• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    In response to that Pyongyang announced early this week that it will be sending troops in the form of a military engineering unit to support Russian forces on the ground in the Donetsk region. The troops are expected to arrive on the battlefield as soon as next month.

    One engineering unit isn’t much, but perhaps there is more to come. It didn’t say anything in the article about future commitments.

    Ilya Ponomarev, a former Russian member of parliament told the UK’s Daily Express that North Korea has become an important bridge between the Kremlin and China. Beijing can indirectly transfer military equipment to Moscow through Pyongyang without falling foul of Western sanctions.

    As he explained: “North Korea is one of key Russian partners and the meaning of the rationale behind them becoming such a partner is because they are acting as a bridge between China and Russia.

    “Essentially all the military equipment that is delivered from North Korea was developed for the North Koreans by the Chinese.

    Perhaps this is less about North Korea then it appears on the surface. I wonder what Russia is giving China for this help?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    Sometime back kim was crying so that women make more babies, now he is sending men to his friend. And we know the mortality rate of North Korea. I have never seen a country run out of people, I think I will see it soon

  • NoSpiritAnimal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    News in 30 days: Digestive Parasites are up 70,000% in Eastern Ukraine.

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    I’m sure that will be really helpful, I bet they’re really well trained and have lots of modern equipment that isn’t just painted wood.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 year ago

    These guys will have a better time in Ukrainian captivity than 99% of the population at home…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    So did I hear that the US is considering letting “contractors” take Ukrainian contracts? Blackrock would ruin these morons!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So did I hear that the US is considering letting “contractors” take Ukrainian contracts?

      The US has been sending “advisers” into Ukraine since the war began. And we’ve had intelligence officers in this country for decades.

      Blackrock would ruin these morons!

      Mercenaries and auxiliaries are useless and dangerous; and if one holds his state based on these arms, he will stand neither firm nor safe; for they are disunited, ambitious, and without discipline, unfaithful, valiant before friends, cowardly before enemies; they have neither the fear of God nor fidelity to men, and destruction is deferred only so long as the attack is; for in peace one is robbed by them, and in war by the enemy. The fact is, they have no other attraction or reason for keeping the field than a trifle of stipend, which is not sufficient to make them willing to die for you.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1361 year ago

    I hope everyone that keeps down voting me for talking about WW3 are right…

    But man, it really is starting to look like WW3

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      a yes, one country against the entire world, truly the ww3 of all times, we downvote your take is stupid

    • DominusOfMegadeus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To me, it does not seem wise to just let these two continue along this path, but I am certain there are numerous internet experts out there who can explain to me why we should not intervene.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        251 year ago

        How would you propose the intervention happen? Sit Kim down and say “bad boy, stop it”?

        What can “the west” really do to prevent or stop troops from NK being sent to the Ukraine front?

        Russia isn’t going to stop them from crossing their border.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          What can “the west” really do to prevent or stop troops from NK being sent to the Ukraine front?

          Drop leaflets on them inviting them to surrender and upgrade their lives to South Korean national.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            upgrade their lives to South Korean national

            Considering that North Korean defectors are a heavily discriminated against minority in South Korea, this is unlikely to be an attractive offer.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Considering that North Korea is literally the worse country in the world to live it, this is super likely to be an attractive offer.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                the worse country in the world to live it

                worst* in*

                And I dunno about that. North Korea’s average soldier age isn’t forty-five.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Nobody’s average soldier age is 45. Has nothing to do NK being rock bottom in country rankings. And the younger you are in NK, the more you are probably screwed.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            To be honest that’s likely the most effective. Though not very effective compared to threats against family.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What can “the west” really do to prevent or stop troops from NK being sent to the Ukraine front?

          Stop sabotaging peace talks, pressure Ukraine to accept the terms as they exist now before they get worse, lift the sanctions on North Korea in order to incentivize them to integrate with the rest of the world, withdraw US military equipment from South Korea. Kim Jong Un is often presented in American news like a crazy person, but truthfully he (and the rest of the actors in the North Korean state) is a rational actor and the “hermit kingdom” is not an aspirational goal of the DPRK but a state of affairs that has been forced upon them by decades of sanctions and isolation - give them a reason to be neutral, and assurances that they won’t be stabbed in the back (as they have been in previous deals with Western countries), and there’s a good chance they’ll take it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Hmmm. While that would technically stop Russia from needing the troops in Ukraine, I don’t think that just giving a dictator sections of land because he claimed them is a good path.

