• Transporter Room 3
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        They tend not to care so much about “how safely the hazardous material is stored”

        Just ask anyone who’s tried to smuggle on 5lbs of mercury…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          191 year ago

          Nah, that’s because five pounds would be about 6 fluid ounces of mercury and you’re only allowed 3 ounces of a fluid.

          • Transporter Room 3
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            Hey now, no need to bring math into this like a civilized person! You changed the outcome by measuring it!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      If they don’t then you can call them xenophobes for not respecting Sangheili tradition to carry an Energy Sword at all times

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For the lazy:

      Ice

      Carry On Bags: Yes (Special Instructions)

      Checked Bags: Yes

      Frozen liquid items are allowed through the checkpoint as long as they are frozen solid when presented for screening. If frozen liquid items are partially melted, slushy, or have any liquid at the bottom of the container, they must meet 3-1-1 liquids requirements

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        You forgot the most important part:

        The final decision rests with the TSA officer on whether an item is allowed through the checkpoint.

      • Aviandelight
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        I would imagine that this is for transportation of medicine that needs to be kept cold like insulin?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          It is probably intended for ice packs for things like insulin, but worded vaguely to allow ice in a ziplock bag or a frozen water bottle in place of an ice pack. Most of these rules would benefit massively from stating the purpose of the rule too.

    • jlow (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Is there a reasoning for this? The whole liquid thing has to do something with explosives?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1811 year ago

      Big caveat

      The final decision rests with the TSA officer on whether an item is allowed through the checkpoint.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        And it’s not the type of crowd that will take a ‘technically correct’ in good sport.

      • Hegar
        link
        fedilink
        136
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah yes, the “rules only apply when I say they do” rule. Much legitimate.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          I mean sure, but it theoretically stops people arguing and threatening to try and bring stuff they shouldn’t really be bringing through, as being able to point at that will end a lot of arguments… Equally though, it makes a lot of sense as otherwise you’d have “ah yes this bomb isn’t banned because I’ve switched out a molecule in the explosive for an analogue”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            101 year ago

            If there is a list of acceptable things, then those specific things are not things they “shouldn’t be bringing on”.

          • Hegar
            link
            fedilink
            26
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t think they need to make the enforcement of rules ultimately arbitrary to prevent explosives. You already can’t bring explosives. The molecules involved are not relevant.

            • Ziglin (it/they)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              The mollecular structure isn’t the only thing relevant for bombs.

              You could make a bomb out of a pressurized material that you can quickly get to expand, I think that technically isn’t an explosive.

              I get your point but I also think having a catch all is good to prevent things that could otherwise get through by technicality.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            What actually happens is that some random power tripping TSA agent decides to annoy the fuck out of people he doesn’t like, and when challenged he is protected by this rule.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          Inconsistent enforcement of “the rules” is the most common form of systematic marginalization.

          It’s also easy of centrists to excuse, since it could happen to anyone, even when the statistic show to it is overwhelmingly correlated with some protected trait.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        231 year ago

        See, flying isn’t for people who plan. It’s for people who roll 20s and not 1s. You know, lucky people. That’s the message here.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    761 year ago

    I’ve actually done this successfully. TSA agent knocked on it, and said no problem.

    If i somehow would be stopped, I’d love to argue what is liquid or not, and what could be liquid if it’s just hot enough.

  • RBG
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1241 year ago

    The longer they discuss the less it is allowed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 year ago

      Yup, TSA is on the same level as McDonald’s. You’re arguing with a dipshit who hates you.

      • RBG
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        …because the ice melts, haha. Oh. You meant something else, right.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Huh, I’d have to fly from an airport with outdated scanners LIKE A PEASANT. The ones near me all let you keep your water and leave the laptop in the bag.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      I’ve done it before, it does. Though you could get an employee who doesn’t know this, or won’t accept it anyway.

    • TheRealKuni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Last two times I flew I brought a metal water bottle (Hydroflask knockoff) filled with ice cubes. Went through fine. Then I added water at a fountain after security and during the flight I got to have that ice-cold water experience I crave.

    • Sippy Cup
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      On my last trip I had a full water bottle with me and the lady said I had to throw it away, so I looked her dead in the eye while I chugged the entire bottle and stuffed the bottle in my bag.

      Fuckin tell me I can’t bring the water through again.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        I wouldn’t drink tap water outside of continental Europe. Maybe the original OP is simply in a third world country like the US.

        • Hegar
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The tap water in Canberra, Australia is the tastiest I’ve tried out of the ~20-50 municipalities I’ve sampled in Australia, Western and Southern Europe, the US, China, Taiwan and Vietnam.

          Also the US is not a third world nation, it’s a developing nation. Or under-developed would be more accurate, but that’s not a popular term. The US is a first world nation by definition, since first world just means the US global empire and it’s allies.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The US has pretty good tap water in most places. Of course there are outliers we are talking about a giant country.

          While you are right to trust most tap water in Europe we also have a lot of outliers. Old plumbing being probably the biggest problem. But also the taste can be atrocious. The worst tasting tap water I ever needed to drink was in Barcelona.

          Edit: and the worst looking tap water I ever saw was in Paris. (It was old pipes or something as it was brown, almost red)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      It throws up a false positive in the old scanners. There are new ones available that don’t have a problem but they aren’t widely available yet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      because muslims can’t drink alcohol, they drink water. The TSA is trying to stop everyone from being terrorrists by only allowing them to buy and drink alcoholic products available after the security controls at the duty free shop.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      501 year ago

      Security theater. Supposedly there’s a clear liquid explosive that someone tried to get through once. Of course, it’s bullshit, like everything else the TSA says.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    A friend has been challenged when trying to bring a nordic cheese (from Norway to France). The TSA equivalent said that it could be liquid if hot enough. Yeah… glasses too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      They didn’t want France getting wind of their cheese and declaring war on Norway for having the audacity to have non-french cheese