• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    So did I hear that the US is considering letting “contractors” take Ukrainian contracts? Blackrock would ruin these morons!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So did I hear that the US is considering letting “contractors” take Ukrainian contracts?

      The US has been sending “advisers” into Ukraine since the war began. And we’ve had intelligence officers in this country for decades.

      Blackrock would ruin these morons!

      Mercenaries and auxiliaries are useless and dangerous; and if one holds his state based on these arms, he will stand neither firm nor safe; for they are disunited, ambitious, and without discipline, unfaithful, valiant before friends, cowardly before enemies; they have neither the fear of God nor fidelity to men, and destruction is deferred only so long as the attack is; for in peace one is robbed by them, and in war by the enemy. The fact is, they have no other attraction or reason for keeping the field than a trifle of stipend, which is not sufficient to make them willing to die for you.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    Sometime back kim was crying so that women make more babies, now he is sending men to his friend. And we know the mortality rate of North Korea. I have never seen a country run out of people, I think I will see it soon

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1461 year ago

    Not to worry! Li’l Kim’s Bestest Buddy and Honorary Number One Chief Saluter will be ready to help NK help Russia destroy Ukraine and NATO.

    All you MAGA service “losers” and “suckers” got quite the cognitive dissonance jam rockin’ huh.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Biden broke all ties with North Korea after Trump. Reverting to the old demand to denuclearize before for any negotiations and imposing more sanctions.

      As we have learned from Ukraine. no sane country should ever give up their nukes because they become a prime target for invasion. If Ukraine still had nukes Russia would never have invaded.

      Biden has also imposed sanctions on NK which were undone by Trump

      Now I’m not a an NK fan but I’m not sure why people think pushing NK away would make them more friendly. Unlike the past where American sanctions spelled doom and America could bend any country to their will, China and Russia are now picking up the countries America pushes away.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        NK & SK were making historical progress towards reunification until Kim and Trump met. Look at the pics from the summit and the timeline of inter Korean relations and it’s clear as day. He’s the reason relations went downhill.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        China and Russia are now picking up the countries America pushes away.

        Pretty sure North Korea has been allied with China and Russia for way longer than the US has been “pushing them away”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well yes because America had been pushing North Korea away.

          Trump tried to lay contact with NK. He might not have had pure motives for it. He usually doesn’t. But the action itself is not the problem.

          Biden hitting NK with the “new number who dis” right after becoming president certainly doesn’t make them trust us more. And thus they have been pushed further into the arms of Russia.

          The classic American imperialists refuse to accept that by sanctioning a country into oblivion they will now just join China and Russia’s side. They have alternative options.

          Most Americans don’t even know why North Korea is so hostile. We bombed them into oblivion during the Korean war.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            Well yes because America had been pushing North Korea away.

            The classic American imperialists refuse to accept that by sanctioning a country into oblivion they will now just join China and Russia’s side.

            Most Americans don’t even know why North Korea is so hostile. We bombed them into oblivion during the Korean war.

            What the fuck is this revisionist history?

            North Korea invaded South Korea in 1950, after the South refused Northern rule. The UN stepped in (90% American forces) pushing the North Koreans nearly to China’s borders, at which point China entered the war, and resulting in the 38th parallel armistice border we have today.

            North Korea wasn’t pushed into China’s welcoming arms due to American anti-nuclear proliferation sanctions of the last twenty years, and “being bombed into oblivion” is often the result of picking on countries with bigger allies than you, just ask Germany and Japan.

            China has propped up the Kim dictatorship dynasty for the last 70 years, feeding their starving masses while the Kims focus the country’s resources on military spending, including nuclear development to substantiate their annual saber rattling. Allowing China to maintain a buffer state, that’s kept the West at bay since 1951.

      • Optional
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        To be fair, the orange rapist found some good speed on that trip

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I hate this dunk because it’s clearly shown in the original video that the DPRK officer saluted Trump first. The president salutes like fifty Marines every single day, it’s not strange for him to reflexively salute someone else without thinking about it.

          • Saik0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Eh, in Trump’s case it was best to be running in autopilot… His tweets were him “thinking”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            It was a diplomatic meeting, what were they gonna do? Kidnap the president of the united states?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            If I were President, and I were meeting with an enemy face to face, and they saluted me, I’d salute them back.

            I have not served in any military and am not aware of the official meaning of a salute.

            But I have had enemies and if I were meeting with one of my enemies and they saluted me, I would salute them.

            This is just based on my gut feel of the gesture’s meaning from watching movies. My gut feel is it’s a combination of:

            • This handshake indicates we’re both listening intently and ready to talk
            • I see you. We are the same despite our ranks, because we’ve both put ourselves here, and because we’re both equally susceptible to bullets.

