• .Donuts
    link
    fedilink
    3615 months ago

    “we have no choice but to follow Reddits guidelines”

    There’s another choice, but that would require you to look past reddit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      205 months ago

      Not that the mods are aware, but if Reddit disappeared tomorrow, I (sadly) suspect most users would go to Twitter or various Discords.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’ve thought about it as some of my niche interests have dried up on Reddit and apparently only live on Twitter now.

          And maybe Discord. It’s hard to tell because it’s closed, but I see hints of discussion spilling out into GH issues or whatever.

          I despise both for different reasons, but where else am OlI gonna go if I actually want to talk with the community?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      They even have to leave, they just have to ignore the admins and become ungovernable.

      But they won’t, because they’re cowards.

          • Blaze (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            You can for past crimes, not future crimes.

            The whole statement: https://lemmy.world/c/lemmyworld

            About the manifesto

            If it’s confirmed, I don’t see why not. Depends on the community, of course. I’m sure !lemmybewholesome would remove it.

            https://lemmy.world/comment/13922763

            On the other hand, there is [email protected] that got created recently. This thread can interest you, it talks about jury nullification: https://lemmy.world/post/22973877

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                16
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                To determine whether or not an accused individual is guilty there are two primary options in the USA. A trial before a judge who makes the decision, or a trial by a “jury of your peers” where the whole jury must agree that the individual is guilty. A jury of one’s peers means that the people selected to hear the case are selected from the general populace and have no substantial connection to the accused. For example, you wouldn’t put the person’s mother on the jury. The jurors are not required to be lawyers or experts in any field. Just average people.

                If you just wanted some people to take the facts of the case and the facts of the law and determine whether or not the accused was guilty, then you would want experts and lawyers on the jury. That’s how trials used to be hundreds of years ago. A judge, often appointed by a king, would pass sentence over the peons brought before him. Since our legal system has average everyday people as jurors, clearly they are supposed to do more than that.

                This is where jury nullification comes in. The jurors not only judge based on the facts of the case, but also on whether or not the law in question is just. If an individual is accused of a crime, and is clearly in violation of the law, the juror can still find them not guilty if the law in question is unjust. In essence, the jurors nullify the law by refusing to convict. For example, during the prohibition era, it was not unheard of for juries to return not guilty verdicts for people accused of selling or transporting alcohol. The jurors thought the laws was were wrong so they refused to convict. A much more tragic example was in the deep south where jurors would sometime refuse to convict people of lynching black people.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            !lemmyworld

            We have previously asked moderators to remove content relating to jury nullification when this was suggested in context of murder or other violent crimes. Following a discussion in our team we want to clarify that we are no longer requesting moderators to remove content relating to jury nullification in the context of violent crimes when the crime in question already happened. We will still consider suggestions of jury nullification for crimes that have not (yet) happened as advocation for violence, which is violating our terms of service.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          155 months ago

          Not true - we’re just not allowed to discuss jury nullification in the context of encouraging someone to commit a violent felony which includes the promise of absolution through jury nullification.

          Or something, idk. It was kinda weird.

          Jury nullification as two English words that can be spoken one after the other, however, is perfectly allowable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      You plant shit seeds, you get shit weeds. I hate the fact that Reddit has grown since I bailed over for API changes. It hurts my soul knowing I did the right thing and bailed but the vast majority of people who were pissed off at Reddit ended up back on the platform.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        If we just send all the offensive words into the memory hole then people will stop thinking bad thoughts about groups of people. We can erase it right out of history and everything will be better. Control the language, control the thoughts. Thanks Ministry of Truth! 🥸

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          Bruh what. I’m not trying to control anything. Just offering an objective fact that you can use how you see fit.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
          link
          fedilink
          95 months ago

          Uhh…so you know language is like, a social construct, right? As people have come to realize, “spaz” was originally used to describe people with “spastic” movements from conditions like spastic paralysis or cerebral palsy, it’s fallen out of favour.

          That’s all. No one is trying to control you or suppress your language. It’s just not a great word, and the language you choose reflects on your perceived character by others.

          That said, I’m not here trying to police your speech, speak as you will.

            • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
              link
              fedilink
              45 months ago

              You know, the first thing I do in the morning when I wake up really should not be get on Lemmy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      645 months ago

      Honestly I kinda wonder if he’s afraid for his own life. He had a lot of people calling for his head last year, and this kind of overreaction seems pretty in line with somebody who is just beside themselves with terror.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        235 months ago

        Uhh during the Exodus from reddit Spez was telling his employees to not wear reddit identifying clothing outside and to be careful when out in public as they were likely to be attacked…

        As if people complaining and stopping using your platform was already grounds to think your life was over. He’s absolutely paranoid and this likely is just straight up eating him inside since this was more real.