            “Just give up when I take your shit” is a shit take.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Ukraine had an opportunity to keep the Donbas by implementing the Minsk Agreements. Zelensky literally ran on the promise of ending the war and implementing the agreements. This path was not chosen by Russia, it was chosen by the Ukrainians, who refused to reconcile with their Russian-speaking minority groups. With every passing day, the deal will only get worse for the Ukrainians, and the sooner they accept the better the deal they will get.

              But instead America and Europe are ready to do whatever it takes to throw every single Ukrainian body directly into Russian (and North Korean) artillery.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                “They could have not gotten invaded if they just gave up their rights to protect themselves!”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        You mean Russia and NK?

        Or you meant the two countries in the middle of illegal invasions: Russia and Israel?

        • dactylotheca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          291 year ago

          Fuck Israel, but that being said what the hell does Israel have to do with anything here?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            151 year ago

            Israel and Hezbollah have been exchanging rocket fire, and Israel is talking about a ground invasion.

            Hezbollah has a defense treaty with Iran, Iraq, Russia, and another ME country I’m blanking on.

            If Israel invaded Lebanon in an attack on Hezbollah, that draws in Russia, and likely NK.

            Israel and Russia are the two countries invading others that I believe are the primary drivers towards WW3. NK is just a long for the ride until/unless they launch an attack on SK.

            But I think before that happens, we’ll solidly be in WW3. I think NK is onboard now, with the promise to be backed against SK later. No one is attack NK unless NK starts some shit, they don’t need a defense treaty.

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      751 year ago

      People forgot how long it took the other world wars to really get rolling. (Presumably because they weren’t alive when it happened.)

      I’m also of the opinion that unless something happens to de-escalate this conflict it will inevitably draw Europe, the US, and China in.

      • sunzu
        link
        fedilink
        361 year ago

        Everybody is already in and picked the side…

        We just waiting for the other shoe to drop… Is US Marines landing in Crimea or other wild scenario where everyone goes: " well damn and that’s how it turned into ww3"

        • bluGill
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          We are also hoping it doesn’t turn into WWIII. It could for sure, but there is the possibility that things can calm down in a few years.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It didn’t take long at all for WW1 to get rolling.

        June 28, 1914 Archduke Francis Ferdinand is assassinated.

        July 28, 1914 Austria-Hungary declares war on Serbia, beginning World War I

        WW1 has an insane pace compared to WW2. Battles where a single day has casualty numbers that compare to an entire month past D-day.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        301 year ago

        They also forget about the 4+1 treaty.

        If Israel expands to other countries, it would draw Russia in on their side, and the US on Israel’s

        Which now also brings NK in. And we’ve got a multi front multi country war with two distinct fronts.

        People might not call it WW3, but there’s a world war coming straight ahead, and as good of a movie as it was, I dont want to recreate the Titanic

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      451 year ago

      To me it looks like N Korea wanting to acquire some direct combat experience to continue to develop their skills and capabilities.

      But yes, personally I was not expecting this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      The truth is, we don’t fucking know. No expert would tell you that Russia is ready to invade Ukraine, and here we go.

      • bluGill
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Be careful here. Experts would tell you that Russia was going to invade Ukraine. However as you say Russia wasn’t ready for it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I’m not an expert either and I could have predicted the invasion based on:

        • huge buildup of troops in preparation for invasion
        • 8 years prior they had invaded after saying they wouldn’t
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I wasn’t even an expert but I knew they would do that just by distribution of military. Did not expect Civ 5 to be accurate, tho

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      30
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not really, proxy wars have been fought with multiple nations before.

      … practically everyone was in Syria… Russia, Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Armenia, Qatar, The USA, ISIS, Al-queda, and Syrian forces.

      • Pennomi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        Not exactly a proxy war when Russian troops are personally in Ukraine. That’s just a war.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s a proxy war because the two major powers are fighting in an area neither of them own.

