• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    36
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It’s great how people are gathering and having discussions under heavily censored platforms owned by billionaries, just amazing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      And on top of that, pretty much all the platforms, even all the way down to this one, are censored in at least one increasingly-relevant way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      308 months ago

      All tech companies eventually enshitify and we would never be able to remember all of them if they all became slurs. Lol

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    368 months ago

    OK, so people can use the definition instead. In fact it might be more useful.

    • just another dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      I’m still not sure what it means, judging by the comments here it (murderer / terrorist etc) it does seem to be used as a slur. So yeah, using the definition instead would be useful.

        • just another dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I just told you I I’m not sure of the definition, so asking me what I think it means is pointless. Though I’m pretty sure it’s not a group you can join like ISIS, right?

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          They’re saying that in the same way terrorist is not always a slur but is used as a slur sometimes, Zionist can be used as a slur. I think it’s a fair take. It’s odd to specifically list Zionist as a contextual slur when you can just say no slurs.

          I don’t know if I fully agree but that’s their argument as I understand it.

          Edit: Idk why people are down voting me trying to explain someone’s argument.

            • JackbyDev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              If you do something like refer to all white people or all Germans as Nazis then yeah, in that context it’s a slur. But just referring to members of the Nazi party, definitely not. Extreme far right folks, personally no, I don’t view it as a slur there. Some people may disagree (probably the extreme far right people being called Nazis).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            118 months ago

            If you refer to the Muslim man in the bomb vest as a terrorist its fine, if you refer to all muslim men as terrorists its a slur.

            Refering to Israeli generals and politicians as Zionists is fine, If you refer to all Jewish people as Zionists…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              48 months ago

              Nobody is referring as all Jews as zionists. Actually it’s zionists and Israel defender who want you to believe that anti zionism is anti Judaism

            • just another dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              78 months ago

              I figured zionism had to do with an ideology, not a profession. Generalisations like these are not helping.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 months ago

                Falsehood is fruitless from the start so don’t worry, Truth always prevails as they say

                • just another dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  18 months ago

                  Meanwhile, nobody has attempted to give a definition. Lots of downvotes all around though. 🤷🏼‍♀️

  • InfiniteGlitch
    link
    fedilink
    288 months ago

    Twitch has become garbage anyway. I’m more on Kick for streams nowadays.

    Anyway wasn’t “Zionist” suppose to be a good term for these murderers? Whether they make it a banable word, screw them. Those who defend Israel, their genocidal actions and claim that the land “belongs to them, the colonizers” are Zionists.

    • dinckel
      link
      fedilink
      138 months ago

      Twitch is garbage, so you moved to a platform ran by a gambling company, where rules practically don’t exist, and the majority of the userbase is vehemently sexist and racist? That’s a level of mental gymnastics I genuinely will never understand

    • zqps
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Even technologically Twitch has always been shit. For all the hate YT rightfully deserves, I’m kinda glad they just said “ok we do livestreaming now too” one day and it works so much better. Simply so I never have to use twitch ever again.

      • InfiniteGlitch
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        The issue with YouTube is, I don’t see many people on it to Stream (or I just don’t look in the right direction?). I barely to not use Twitch these days, sometimes Kick but that’s about it.

  • ceoofanarchism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1088 months ago

    Hey everybody has a right to a racist ethnostate how dare people criticize the idea.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      From the link of this post that you could have clicked on:

      Twitch specifies this is conditional: you’re allowed to discuss the political movement of that name, but not “attack or demean another individual or group of people on the basis of their background or religious belief.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        308 months ago

        but not “attack or demean another individual or group of people on the basis of their background or religious belief.”

        Yeah, how dare people try to demean someone just because they checks notes hold dehumanizing beliefs and support a government and movement bent on removing the people from their land so they can steal it and build new homes while ethnically cleansing the existing population.

        smh my head.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      68 months ago

      One of the orchestrators of this whole thing, Destiny, defends child porn and the use of slurs.

      Ironic is putting it lightly.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Calling zionism what it is shouldn’t be discouraged with dog whistles masquerading as conduct policies.

    At the same time I’d like to remind folks that not all Jewish people subscribe to Zionism.

    There are a couple Jewish lead organizations that fight for the freedom of Palestine and have been very critical of Israel for many years.