        This is absolutely his response and thinking that it does anything to protect himself to protect his caste.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          125 months ago

          I forgot about that! “Everyone loves us, but maybe for your safety don’t tell anyone you work here.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          95 months ago

          Uhh during the Exodus from reddit Spez was telling his employees to not wear reddit identifying clothing outside and to be careful when out in public as they were likely to be attacked…

          I’m sure he thought to himself “I’m getting so much negative feedback and hostile attention that everyone else must be experiencing the same thing… right?”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          65 months ago

          I hope he pulls an Oedipus Rex and tries so hard to avoid killing his dad and fucking his mom that he accidentally kills his dad and fucks his mom.

      • ArxCyberwolf
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        And this is the guy who said he’d be in charge and possibly owning slaves after society collapses. What an absolute clown! LMAO!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    445 months ago

    Why do people still use reddit? why do people still use twitter? why are people using bluesky thinking it’ll be different??

    • ArchRecord
      link
      fedilink
      English
      495 months ago

      It’s the network effect. It’s always the network effect.

      Your current platform enshittified. Where do you go? Well, the majority of people are going to Bluesky, and it’s familiar in terms of UI, so you go there. Sure, you could convince someone like that to try something like Mastodon, but Mastodon is comparably much smaller than Bluesky, so its intrinsic value to people is substantially lower, not to mention the fact that without an algorithm, most of these users have no clue how to curate a feed, since every platform has an algorithm now. A lot of these people will have never used an algorithm-less platform in their entire life.

      The same goes for Reddit vs. Lemmy. Reddit has much more users than Lemmy, more niche communities, higher engagement, etc. Why move somewhere that’s identical in function if it’s smaller? Your current platform works well enough.

      I think it’s easy to underestimate how much censorship and enshittification people are willing to put up with. People will put up with a lot before they switch platforms. Reddit not letting people publish a person’s manifesto isn’t gonna convince many people to abandon their entire accounts and communities and to switch to Lemmy.

      It literally took Twitter being rebranded into oblivion, and turned into an explicit safe haven for fascists and far-right freaks, with an algorithm deboosting non paid-for content multiple times over before people really started flocking out in large numbers.

      • Blaze (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        235 months ago

        I think it’s easy to underestimate how much censorship and enshittification people are willing to put up with. People will put up with a lot before they switch platforms.

        People use the Internet without an adblocker

        • Polymath
          link
          fedilink
          55 months ago

          Compare also: the people who bitch about McDonald’s, Walmart, Amazon, or similar, yet still spend money there. In many cases (not all), there’s an option to spend elsewhere, yet folks still vote with their wallet to pay into the system that f***s them.

          Capitalists don’t care about our gripes. The only language they know is profit and money

          • ArchRecord
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            To be fair, a lot of that is due to significant, meaningful pressures that prevent them from actually shopping anywhere else. Corporations that provide things with much more inelastic demand (food, home goods, etc) are harder to escape from than social media sites that nobody actually needs to, for instance, stay alive.

            For instance, Amazon’s “most favored nation” policy means that you’re literally not allowed to sell your product anywhere else for cheaper. Amazon becomes the only place where products have the lowest possible price you could afford.

            If you need to buy a given product, whether it be groceries from Amazon Fresh, or diapers for your baby, Amazon will give you the lowest price (by effectively just causing all other prices to go up), and if, like many Americans, you live paycheck to paycheck, you can’t exactly afford to switch stores.

            That isn’t true across the board of course, but it’s definitely a bit different from social media.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        One issue with alternative smaller platforms can also be them becoming cesspools of users banned from the big platform. The first couple of Reddit alternatives quickly collected the racists and jailbait porn.

        A viable alternative platform needs more than extremist niches.

        • ArchRecord
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          Too true. The first lemmy instance I signed up for shut itself down without warning within a week of me signing up because they’d accidentally federated with a CP instance and their country’s government could have ended up putting the instance’s owner in jail for it.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        A lot of these people will have never used an algorithm-less platform in their entire life.

        Drag can confirm, drag has never used a social media without algorithms. Unless talking through two cans and a string counts.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        145 months ago

        Coming to Lemmy means losing some of the really well supported niche communities from Reddit of old and that was the biggest hit of leaving, but the site being such cancer now I wonder how well they are doing anyway.