            I could be wrong, and I’m asking for correction if I am, but based on that I’d salute an enemy soldier if he was standing there ready to meet with me.

            Thing is though, with a politician it’s different. I don’t know if Trump’s ever been shot at. Probably not. So the “hello, spiritual brother” thing that can apply to any other soldier even enemy is less there with a politician.

            I don’t know. Just saying it seems natural to me to salute an enemy. Like “this sucks, maybe we can end it today” feeling to it for me. Framing the war as a problem they’re facing together.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            My point is that if you see people salute you and you salute them back, do it enough times and it will become a reflex. The response to Obama bowing to someone in a culture where bowing is totally normal was equally stupid, but it was conservatives doing it instead of liberals.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 year ago

    These guys will have a better time in Ukrainian captivity than 99% of the population at home…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      According to Russian propaganda Ukraine has been doing just that the entire time, but if it actually happened that would be yet another red line to cross.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      691 year ago

      I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the US announced it would lift the ban on American contractors going to Ukraine at the same time as this. Russia reaps what it sows. Ukraine gets highly payed and skilled contractors, in return, Russia gets malnourished and untrained Korean conscripts.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        The best tactic Ukraine could have at this point would just be to encourage the North Koreans to defect. Can’t imagine it’ll be particularly difficult, “hey switch sides and we won’t kill you, and here’s a free house with electricity, water and indoor plumbing”.

        It would be like trying to convince people to leave the 15th century.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          … “and don’t worry about your family back home in North Korea who will be compressed into tinned meal”.

          The defection rate will be low I suspect. It’s an automatic TFK (total family kill) to defect and I doubt they’ll send anyone who don’t have family at home in Glorious Motherland!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        The North Koreans are perfect for the Russian tactic of forcing the Ukrainians to deplete their ammo by throwing meat at them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I wonder if many will even fight? If I were from North Korea, I’d consider surrender to be a godsend. They would do terrible things to the family members, though… I guess that’s the true cruelty of regimes like this. They punish the people you love.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I dont think it’s quite the same thing though. US contractors won’t be fighting, I think they’ll just be maintaining and repairing equipment.

        • acargitz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          231 year ago

          Arguably, a much more critical job for a capital-intensive army.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            171 year ago

            Yes, it’s actually huge. Especially for maintaining a weapon as complicated as an Abrams tank. If it can be repaired close to the front lines then that has the potential to cut days off the turnaround time compared to towing it over to Poland.

            • Echo Dot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I will never understand why the American military think it’s a good idea to send them tanks that are so complicated. Especially when they’re going up against cold war era relics.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Russia gets malnourished and untrained Korean conscripts.

        Just offer them all plane tickets to South Korea. Problem solved.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    371 year ago

    Not a single one of those support troops has any combat experience.

    So good luck, guys.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    631 year ago

    Time to translate those surrender instruction leaflets to Korean. Maybe go ahead and plan to build a large camp for malnourished people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Maybe go ahead and plan to build a large camp for malnourished people.

      Or just invite the South Korean government to send agents to Ukraine to invite them all to South Korea.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Maybe that’s the tactic, force Ukraine to divert food and resources to feeding thousands of Korean deserters.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Ukrain is a country of 40 million people, with millions already internally displaced from the war. A few thousand extra refugees wouldnt even be noticed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    In response to that Pyongyang announced early this week that it will be sending troops in the form of a military engineering unit to support Russian forces on the ground in the Donetsk region. The troops are expected to arrive on the battlefield as soon as next month.

    One engineering unit isn’t much, but perhaps there is more to come. It didn’t say anything in the article about future commitments.

    Ilya Ponomarev, a former Russian member of parliament told the UK’s Daily Express that North Korea has become an important bridge between the Kremlin and China. Beijing can indirectly transfer military equipment to Moscow through Pyongyang without falling foul of Western sanctions.

    As he explained: “North Korea is one of key Russian partners and the meaning of the rationale behind them becoming such a partner is because they are acting as a bridge between China and Russia.

    “Essentially all the military equipment that is delivered from North Korea was developed for the North Koreans by the Chinese.

    Perhaps this is less about North Korea then it appears on the surface. I wonder what Russia is giving China for this help?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    Funny thing is the eventual survivor won’t be brought back to NK after having seen the lavish lifes the russians live…

  • Eww
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 year ago

    Curious how many will defect once outside North Korea.

    • JohnEdwa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Very few, as North Korea hand picks everyone who gets to leave by essentially keeping their entire family hostage, and any “traitor family” will find them sentenced to life in prison/labour camp - including any children born in those camps.

