- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
He’s wrong!
Take it up with the legislature, pal.
Who does a guy need to bribe around here to get something changed?
HOT TACO SANDWICHES!
Does the Indiana judge know what a Torta is? Does he not realize that there’s… actual sandwiches (there’s like 7-8 different sandwiches). Tacos and burritos are NOT sandwiches.
I’m Latino, not of Mexican origin. However, sometimes I prefer their sandwich over any other dish. And I normally would buy two of them.
But is a quesadilla a sandwich?
removed by mod
but the tortilla does not contain a leavening agent and therefore cannot be considered bread.
I have to disagree here. It is unleavened bread.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unleavened_bread
I’m surprised Merriam-Webster doesn’t know that.
removed by mod
Idk man I consider wraps as sandwiches
removed by mod
this is definitely an indiana activity.
That much i can confirm.
I read Indiana Jones. That’s all I camr here to say.
Goodbye
Flies away
Aside from the discussion about whether the taco or burrito constitutes a sandwich, I think the judge made the correct ruling. The retail agreement says no “traditional fast food” can set up shop in that mall, and specifically cites drive thrus and outdoor seating as the reasons.
The strip mall owners probably don’t want businesses taking over common sidewalks or creating more traffic than the shared parking lot can handle. So long as they don’t have those, I don’t see any reason a Mexican food place can’t fit entirely into the leased space.
E: also based on their website this place looks bangin
Okay, who will go to court for the cereal soup question next?
First, you need to find a place where soup restaurants have some special privileges compared to normal businesses. Then, just start a soup restaurant there and serve cereal and milk instead.
If you can’t find such a place, then maybe you can ask your local politicians to pass a bill like that. Would be nice if soup restaurants had to pay only half the amount of taxes compared to everyone else. Would be good for the owners, and fun for everyone else to see where the resulting legal battles go. Suddenly, you would find lots of companies selling just about anything and everything as soup and claiming they don’t have to pay the usual taxes.
I TOLD YOU! I TOLD YOU ALL!!! EVERYONE LAUGHED WHEN I SAID A HOT DOG ON A BUN IS A SANDWICH WELL WHO’S LAUGHING NOW??
I would have argued with you before today, because a hot dog is clearly a taco. But I guess if tacos are sandwiches, then by the transitive property, it is also a sandwich.
Does anybody know what the orange-ish sauce in the picture is?
When I go to the place this is about, thats just Red Sauce.
It’s hot, like fucking real hot. Like make you reconsider your choices if you put it on your taco too liberally, but it’s so good.
They might be in indiana
Reminder that legality is not based on morality.
Or common sense.
KANGAROO COURT!
We need to bring in experts on this matter. Someone summon Guy Fieri.
Good enough for New York, good enough for Indiana
https://www.vox.com/2014/7/22/5877325/new-york-law-sandwich-burrito-tax
Indiana is fuckin stupid
Things like this seem silly but there’s likely laws or protection that use sandwiches in their wording.
Defining things you want them to apply to as sandwiches is easier than changing the law.
Makes more sense than the time Indiana tried to define pi as 3.2. The only reason it didn’t was because a professor from Purdue was in Indianapolis on unrelated business and convinced Indiana’s senate to table the bill.
Of course, we know today that such a thing couldn’t happen since Indiana’s legislature would laugh at the woke lib and pass it just to trigger him.
Well two decimal places invokes the devil, as does rounding correctly.
“sig what now? Sounds like the trans liberal leftist nazi woke agenda to me”
But why do they even have laws about sandwiches in the first place?
Read the article. It’s a zoning issue.
I’m sorry sir, this is a sandwich only zone. You and your parfait need to leave immediately.
we’re just loading the parfait i swear
Something existing does not answer the question about WHY it exists.
I’m not sure if this particular article explained, but I live here. He signed an agreement that stated that “any food business allowed would be a ‘subway’ style food business”
That’s the issue
Edit: I’m a huge fan of this taco place, just stating what’s going on. I hate subway.
That isn’t a law or zoning then, just some contract dispute.
Yea, which is why it’s in court I believe. It’s escalated to this point.
They are trying to exclude traditional fast food like McD’s,Wendy’s, etc.
WHY
Cuz fuck mcds you dense prick
But not fuck Subway?
K
deleted by creator
Could be food safety, taxes, production rules or any number of things.
The article does not mention any sandwich specific laws, just contract stuff about what kind of restaurant can be in a strip mall.
That is why in California, bees are fish
Someone is going to find stuff like this in the future and think we’re dumb as fuck. They’d be right, but not because of this.
also, hippos and capybara are fish.
