• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Making water into wine was not something all that special, it used to basically be like a concentrate that you would then add to water to consume. Shoutout to the history of Rome podcast. So he could make more and more deluted wine with more water but it wouldn’t become more concentrated.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    10810 months ago

    Water + Jesus = Wine

    Wine + Jesus = Brandy

    Brandy + Jesus = Twice-distilled Brandy? Cooking sherry? Idk

    • Billiam
      link
      fedilink
      5010 months ago

      I choose to believe at this point, Jesus got so drunk he forgot to try it a third time.

      • metaStatic
        link
        fedilink
        4210 months ago

        Is this really the blood of Christ? Man that guy must have been wasted 24/7

        • Billiam
          link
          fedilink
          610 months ago

          He’s 30 years old, still lived with his parents, and spent all day hanging out with his twelve dude bros in a time before XBox existed.

          Of course he was fucking hammered all day.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    310 months ago

    I think he ended up being Rasputin and invented vodka

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    910 months ago

    If he indeed turned water into wine and made all things, why would he need to recurse as if he can’t get it right the first time?

    • Flax
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The question isn’t why but if. Also how do we know that He didn’t?

  • oce 🐆
    link
    fedilink
    510 months ago

    You just have to find another bodily fluid with the same color as the target alcohol.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    "And on the third day, there was a wedding in Cana. Jesus’ mother was there. When the wine was drunk, Jesus’ mother said to him, ‘We’re out of wine.’ ‘Bruh… That’s a big yikes. But why do I care?’, replied Jesus.

    Jesus mother instructed the servants, ‘you just do whatever he tells you no matter how stupid it sounds.’ Jesus sighed and turned to the servants saying, ’ Okay. You see those jars? Nope. Not that one. The big ones. Yeah. Those big ones over there. Go fill them up with water. All the way up. Then take some of the water and give it to the host."

    The servants were more than a little skeptical but shrugged and did as they were told. When the host of the wedding feast tasted the water, it had become wine. And the host exclaimed, “Damn! That is some good shit. Where did you get that from?” And the servants were amazed because they knew from where the wine came.

    And the servants implored Jesus, 'Do it again! No, wait. Can you make something stronger this time?"

    – The Gospel According to [Skibidi] John

    • Flax
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 months ago

      Is this that gen z bible paraphrase

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        I mean, given that Jesús would not only be a brown hippie moonshiner, but also probably a damn Mexican furriner to boot, he’d be lucky if they didn’t lay siege to the whole neighborhood, Waco-style.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          310 months ago

          In the Bible they wanted to kill him many times but he always slipped away. He wasn’t arrested until he gave himself to the authorities. The ATF wouldn’t catch him if he didn’t want to be caught. But I’m sure they’d destroy lots of people, animals and property regardless.

    • FreshLight
      link
      fedilink
      910 months ago

      Can he create a stone that is not liftable and then proceed to lift it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Unironically the question by witch many Christian faiths differ: does God needs abide to the rules of logic or not?

        For the Roman Catholic, yes, for Calvinists and a bunch other (ok, many other but I’m not an expert), no.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          Calvanists the ones that say since god is all powerful there can be no free will/everything is decided don’t apply logic?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            That’s the one, funnily enough in a perverted twist, they tend to see wealth as a sign that God has picked them as favourites (graced them) and they storically gravitated toward seeing poor people as, well, sinners, even thought their principles state that anyone could be graced or not no matter the more evident aspects of life.

            • Flax
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              This isn’t Calvinism. This is prosperity theology, which is it’s own thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          Ah theologians. When we invented agriculture so that not everyone had to work on gathering food, this enabled some of us to specialize in advanced skills. But theology, wow. What a waste of time. Get those dudes out in the fields.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1210 months ago

          Answer: whatever causes the person you’re arguing with to throw their hands up and storm off more exasperated…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            No, not really, it’s mostly a matter of power.

            The Church itself is rooted in the idea that there are autorities on matter of faith and they adopted the Platonical Agostinean idea that faith is empowered by reason. Reason being a valid tool means you have experts that reasoned a lot about religion and people that know less and needs to be taught, ultimately by the Pope.

            The “other” side tends to reject authorities, and take the words of the bible as sobjected to personal interpretation or, to an extent, make it into some sort of magical object that the faithfull subjects itself to, without questions. Accepting the contradictions, the illogal parts, are what that kind of faith is about because to question (throught reasoning) God is a Sin.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1210 months ago

        The easiest answer to this is yes, he could create a stone he couldn’t lift. And then he could lift it anyway.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              What false negative? If he can lift it then he didn’t create a stone he can’t lift. Can he make one plus one equal anything other than two?

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Well Jesus, yes. Because Jesus let Himself die as well.

    • Match!!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      I interpreted this as “having the basic ability to take as actions would allow you to do this”, which is also true, I can ferment wine and then gradually make it more concentrated

  • Queen HawlSera
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    210 months ago

    Pretty much, and for anyone wondering if God could create a rock he couldn’t lift…

    The answer is still yes, and he is then unable to lift the rock, but able to remove the limitation preventing him from lifting the rock at any time.

    • Flax
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 months ago

      Kinda like how He let Himself be dead and then removed the limitation by rising again

      • Queen HawlSera
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Correct, he’s God, he can do anyhting in any amount of time and we can perceive it however he chooses.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    710 months ago

    Late one evening a boy and his father were accosted by a mugger. The traumatic moment unlocked some kind of latent power within the boy. Frantically he tried to intervene, skin touched skin, and the assailant’s blood turned to wine, fatal. But not before the cretin dealt a terminal blow to the father. And that night that boy became the hero we all know, Jesus Christ.