• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    It was designed to show off stereo sound which was still fairly new at the time. I like the way those recordings sound actually.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Think this is more an artifact of the way vinyl records worked - since audio can be encoded in two channels via the way the needle moves in certain orientations

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      19
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Urr, I don’t think that’s it. I’m not sure stereo sound for vinyls has ever worked so that something like this would be necessary, and it wouldn’t really make sense – why would they have to put vocals on one channel and instruments on the other?

      A stereo vinyl player just has the needle moving up and down in addition to left and right, so that the left-right axis is the sum of the waveforms of both channels and the up-down axis is the difference – which means that a regular mono player can play stereo vinyls

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Hm, not sure why they’d do it then - maybe just easier to keep organized with the workflow of the time?

  • the dopamine fiend
    link
    fedilink
    681 year ago

    The jump from mono to stereo made a lot of engineers’ heads spin. Then again, how many 100% perfect 5.1 albums have you heard?

    Actually, I’ve listened to only three 5.1 remixes, all of them phenomenal albums to begin with, and their 5.1 jobs were pretty meh. Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots came out pretty good, but mainly because they just fucked around and tried stuff.

    • Riley
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Brian Wilson of The Beach Boys, who produced Pet Sounds, was actually deaf in one ear. Despite that, he got along just fine in a monophonic world, but the switch to stereo completely left him behind. It was a huge change in how music was mixed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And yet Pet Sounds (and even the contemporary stuff they originally recorded for SMiLE but never officially released) still sounds phenomenal to this day despite being in mono.

        The man was a wizard.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Have you ever listened to Zaireeka appropriately? I haven’t, but that must be a headache to line up correctly.

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I thought part of the point of Zaireeka is that it is impossible to get it exact every time, so every time you play it it is a unique soundscape.

      • LucasWaffyWaf
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        It was a pain in the ass but me and a buddy got it working once. I was a young teen and this was long before weed helped me see more beauty in music, so I didn’t get much out of it, but as an adult it’d probably be different.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      It makes sense. I bet it’s super hard, especially at first.

      It’s largely a headphone problem, at least for me. I can’t listen to a song where certain tracks are completely isolated to one ear. The audio doesn’t need to be mixed perfectly, but I need at least a little bit of each sound in each ear. Otherwise it’s too distracting. My brain hates it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        It’s supposed to sound like the band is in front of you on a stage. Not all mashed into one spot in the center of the stage. You should be able to close your eyes and picture where each drum is positioned. Where the before guitar players are standing. And you should be able to hear the shape of the room. Modern recordings mixed digitally can no longer do this. Then again if you’re streaming Spotify into Bluetooth your missing most of what’s there anyways.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      There’s some cool 5.1 and even 7.1 stuff in classical music (I don’t have a a surround sound setup myself but I hear a lot of talk of it).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      401 year ago

      I hate the “spatial” mixes.

      Sometimes they’re done really well, but most of the time it’s just putting different parts of the song in different areas and makes it sound “diluted”.

      Like, the guitar is in front of you, then the bass is behind and to the left… why??

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        You’re missing a key ingredient: Lysergic acid diethylamide.

        In all other circumstances I agree with you.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Lysergic acid diethylamide doesn’t fix a bad mix.

          You can still hear all the separate instruments surrounding you on a good regular mix, all the spatial does is break the interwoven sound.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Lysergic acid diethylamide doesn’t fix a bad mix.

            I mean… Have you ever listened to “Whole Lotta Love” or “Axis: Bold as Love” while tripping balls? Those panning parts are pretty wild.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        My understanding is that most (at least rock) music is mixed this way, just subtle enough to help your brain pick out instruments but not enough to consciously notice.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Music is mixed that way, but spatial then takes a hammer to that concept.

          It takes away the single interwoven sound and imo sounds like different tracks being played on opposite sides of the room.

          I usually try the atmos mix for an album if it’s available on tidal, and usually all it ever does is remove the punch from songs.