          Iraq was a proxy war, even though US troops were there.

          • Pennomi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            I’d say not since Russia is trying to directly annex those portions of Ukraine. How is that a proxy?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          It’s not a proxy war between Russia and the US. It’s a proxy war between China and the US.

          Russia and Ukraine are the pawns

        • Skua
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The Korean War had over a million NATO troops and also tens of thousands of Soviet troops and, somehow, remained a proxy war. A particularly bloody one, but there was still no actual open full-scale warfare between NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Even China and America remained officially at peace, despite making up the majority of the forces on each side

            • Skua
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Apologies, I was using “NATO troops” as a shorthand for the large number of countries involved rather than the specific command structure. You are right to bring that up

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Russia is actively in Syria from the end of 2015 as an official belligerent, it’s not something new for Russia to fight directly while others use only proxies.

          But I can see your point; still - officially - this is only a three days military operation. When that stance will finally change in the official channels, it will mean they can’t hold the mask anymore.

    • Chainweasel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They didn’t start calling WWII what it is until 1944, but I think we can all agree it didn’t start in 1944.
      Just like later historians placed the start of WWII on multiple different events depending on which country you’re in, the start of World War III will be long before we start calling it that.
      I’m in the camp that the start of WW3 will be the Russian invasion of Ukraine if things continue to escalate the way they’re going, because that’s when you really started seeing lines being drawn between the axis and allies.
      Russia, China, Iran, and NK are the most recognizable names that have aligned themselves with the axis so far.
      The lines are already drawn and future events will dictate whether or not we’re currently living in WW3 today.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        Also, the winners will interprete who gets to be the axis and who gets to be the allies in history books…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Pretty sure Iran adopted “Axis of Resistance” already. Least they already know what side they are on.

          Really getting sick of people deciding to just like…starting shit instead of focusing on constructive competitions like science or space races to other planets. Why do people feel the need to kill the shit out of each other and subjugate their population whilst climate change is bearing down on us? :p

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            I am also sick to the core about this aspect of humanity. I feel that we as a species are just about developed enough to understand how a better world would look like, and how people should act, what’s “the right thing to do” - and very much not developed enough to overcome our egoism and narcissism to make it happen, so we do the wrong thing despite knowing better far too often.

            • bluGill
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              For most of history you would be better off if you could kill the next village over. You want to be friends with the people in your village, but if you kill the next one you can expand your farm/hunting/gathering grounds and then leave it to your kids - while otherwise you won’t have enough food for all the kids and your DNA is in danger of not getting passed on.

              In our modern world we mostly have plenty of food (and when we don’t lack of land is not the issue), but that isn’t what our DNA is evolved to “think”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                For most of history you would be better off if you could kill the next village over.

                That is an incredibly stupid take. For most of history, the planet was so vast that people had plenty of room to hunt / farm / whatever. And no, killing other humans is not in our DNA, the only people who feel like that are those with brain damage / development defects.

                • bluGill
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Most of the planet was not accessable. It was there but your local population grew until the land couldn’t support more. There wasn’t much opportunity to move as the surronding villages had the same problem.

                  of course when a famon came you got a few generations of peace here and there

      • BigFig
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        And some would argue that WW1 was WW2 and WW2 WAS WW3. The 7 years war/French and Indian (not French vs Indian) war are commonly referred to as the real first world war. And then the Nepoleonic wars are similarly thought of by some to have been a world war of sorts

        • bluGill
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          WWI was called the great war, and the war to end all wars until WWII broke out. I sometimes call WWII just the great war part 2 - the treaties that “ended” WWI were clearly setup (on hindsight!) to make the war break out again in the future when Germany got sick of those treaties.

          The point is names are added after the fact and often don’t make a lot of sense if you know details.

          • BigFig
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            For sure, I know allll about that stuff (former history teacher)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              He was right for the wrong reasons. He believed the treaty was too lenient, when in retrospect it seems pretty clear that the punitive nature of the treaty was a significant factor in Hitler rising to power and then WW2 starting.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Pretty asymmetric that isn’t it. On one side you have a nation that is rapidly running out of, well basically everything, and on the other side you’ve got an alliance of nation states which contain among many other things the largest most powerful military on the planet.

