• Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    581 year ago

    My understanding is that they sent V’Ger a command to do “something,” and then the gibberish it was sending changed, and that was the “here’s everything” signal.

    And yeah, I’m calling it V’Ger from now on.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    521 year ago

    When I hear what they did, I was blown away. A 50 year old computer (that was probably designed a decade before launching) and the geniuses that built that put in the facility to completely reprogram it a light-day away.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    I just have to imagine how interesting of a challenege that is. Kinda like when old games only had 300kb to store all their data on so you had to program cool tricks to get it all to work.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      No yeah, it’s like that plus the thing is a light day away, and on top of that malfunctioning on a hardware level. Incredible

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        It’s like you already have a 300kb game on a cartridge, but it doesn’t work for some unknown reason. Also you don’t actually have the cartridge, some randy in Greenland does. And they only answer emails once every 2 days or so.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Meanwhile here on Earth, we need to login using two accounts to access Helldivers 2. And even got pulled from many countries. What a time to be alive.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    951 year ago

    Keep in mind too these guys are writing and reading in like assembly or some precursor to it.

    I can only imagine the number of checks and rechecks they probably go through before they press the “send” button. Especially now.

    This is nothing like my loosey goosey programming where I just hit compile or download and just wait to see if my change works the way I expect…

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 year ago

      they almost certainly have a hardware spare, or at the very least, an accurately simulated version of it, because again, this is 50 year old hardware. So it’s pretty easy to just simulate it.

      But yeah they are almost certainly pulling some really fucked QA on this shit.

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          NASA has claimed to have never written a bug in a shipped piece of code from what i can recall off the top of my head.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2571 year ago

    To me, the physics of the situation makes this all the more impressive.

    Voyager has a 23 watt radio. That’s about 10x as much power as a cell phone’s radio, but it’s still small. Voyager is so far away it takes 22.5 hours for the signal to get to earth traveling at light speed. This is a radio beam, not a laser, but it’s extraordinarily tight beam for a radio, with the focus only 0.5 degrees wide, but that means it’s still 1000x wider than the earth when it arrives. It’s being received by some of the biggest antennas ever made, but they’re still only 70m wide, so each one only receives a tiny fraction of the power the power transmitted. So, they’re decoding a signal that’s 10^-18 watts.

    So, not only are you debugging a system created half a century ago without being able to see or touch it, you’re doing it with a 2-day delay to see what your changes do, and using the most absurdly powerful radios just to send signals.

    The computer side of things is also even more impressive than this makes it sound. A memory chip failed. On Earth, you’d probably try to figure that out by physically looking at the hardware, and then probing it with a multimeter or an oscilloscope or something. They couldn’t do that. They had to debug it by watching the program as it ran and as it tried to use this faulty memory chip and failed in interesting ways. They could interact with it, but only on a 2 day delay. They also had to know that any wrong move and the little control they had over it could fail and it would be fully dead.

    So, a malfunctioning computer that you can only interact with at 40 bits per second, that takes 2 full days between every send and receive, that has flaky hardware and was designed more than 50 years ago.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Is there a Voyager 1, uh…emulator or something? Like something NASA would use to test the new programming on before hitting send?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Today you would have a physical duplicate of something in orbit to test code changes on before you push code to something in orbit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      661 year ago

      Finally I can put some take into this. I’ve worked in memory testing for years and I’ll tell you that it’s actually pretty expected for a memory cell to fail after some time. So much so that what we typically do is build in redundancy into the memory cells. We add more memory cells than we might activate at any given time. When shit goes awry, we can reprogram the memory controller to remap the used memory cells so that the bad cells are mapped out and unused ones are mapped in. We don’t probe memory cells typically unless we’re doing some type of in depth failure analysis. usually we just run a series of algorithms that test each cell and identify which ones aren’t responding correctly, then map those out.

      None of this is to diminish the engineering challenges that they faced, just to help give an appreciation for the technical mechanisms we’ve improved over the last few decades

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        what we typically do is build in redundancy into the memory cells

        Do you know how long that has been going on? Because Voyager is pretty old hardware.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        pretty expected for a memory cell to fail after some time

        50 years is plenty of time for the first memory chip to fail most systems would face total failure by multiple defects in half the time WITH physical maintenance.

        Also remember it was built with tools from the 70s. Which is probably an advantage, given everything else is still going

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Also remember it was built with tools from the 70s. Which is probably an advantage

          Definitely an advantage. Even without planned obsolescence the olden electronics are pretty tolerant of any outside interference compared to the modern ones.

      • KubeRoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        Oh screw that, that’s an emotional post from somebody sharing their reaction, and I’m fucking STOKED to hear about it, can’t believe I missed the news!

