• adr1anM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I wonder if this could help the IT workers from the public sector in Germany (E12, around 2500 €/month).

    Anyone knows why it is like that?

    Once, I heard about some speculative extra amounts made by guarantees in purchases. (Germans love guarantees, and any hardware purchase has a 50% surplus that can easily be split 1:1 between vendor and whoever was in charge. Yes, it would be illegal… But nearly impossible to prove.)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      E12 starts at 4.170,32 € gross and up to rises 6.516,74 € depending on experience. That is gross. That is for a job, which is low stress and you can not be fired unless you pretty much commit a crime on the workplace.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I work in the Dutch public sector in IT, but with a few years of experience, I’m already beyond 4k/mo.

      Sounds like the union isn’t pulling it’s weight…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          Those jobs exist, and are hiring. My company (US-based, Software, between 1k and 10k employees) is hiring architects in Germany (anywhere, 100% remote) for significantly over 4k net. Starting salary is over 100k, plus a nice RSU package (4 year vest with 1 year cliff). Other similar companies offer comparable compensation packages.

          We do require a quite wide tech knowledge and good communication (customer interaction is part of the job, sometimes public speaking). It is not as relaxed as public sector, tho, most weeks are over 40h. Some traveling required, too.

          If anyone is interested feel free to ping me (full disclosure: Iget a 5k USD referral bonus if you get hired and pass the Probezeit).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            010 months ago

            Got the knowledge I think, but not the spunk for the hours. You wouldn’t hire 4 days a week would you :-) ?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              010 months ago

              Feel free to pm me if you have any questions :)

              Something I forgot to add above: since the position requires speaking with customers, most countries require fluent local language (apparently with the exception of Scandinavia).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    110 months ago

    Here in Washington State it has had some effect. At my work, we had many people leave because their salary wasn’t on the high side of the range even though they were more senior. We also had hiccups in hiring because candidates come in asking for the high end salary but then their experience is abysmal to say the least. But then you train this person for 2 or 3 years for them to actually be of any use, and they leave because now they got something to chase a higher salary with. A small company can’t afford to raise salaries all the time, specially if it’s for people who are in training and don’t even know it. Anyway, to give you a clue, if you fuck up like 5 times and nobody gives a shit, you’re still in training. However, if you think you’re gonna fuck up and upper management call a meeting to discuss the status, then you should probably ask for a raise.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    110 months ago

    Only the salary ranges for a position become public. They aren’t going to publish what they pay each employee.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      And if it’s anything like California the ranges will be useless. My salary “range” is quoted as $80k - $170k. Real fucking useless.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29 months ago

    Article 9.5 of this directive leaves the door open for each country to decide whether or not to require companies with fewer than 100 employees […] to publish this information.