      Finally the nation that is running out of resources is now getting military support from quite possibly the worst place they could get it from.

      It’s going to be one of those ridiculous situations that only happens in Civilization, where you’re bombing cavemen with nukes because your adversary has failed to advance through the tech tree fast enough.

      • bluGill
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Unfortunately China is not running out of everything and they are looking like they might back Russia here. Iran is also backing Russia and not to be underestimated.

      • skulblaka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I honestly think he might legitimately believe that a couple platoons of NK soldiers will clear this whole mess right up and then the world will have to take them seriously.

        The North Korean leadership is not exactly well known for their excellent grasp of reality.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          My thought is maybe either food or arms or research for arms production/nukes from the Russians.

          Edit Addendum: the article says as much actually lol. This is what I get for just trying to get an idea of NK actions from the title.

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            It never leads anywhere though. North Korea has always been fobbed off with decades-old technology,it’s not like they will know.

            So everyone continues to ignore them because they continue not to be a threat. It’s not in Russia’s interest to give them anything really advanced, assuming they have anything left to give them. The best thing Russia could give them would be infrastructure engineers but they’re probably not interested in their own populace enough to consider that a worthy exchange.

  • AlexanderESmith
    link
    fedilink
    401 year ago

    I’m putting good money down that they either have mass surrenders, or they’re just too malnourished to fight.

    Possibly both.

    Oh, oh! Or they refuse to come back from Russia, and that pisses off NK .

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      481 year ago

      My money is on NK never sending anyone and this all being political theater. Please. Please please please.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I suspect NK will kill their families if they refuse to come back, but I’d be completely unsurprised if some fake their deaths and try to disappear.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Then it’d just be NK sending a bunch of soldiers who get to emigrate to Ukraine.

  • Eww
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 year ago

    Curious how many will defect once outside North Korea.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      261 year ago

      According to hexbear you would have to have some deranged lib mind to believe any would want to.

        • [email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          We defederated them a while ago over here. Along with some right wing instances too. The extremists from either side of the political spectrum really spoil the experience.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Maybe on account of the communities I subscribe to, but I’ve personally not come across right wing extremism on Lemmy. The tankies, though … so prevalent. Anyways, by server blocking hexbear it’s reduced by 90%.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        NKers are simultaneously brainwashed morons who follow their leader with fanatical delusion and utterly naive children who can be lured to defection by a few pieces of candy and a charming smile.

        The hexbears are too stupid to realize that all Koreans yearn for the unlimited freedom of their Southern neighbors and yet too wicked to believe the unvarnished truths of such media luminaries as Yeomni Park. They should all be sent to North Korea to eat grass and toil in the mines and get beaten to a pulp by Kim’s totalitarian police, then repatriated so that they can apologize for their ignorant beliefs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Those children are completely delusional. I saw a thread about why the entire country is unlit at night which was a parody of itself. I wonder what their demographics are, if not 100% bots.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Surprisingly a lot of them on the Lemmy communities are also trans.

          I’m not sure they’re aware how LGBT people are treated in those countries. Either that or just willful ignorance I guess

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Most of the ones that do end up regretting it /shrug

        This is wrong - it’s not that they end up regretting it so much as most of them never want to go to South Korea in the first place.

        • AbsentBird
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          About 18% of North Korean defectors regret it.

          The number one reason is wanting to see family and friends who are still trapped in North Korea.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            About 18% of North Korean defectors regret it.

            Around 20% of defectors have considered returning to North Korea. But that has less to do with the appeal of the North than the poor treatment of expats in the South.

            The South Korean immigration and labor laws make finding work south of the border incredibly difficult. North Korean expats are confined to menial service sector and grueling industrial work while being largely cut out of South Korean social life due to heavy stigmas against them. Its an incredibly hard life and not remotely like the glamorous existence of social elites that Americans claim drive the periodic defections.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              They need access to a better place. I suppose they just get financially stuck in S Korea? Or do the move on to other countries too, more willing to give them a chance?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                North Korean expats are functionally stateless, so it is very difficult to leave South Korea even when they do have money.

