aid to tactically let Russia chew its teeth out trying to break Ukraine, but it’s sending what Ukraine needs to win whenever it can because the US sees Ukraine winning as more important than Russia losing at this point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately “barely enough” is closer to the mark. Ukraine should’ve had this funding last year and we should’ve been close to the next round at this point. If this is actually all America can muster when it is committed to “winning” then then thats a bit sad and scary considering the incompetent broke ass country we are trying to beat while having homecourt advantage.

        The only thing that gives me solace is the thought that this is carefully architected to bleed out Russia and not actually a show of real force.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          251 year ago

          You have to remember that half of the political parties in the US are owned by and promote Russian interests. That’s the only reason it took 8 months to get this funding approved, and it was approved in spite of the former fuckwit president.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                The Black Sea Ukrainian Shelf was discovered in 2012 to contain an estimated 2 trillion cubic meters of natural gas. Access to a huge portion of it depends on Crimea which was annexed in 2014.

      • BombOmOm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        US is literally just letting Ukraine integrate itself into NATO standards by training on and building up NATO standard equipment as it runs out of the shitty Soviet era alternatives

        Not just Ukraine, either! All the NATO Eastern Bloc countries donated their Soviet equipment (and much more) and are actively rearming and retraining their own militaries on NATO standard equipment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        US is literally just letting Ukraine integrate itself into NATO standards by training on and building up NATO standard equipment

        Excellent point. Due to the equipment Ukraine now has the west is at a point where they will stand to lose a lot of valuable technology if Russia wins making it necessary for western intervention if things go bad for Ukraine.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        At the risk of being jingoistic, this type of opponent is exactly what our military is designed to utterly destroy. If the US was an active participant it would have very quickly wiped the floor with the Russian army and would be dealng with Russian backed insurgents in the east.

        Ukraine has been beating them with the stuff we routinely throw away (when the Republicans don’t get in the way), I am convinced they have no non nuclear answer to our actual military.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          40 years ago maybe, but afaik after 20 years of Iraq and Afghanistan the us army has shifted quite far into focusing on counterinsurgency and away from fighting vs mass armor and artillery

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            The USA has plans, thousands of plans and how to modify them agains the russians (well the USSR), and that’s as important as having the right tools/weapons.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I mean, they’ve gotten way better at it, but most of their equipment and doctrine are still targeted at utterly destroying a near peer level threat. The f-22 wasn’t designed to fight insurgents, nor is it suited to that task.

            I would think that the USAF would happily establish and easily enforce a no fly zone over Ukraine and could probably pull it off within a few days of getting the order conservatively.

            There was the story a few years ago when a well equipped and trained Wagner battalion “accidentally” picked a flight with a US army unit or base in Syria and got immediately demolished.

            Writing this out definitely feels like braggadocio and it likely is. But I would think the Russians don’t want to find out why we don’t have universal healthcare first hand.

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        By contrast, the United States lost fewer than 2,500 service members in the entire 20 years we were in Afghanistan.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      What do you mean? There are only a handful of countries that were on the winning side of both World Wars and both the US and Russia are among them

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lots of Russians died in WWII, yes (actually just realizing I don’t know anything about the breakdown of casualties or deaths in WWI). But if you count the number of casualties inflicted I imagine it would scale with losses experienced. Except for the USA, since we kinda cheated with the whole Hiroshima and Nagasaki thing

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            In WWII, Russia had about 1 gun to every 5 soldiers.

            They literally had dudes running the lines without guns, and their battle plan was to pick up dead comrades weapons.

            Russia has absolutely no war cred. Win or lose. they’re a laughing stock, every time.

            How about that time they lost hundreds of soldiers to a single Finnish Sniper. They thought “The White Death” was a whole fucking army, it was a fucking local farmer.

            Russians are absolute legendary goobers on the battlefield, historically. And this Ukraine war is no different. Sending confused untrained teenagers to the front lines to abandon tanks. Classic Russia.

            Like jfc. Ls on Ls on Ls.

            • mars296
              link
              fedilink
              111 year ago

              The Soviets did not send soldiers to battle without weapons. That is a myth. They fought like hell in WW2 and finishing that is stupid.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Russia lost in WWI before it ended, they were essentially knocked out of the war before the revolution and Bolsheviks made the official.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        Russia made it through WWII solely because of US aid.

        That aid is now flowing into Ukraine.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Kremlin warned that American support for Ukraine could turn into a decade-long folly, urging the U.S. to not oppose its invasion of the country as Congress appears set to pass a $60 billion aid package.

    The aid deal comes after months of negotiations, with support for Ukraine wavering among American conservatives as the Russian military gains ground after two years of fighting.

    The House passed a broad foreign aid spending bill on Saturday that includes funds for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan for a total of $95 billion.

    “With the boost that would come from military assistance‚ both practically and psychologically — Ukrainians are entirely capable of holding their own through 2024 and puncturing Putin’s arrogant view that time is on his side,” Burns said Thursday.

    “Without supplemental assistance, this picture is a lot more dire, and there is a very real risk that the Ukrainians could lose on the battlefield by the end of 2024,” he continued.

    The U.S. and NATO allies have refused to send their own troops to Ukraine, the fundamental difference between the conflict and those in Vietnam and Afghanistan.


    The original article contains 295 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 38%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    It would be nice to see the US launch a full assault on the soviets. FULL ON. I can dream can’t I?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Russia did so well in Afghanistan after the US supplied the afghans with weapons and training.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    Because Russia had so much success against Afghanistan themselves. Pretty sure they’ve had their asses handed to them in the far east as well.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Because Russia had so much success against Afghanistan themselves.

      Despite nominally being a staunch supporter of George Bush Jr’s War on Terror, Afghanistan was one place Putin absolutely refused to give support. You can call it cowardice or wisdom or simply being once-bitten-twice-shy, but the Graveyard of Empires isn’t the place you send in troops casually.

      Pretty sure they’ve had their asses handed to them in the far east as well.

      Do you mean the Russo-Japan War? That was over a century ago.

      With the exception of the First Chechen War, The Post-'91 Russian Federation’s record on the battlefield has generally been successful.

      Russian military leadership is well-blooded and one of the only institutions that wasn’t gutted by Perestroika. The folks who were laughing up their sleeves at the “Oversized Gas Station” when the Ukraine fight started may have underestimated the monster that was unleashed.

  • Hossenfeffer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    Russia says US support for Ukraine will end as ‘humiliating fiasco’ like ‘Vietnam and Afghanistan’

    Of course that Is what Russia says. They were hardly likely to say ‘That’‘s it, game over for us, we’re withdrawing all our troops now.’