      And they are places you wouldn’t wish for anyone to end up in, especially your loved ones.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      261 year ago

      According to hexbear you would have to have some deranged lib mind to believe any would want to.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Those children are completely delusional. I saw a thread about why the entire country is unlit at night which was a parody of itself. I wonder what their demographics are, if not 100% bots.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Surprisingly a lot of them on the Lemmy communities are also trans.

          I’m not sure they’re aware how LGBT people are treated in those countries. Either that or just willful ignorance I guess

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        NKers are simultaneously brainwashed morons who follow their leader with fanatical delusion and utterly naive children who can be lured to defection by a few pieces of candy and a charming smile.

        The hexbears are too stupid to realize that all Koreans yearn for the unlimited freedom of their Southern neighbors and yet too wicked to believe the unvarnished truths of such media luminaries as Yeomni Park. They should all be sent to North Korea to eat grass and toil in the mines and get beaten to a pulp by Kim’s totalitarian police, then repatriated so that they can apologize for their ignorant beliefs.

        • [email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          We defederated them a while ago over here. Along with some right wing instances too. The extremists from either side of the political spectrum really spoil the experience.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Maybe on account of the communities I subscribe to, but I’ve personally not come across right wing extremism on Lemmy. The tankies, though … so prevalent. Anyways, by server blocking hexbear it’s reduced by 90%.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Most of the ones that do end up regretting it /shrug

        This is wrong - it’s not that they end up regretting it so much as most of them never want to go to South Korea in the first place.

        • AbsentBird
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          About 18% of North Korean defectors regret it.

          The number one reason is wanting to see family and friends who are still trapped in North Korea.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The 18% figure is a biased sample from an anti-DPRK NGO. More comprehensive research into North Korean defectors by Cho Cheon-hyeon for his book Defectors indicate that most North Korean defectors simply want to make money in China, with only about 40% of defectors wanting to go to South Korea.

            So I did misremember, but my point still stands on the fact that most of them don’t want to defect to South Korea, even before taking into account that even at their 2009 peak defectors were a tiny fraction of a percent of North Korea’s population and the existence of them in no way implicates all of North Korean society in secretly wanting to escape.

            • AbsentBird
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              If so few people want to leave, why are so many resources directed into preventing people from leaving? I can’t think of any other country that works so hard to keep their citizens from escaping. Usually the largest barrier to leaving a country is the policies of the country you’re entering.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                The fact they’re called defectors says it all. Anywhere else they’d be called emigrants.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              That last statement is meaningless given the crazy levels of security they have on keeping people in. If they took away all the restrictions on leaving then the numbers would go through the roof.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            About 18% of North Korean defectors regret it.

            Around 20% of defectors have considered returning to North Korea. But that has less to do with the appeal of the North than the poor treatment of expats in the South.

            The South Korean immigration and labor laws make finding work south of the border incredibly difficult. North Korean expats are confined to menial service sector and grueling industrial work while being largely cut out of South Korean social life due to heavy stigmas against them. Its an incredibly hard life and not remotely like the glamorous existence of social elites that Americans claim drive the periodic defections.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              They need access to a better place. I suppose they just get financially stuck in S Korea? Or do the move on to other countries too, more willing to give them a chance?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                North Korean expats are functionally stateless, so it is very difficult to leave South Korea even when they do have money.

                The largest portion of the Korean diaspora live in China and Russia.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  Why don’t we have a law for North Korea like the Cuban Adjustment Act that allows anyone who makes it out of the country to quickly become a permanent resident, without regard for how they got out of their country. The situation seems fairly similar, where encouraging more defectors makes the target country look bad, and it can deprive them of workers.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Is it difficult because airlines and whatnot won’t carry them, or because the receiving country won’t let them immigrate due to being “stateless”?

                  Are they stateless in a way someone coming from Bolivia to the US isn’t, because NK’s outside of some globally-recognized state system? I’ve never considered this before.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    So does that mean that NATO can also start deploying troops there? I mean, so far we’ve kept out to not escalate this, but if actual foreign troops will set foot on that front line, you can only wait so long for the other side to do the same…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, because Ukraine is not a NATO member because they cannot join while already at war. If the USA got involved directly then the international community in the UN and even NATO itself would have mixed responses, perhaps even leading to NATO withdrawals and economic sanctions.

      However, the USA have started allowing private mercenary companies to participate directly in the conflict, and they’ve had indirect support specialists from the US Military in the region for a long time.

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        You’re right, but I meant it more sarcastically. Russia started the conflict and is escalating it at every turn that it can, hoping the west will back down and too ma y times we have. I’m pretty sure that the backing down is just about over by now, though

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It is not yet, but NK is already supplying the artillery which is much more valuable than men to Russia and Korea will surely respond by suppling Ukraine.