                The largest portion of the Korean diaspora live in China and Russia.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Is it difficult because airlines and whatnot won’t carry them, or because the receiving country won’t let them immigrate due to being “stateless”?

                  Are they stateless in a way someone coming from Bolivia to the US isn’t, because NK’s outside of some globally-recognized state system? I’ve never considered this before.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  Why don’t we have a law for North Korea like the Cuban Adjustment Act that allows anyone who makes it out of the country to quickly become a permanent resident, without regard for how they got out of their country. The situation seems fairly similar, where encouraging more defectors makes the target country look bad, and it can deprive them of workers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The 18% figure is a biased sample from an anti-DPRK NGO. More comprehensive research into North Korean defectors by Cho Cheon-hyeon for his book Defectors indicate that most North Korean defectors simply want to make money in China, with only about 40% of defectors wanting to go to South Korea.

            So I did misremember, but my point still stands on the fact that most of them don’t want to defect to South Korea, even before taking into account that even at their 2009 peak defectors were a tiny fraction of a percent of North Korea’s population and the existence of them in no way implicates all of North Korean society in secretly wanting to escape.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              That last statement is meaningless given the crazy levels of security they have on keeping people in. If they took away all the restrictions on leaving then the numbers would go through the roof.

            • AbsentBird
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              If so few people want to leave, why are so many resources directed into preventing people from leaving? I can’t think of any other country that works so hard to keep their citizens from escaping. Usually the largest barrier to leaving a country is the policies of the country you’re entering.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                The fact they’re called defectors says it all. Anywhere else they’d be called emigrants.

    • JohnEdwa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Very few, as North Korea hand picks everyone who gets to leave by essentially keeping their entire family hostage, and any “traitor family” will find them sentenced to life in prison/labour camp - including any children born in those camps.

      And they are places you wouldn’t wish for anyone to end up in, especially your loved ones.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    Funny thing is the eventual survivor won’t be brought back to NK after having seen the lavish lifes the russians live…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    Does north korea have actually good military power? I’ve seen their parades here and there, but does anyone know if they have updated equipment, trained military personnel, good intelligence, etc?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      Military is the only thing they have. It might not be the most modern, but they have more artilery shells than any other country. Other stockpiles are huge AF as well. Almost 4% of their population are in active military service and 2% more are reservists. In terms of head count, they have almost as many active personel as Russia while having a fraction of population. Plenty of disposable meat!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        It’s all smoke and mirrors, the majority of their stockpiles would be bordering on defunct. Modern equipment they have is far and few between, their training is subpar.

        Plenty of disposable meat is certainly correct though!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          You may be right. We just saw how Russia performed in the war in Ukraine despite the prior years of flexing lol. It’s not impossible to believe that the North Korean military is the same.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Agreed that they have a pretty big military in terms of raw numbers. I’m not going to discuss quality because the biggest question mark here is force projection.

        How are they planning on sending over any significant manpower and supplies across 2800km?

        They don’t even have a navy capable of circumnavigating the korean peninsula, much less make the trip to Ukraine or the wrong side of Russia.

        They have 2 transport aircraft, the bigger of the 2 has a max passenger capacity of 44 pax. Neither of those have the range to get near Ukraine when flying fully fueled, nevermind if it were fully loaded.

    • Caveman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      They have massive amount of soldiers and are good and making artillery and missiles. It is a big black box however since they haven’t been engaged in a conflict recently so all their troops lack experience.

      Their economy is practically built for conflict so it shouldn’t be taken lightly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        It is a big black box however since they haven’t been engaged in a conflict recently so all their troops lack experience.

        They’ve been deployed to Syria since at least 2019 and assisted Hezbollah in its tunnel networks going back decades.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Yeah, I don’t think numbers is everything, lacking experience or leadership can tip the balance against you in a blink

        • Caveman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Yeah, I have a feeling that they will have very low morale because of lack of motivating factors. Desertion might also become a massive problem since this is one of the few ways to get out of the DPRK.

          • Phoenixz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Few will desert as their families back home will pay the price for that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          True, but we’ve already seen from Russia what sheer numbers can do, even under-equipped and untrained.