    Jewish Voices for Peace is one group. I wonder how they’d feel about Twitches new policy. I’m genuinely curious what their opinion would be.

    Edit - corrected Jewish Voices for Peace

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      If you had looked at the link of this post, you would have read:

      Twitch specifies this is conditional: you’re allowed to discuss the political movement of that name, but not “attack or demean another individual or group of people on the basis of their background or religious belief.”

      I.e. nothing is masqueraded here as long as they keep to this. This seems to be a reasonable policy. I’ve seen a couple of instances of people being derogatorily called zionists just for supporting the people of current Israel not being pushed away out of their now decades-old homes, which is hard to still call Zionist if they don’t support any further expansion and any offensive military action.

      There’s almost never anything gained to use “Zionist” on someone as if saying “asshole”.

      • Anas
        link
        fedilink
        188 months ago

        Twitch specifies this is conditional: you’re allowed to discuss the political movement of that name, but not “attack or demean another individual or group of people on the basis of their background or religious belief.”

        Zionist is a political term, it has nothing to do with one’s background or religious belief.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          You’re entirely right.

          But see if the political view is only held by members or a certain religious group (even if not all members of said religion accept said political thought), it’s easy to conflate it, so that you can ban anyone opposing said political thought based on “they’re discriminating against me because of my religion”.

          Fuck twitch.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          58 months ago

          I identify myself as a homosexual.

          I’ve heard homo being used in a derogatory way as an insult. That usage should not be tolerated.

          Retarded is just a medical term, yet you can use it as an insult as well.

          That is what this “specification of conditional” aims at. It’s fine to use the word in a descriptive way, you’re just not allowed to go around angrily calling people “fucking zionist”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        158 months ago

        which is hard to still call Zionist if they don’t support any further expansion and any offensive military action.

        Your ‘if’ is doing a lot of heavy lifting. And is fucking hilarious given they keep expanding and pushing people out of their decades old homes.

        Funny how that part seems to be ignored in defense of zionists…

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          78 months ago

          say what you say about state of Israel but they got AIPAC to run propaganda of the history!

          being able to mobilize foreign population to support your genocide really is the psyop of all times lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        98 months ago

        I guess my pessimistic lens is a little strong and I generally don’t trust large companies to act in good faith. So maybe I’m over scrutinizing here and being a bit of a curmudgeon.

        I think your perspective is fair, and it’s likely this is akin to a high school faculty dealing with some random word or idea becoming a meme of sorts and causing problems. So they have to write some new rule that sounds ridiculous or weird.

        It sucks there’s so much racism and bigotry driving forces in the world that it’s hard to not be dubious of everything. You always kinda wonder about the actual motivation behind things like this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      358 months ago

      At the same time I’d like to remind folks that not all Jewish people subscribe to Zionism.

      Further to this, the majority of zionists are christians.

      • zqps
        link
        fedilink
        78 months ago

        I know there’s a lot of Christians involved but how do we know it’s the majority? Young Israelis are raised largely around Zionist propaganda after all.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          88 months ago

          the majority of zionists are christians.

          us braindead fundies are numbered in dozens of millions and they largely support Zionism.

          in rural US, radio glorifying genocide… it is very disturbing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          128 months ago

          There’s about 100 million evangelical christians in the US, and a LifeWay poll in 2017 showed that about 80% essentially considered themselves zionists. That’s 80 million. There’s 15.8 million jews worldwide. So the non-Jewish zionists outweigh Jewish zionists by a fair margin. Heck, they outweigh the zionist and the non-zionist jews taken together by a beefy margin, even.

          • zqps
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            That’s an insane number. Must be a very broad definition of Zionist.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              oh no, statistics that challenge my world view! Quick, let’s not look into it at all and move the goal posts!

              Could you at least try to engage in this discussion? Or maybe come up with any evidence supporting your world view?

              • zqps
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                A different definition of the term isn’t a different worldview. Also, not immediately spinning every exchange into an exhaustive debate isn’t a critical character flaw. Unlike being an insufferable ass about not getting the amount of attention you apparently feel entitled to.

                Though I would take look at that poll about 80% of Christians being “essentially” Zionists if you’d link to it.