        Lemmy, once you’ve blocked 90% of the weird tankies, really does feel like Reddit from 10+ years ago in the comments. It’s just a shame due to its current small size how single minded the general feed often feels. Hopefully that improves

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15 months ago

    While I agree this is inappropriate censorship in favor of the corpos, I thought the manifesto that people were sharing was debunked as not his? I heard (from an unverified source so I don’t have evidence) that Luigi himself stated it was not his?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      There’s another one that’s longer that talks about a family member. That is the fake.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Well shucks, guys, we sure do hope y’all will understand, but any discussion of current events will be looked upon as a direct affront on our corporate overlords and their kin, and golly gee, we’d feel just plum awful if our beloved faceless and soulless owners found a reason to be cross with us! So, we know you’ll be just as soft and unquestioningly compliant as we have made up our minds to be, and that y’all will keep your dang ol’ gazes pointed at the floor and your yaps shut, and just do as you’re told, a-hyuck! Otherwise, our precious r/popculturechat might catch a whoopin’ from them powers that be, and well-shut-my-mouth, we just absolutely, positively, could not ever fucking have THAT. EVER. Could we?

    Delete your Reddit account.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      Hot take: everyone saying to avoid praising Muad’dib on lemmy.world is wrong. Telling the truth about the first folk hero in centuries is more important than the existence of lemmy.world. Letting that community be shut down by the Dutch authorities is an acceptable sacrifice.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    605 months ago

    The fact that so many social media sites have to restrict this sort of thing just goes to show what most people think about this situation. So satisfying to watch.

    • granolabar
      link
      fedilink
      345 months ago

      To check who rules you, check who you can’t criticize.

      This ol’ reliable always works

        • Dragon Rider (drag)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          Hold on, let’s test that hypothesis

          Those kids with blood cancer deserved it!

          Now let’s see how many downvotes this comment gets. If it gets heavily downvoted, then all hail our leukemic overlords.

        • granolabar
          link
          fedilink
          85 months ago

          well damn, did not realize that dead ceos and insurance company owners are now equivalent of “sick kids” within the US power structure.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      115 months ago

      This absolutely the right lesson to learn here. Who cares if you can’t discuss it (not literally)? We already know the American people agree. We now need to take the next step to unify the working class and organize so we can coordinate our efforts and exercise actual political power

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    26
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Yup. They permabanned me for saying I didn’t care when Trump said Liz Cheney should be shot, since she’s called for bombing millions of people.

    So it’s not just calling for violence that’s bannable. Now apathy for violence against the rich is a bannable offense. Smells like panic to me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      I was perma banned for highlighting Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher should be denied the chance to move to Europe to escape Trump. Given they have deep links to PDiddy. A nothing comment, jumped on by emotionally unstable mods. It’s the same on most of the subreddits. If you don’t agree with their perspective, you lose.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    245 months ago

    I was just about to ask why the fuck anyone would give a shit about what happens over on reddit, then I noticed the sub. Let that shit hole die and crumble into obscurity already. We moved to our own place for a reason. Fuck ‘em feed ‘em fish heads.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        i’m not turning it into a circlejerk. I am stating that the censorship on reddit has gone too far and also the community is not aligned with my interests. That’s all there is too it.

    • granolabar
      link
      fedilink
      95 months ago

      They are all about do it and we have censorship here too… but fedi is the future.

      Hopefully we get an influx of fresh meat

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        85 months ago

        well it depends on if i agree with it or not. i got banned from /r/worldnews for saying the word “nakba”

        • granolabar
          link
          fedilink
          55 months ago

          it is modded by jews who pretend to not be Zionists because they said one time:

          Israel bad, mmmkay

          One time, their actions speak for themselves on the Gaza genocide topic.

          Coupled with their behavior regarding a dead parasite Brian Thompson.

          I think we can tell whose team they play for.

          Beauty of fedi, this can be documented for them to be exposed. We do need a proper News sub with proper moderation and heavy traffic.

          They slid into that slop and are abusing their mod status to drive elite friendly narratives.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            65 months ago

            Yeah most of the news on the conflict is very one sided, and if anyone mentions anything about palastine, its downvoted to hell or removed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    265 months ago

    We’re brainwashed to believe in “free speech” so we don’t notice that it doesn’t exist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      135 months ago

      I mean, free speech is a government thing. It’s got nothing to do with private companies. Anyone telling you otherwise is blowing smoke up your ass.