  • pruwyben
    link
    fedilink
    English
    571 year ago

    Why do Tumblr users approach every topic like a manic street preacher?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    127
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s hard to explain how significant the Voyager 1 probe is in terms of human history. Scientists knew as they were building it that they were making something that would have a significant impact on humanity. It’s the first man made object to leave the heliosphere and properly enter the interstellar medium, and this was always just a secondary goal of the probe. It was primarily intended to explore the gas giants, especially the Jovian lunar system. It did its job perfectly and gave us so many scientific discoveries just within our solar system.

    And I think there’s something sobering about the image of it going on a long, endless road trip into the galactic ether with no destination. It’s a pretty amazing way to retire. The fact that even today we get scientific data from Voyager, that so far away we can still communicate with it and control it, is an unbelievable achievement of human ingenuity and scientific progress. If you’ve never seen the image the Pale Blue Dot you should see it. That linked picture is a revised version of the image made by Nasa and released in 2020. It’s part of a group of the last pictures ever taken by Voyager 1 on February 14th 1990, a picture of Earth from 6 billion kilometers away. It’s one of my favorite pictures, and it kinda blows my mind every time I see it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      561 year ago

      The pale blue dot photo always makes me tear up. We’re so small and insignificant in such a grand universe and I’m crushed that I can’t explore it.

      • Dyskolos
        link
        fedilink
        English
        461 year ago

        There will always be a “step further we’d love to see but won’t”. Let’s be glad we’re in that step which included this photo and the inherent magnificence in it.

        It totally beats being one of the earlier humans who just wondered what the lights in the sky might be. Probably gods or something.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          There will always be a “step further we’d love to see but won’t”

          I dunno, it could be really bad out there. We like to have really romanticized versions of space exploration in our brain. Like finding I habitable planets and other intelligent life. But what if that other intelligent life is super far advanced, and also capitalists. And they figured out how to inject advertisements into brains. And they want to share their technology with us.

          • Dyskolos
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            If they’d be super far advanced, they most likely won’t be capitalists 😁

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Let’s hope we figure something out before every other Galaxy moves away from us faster than the speed of light.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      451 year ago

      As someone who recently switched from AWS to Azure I feel your pain.

      Best part is when you finally have a working solution, Microsoft sends you an email that it’s being deprecated.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh I switched jobs, so not switch as in migrate.

          The industry I work in now is very conservative, so Microsoft is a brand people know and “trust”. Amazon is scary and new.

        • Scribbd
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Chances are that Microsoft won management over with discounts.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1131 year ago

    I think the term “metal” is overused, but this is probably the most metal thing a programmer could possibly do besides join a metal band.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    451 year ago

    People always underestimate the high level NASA works at. Everyone bitches and moans, especially Musk simps, about how long SLS took to make and its expense, but it worked right the first time. In the case of the Voyager spacecraft, they are working with tech so old, all the original engineers are retired or dead. NASA rocks.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I understand your point and completely agree that NASA has produced some amazing technological feats, but we could probably use a different example than the SLS to highlight their accomplishments. Even with supposedly repurposed rocket engines and technology from the Shuttle era, that project is billions of dollars over budget and years behind schedule. If you want to highlight how amazing it is that SLS has actually flown with all the political manipulations associated with it, then I’d probably agree with you in that sense. This is no criticism of the engineers, but to completely ignore the issues of this project as a whole, not just financially related, seems to be a bit disingenuous.

      Here’s a good article from Berger talking about what the Government Accountability Office thinks of the project: https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/09/nasa-finally-admits-what-everyone-already-knows-sls-is-unaffordable

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        The budget wasn’t really relevant to my point. And it did work correctly the first time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          All I’m saying is you could choose a better example, which NASA is full of them.

          But lets say I built you a car that already came with an engine and some other important things, just to make it quicker and cheaper to get that car in your hands. Unfortunately, you want me to complete work on the car in five different states and use components from those areas. Guess what, the car is now about $5 million over budget and 5 years behind schedule. Not only that, but we encountered issues during the first test that are going to require more fixes ($$$) and more delays for the second test.

          In this situation, you’re saying it’s great, it ran correctly the first time because it went down the road and back, and budgets and timelines don’t matter. I’m saying ehhhh, not really - we’re over budget by millions, delayed by years, and there were issues, even though we repurposed stuff that was in a car that actually ran a few years back. It’s great we built the car, but the project itself isn’t something that I would showcase as my best work.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I think they’re saying intellectually the work is amazing.

            Ignoring all other factors they do shit right

  • Björn Tantau
    link
    fedilink
    English
    961 year ago

    I was already impressed when they managed to diagnose a single bit flip a few years ago.