  • gid
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    You know, I love those albums where they fucked around did things like hard-pan all the drums to the right channel. I’m here for the experimentation.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    Today’s music is digitally mixed on laptops and has zero dynamic range or feeling. Then again people listen on Bluetooth now so they are only getting 20% of the music anyways. Makes me very sad

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      2024 I finally tried some Bluetooth headphones after maybe 10+ years.

      Still using SBC by default, still no duplex HD audio, and still static driver noise at idle.

      What is even the point lol. SBC-XQ only solves the first problem which is still inferior to even the cheapest of quality 3.5mm cable.

      Even my Nintendo DS sounds better and it’s limited to 32Khz audio lol.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Jeez, were one of the two devices 10 years old? That hasn’t been my experience for a long time (except the duplex audio issue. I can’t believe it’s still terrible.)

        Then again, I mostly use BT for the convenience. Being able to do yard work with zero wires is amazing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It does what it claims to do in that it makes the music sound like it’s coming from a set of speakers a few feet in front of you in a room that has poor sound deadening. I really tried to like it but it just sounds more muddled/is fatiguing for me.

      Edit: I haven’t tried it on acid yet tho, maybe that would make it make sense.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    My dad had some albums, maybe Mike Oldfield or others…there was a train going through a station, and hearing it pass from left to right in stereo was amazing at the time

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Incredible. I’m learning a ton and gaining a huge appreciation of it all thanks to everyone’s comments in this post.

      • TXL
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        That’s what good link aggregators are for.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I think it was to reduce distortion on mono records when played back with a stereo stylus. I could be wrong though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    52
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This would be more early 60’s, mostly because those engineers were working with 2 track stereo which really limits your options. Most artists were recording on at least 8 track stereo by the 70’s.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Beatles albums prior to… I want to say The White Album? Or it might have been Sgt. Pepper/Magical Mystery Tour, were recorded in mono and originally released in mono. “Stereo” versions were released (“Fake stereo” AKA recording in mono and panning it to one side or another) which are the ones that sound kinda bad imo. They were never intended to be listened in stereo other than as a novelty.

            It wasn’t until their later albums were they actually meant to be listened to in stereo. Eleanor Rigby, being on Revolver, was not recorded with “real” stereo mixing in mind as far as I understand it. If you’re listening to the 2009 Stereo Remasters (the Box Set versions), then they were properly mixed into stereo, and sound pretty good. However, the original experience was always meant to be mono.

            Though I’m sure there’s some expert on this shit that knows more than me.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              I have all of the remasters, but it’s the newer mixes that really do a great job with stereo. I love the Beatles. :) The Giles Martin mixes really are awesome. I hope he gets to all of them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I noticed that I had blown the front left speaker in my first car when bohemian rhapsody was missing vocals. I don’t remember when “a night at the opera” came out, but I’m going to be bold and say the 70s.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I believe that they had stereo mixing pretty figured out by the 70s…

    Early-mid 60s though? Sure.

    Unless you’re referring to when they started mixing mono albums into stereo, then yeah. Those albums were never meant to be listened in stereo, and I wouldn’t listen to a remaster of any of them unless they were officially approved by the band, or done by the band’s own producer. And even then…

  • the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    One of the worst abuses of stereo in my opinion are old Beatles albums. Maybe cuz the tech was somewhat new they were playing far too much? Too much for me anyway

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      It’s like motion controls. Nintendo came out with the Wii, motion controls were a huge goddamn fad for a few years, and now 2 of the 3 main console manufacturers put a gyro in their controllers which might be used for fine aiming control and that’s about it.

  • Orbituary
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    There’s actually a biological reason for this, believe it or not. Language and music “time share” many characteristics of both hemispheres of the brain. Language and music are processed in different hemispheres.

    Read pages 20-26 of the book “How Music Really Works” by Wayne Chase. It breaks it down in detail.